Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1/2013

01-03-2013

Beliefs About Expectations Moderate the Influence of Expectations on Pain Perception

Authors: Ian M. Handley, Stephanie L. Fowler, Heather M. Rasinski, Suzanne G. Helfer, Andrew L. Geers

Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Expectations congruently influence, or bias, pain perception. Recent social psychological research reveals that individuals differ in the extent to which they believe in expectation biases and that individuals who believe in expectation biases may adjust for this bias in their perceptions and reactions. That is, idiosyncratic beliefs about expectations can moderate the influence of expectations on experience.

Purpose

Prior research has not examined whether idiosyncratic beliefs about expectations can alter the degree to which one's expectations influence pain perception. Using a laboratory pain stimulus, we examined the possibility that beliefs about expectation biases alter pain responses following both pain- and placebo-analgesic expectations.

Methods

Participants' beliefs about expectation biases were measured. Next, participants were randomly assigned to receive either a pain expectation or a placebo-analgesia expectation prior to a cold-pressor task. After the task, participants rated their pain.

Results

Beliefs about expectation biases significantly influenced pain reports. Specifically, pain reports were more influenced by provided expectations the less participants believed in expectation biases (i.e., pain expectations resulted in more pain than analgesia expectations).

Conclusions

Beliefs about the expectation bias are an important and under-examined predictor of pain and placebo analgesia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kirsch I. How expectancies shape experience. Washington: American Psychological Association; 1999.CrossRef Kirsch I. How expectancies shape experience. Washington: American Psychological Association; 1999.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pollo A, Benedetti F. Pain and the placebo effect. In: Moore RJ, editor. Biobehavioral approaches to pain. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 65–84.CrossRef Pollo A, Benedetti F. Pain and the placebo effect. In: Moore RJ, editor. Biobehavioral approaches to pain. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 65–84.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Price D, Finniss DG, Benedetti F. A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:565–90.PubMedCrossRef Price D, Finniss DG, Benedetti F. A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:565–90.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Turner JA, Deyo RA, Loeser D, Von Korff M, Fordyce WE. The importance of placebo effects in pain treatment and research. J Am Med Assoc. 1994;271:1609–14.CrossRef Turner JA, Deyo RA, Loeser D, Von Korff M, Fordyce WE. The importance of placebo effects in pain treatment and research. J Am Med Assoc. 1994;271:1609–14.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hróbjartsson A, Gotzsche PC. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1594–601.PubMedCrossRef Hróbjartsson A, Gotzsche PC. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1594–601.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Geers AL, Kosbab K, Weiland PE, Helfer SG, Welman JA. Further evidence for individual differences in placebo responding: an interactionist perspective. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62:563–70.PubMedCrossRef Geers AL, Kosbab K, Weiland PE, Helfer SG, Welman JA. Further evidence for individual differences in placebo responding: an interactionist perspective. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62:563–70.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hyland ME, Whalley B, Geraghy AWA. Dispositional predictors of placebo responding: a motivational interpretation of flower essence and gratitude therapy. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62:331–40.PubMedCrossRef Hyland ME, Whalley B, Geraghy AWA. Dispositional predictors of placebo responding: a motivational interpretation of flower essence and gratitude therapy. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62:331–40.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Levine ME, Stern RM, Koch KL. The effects of manipulating expectations through placebo and nocebo administration on gastric tachyarrhythmia and motion-induced nausea. Psychosom Med. 2006;68:478–86.PubMedCrossRef Levine ME, Stern RM, Koch KL. The effects of manipulating expectations through placebo and nocebo administration on gastric tachyarrhythmia and motion-induced nausea. Psychosom Med. 2006;68:478–86.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Handley IM, Albarracín D, Brown RD, Li H, Kumkale EC, Kumkale GT. When the expectations from a message will not be realized: naïve theories can eliminate expectation-congruent judgments via correction. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009;45:933–9.CrossRef Handley IM, Albarracín D, Brown RD, Li H, Kumkale EC, Kumkale GT. When the expectations from a message will not be realized: naïve theories can eliminate expectation-congruent judgments via correction. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009;45:933–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wegener DT, Petty RE. Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naïve theories in corrections for perceived bias. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68:36–51.PubMedCrossRef Wegener DT, Petty RE. Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naïve theories in corrections for perceived bias. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68:36–51.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Isbell LM, Wyer RS. Correcting for mood-induced bias in the evaluation of political candidates: the roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1999;25:237–49.CrossRef Isbell LM, Wyer RS. Correcting for mood-induced bias in the evaluation of political candidates: the roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1999;25:237–49.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wilson TD, Brekke N. Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychol Bull. 1994;116:117–42.PubMedCrossRef Wilson TD, Brekke N. Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. Psychol Bull. 1994;116:117–42.PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage; 1991. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage; 1991.
17.
18.
go back to reference Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:1063–78.PubMedCrossRef Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:1063–78.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Strathman A, Gleicher F, Boninger DS, Edwards CS. The consideration of future consequences: weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;66:742–52.CrossRef Strathman A, Gleicher F, Boninger DS, Edwards CS. The consideration of future consequences: weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;66:742–52.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Beliefs About Expectations Moderate the Influence of Expectations on Pain Perception
Authors
Ian M. Handley
Stephanie L. Fowler
Heather M. Rasinski
Suzanne G. Helfer
Andrew L. Geers
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Electronic ISSN: 1532-7558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9203-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1/2013 Go to the issue