Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Editorial

Being Creative with Old Tools: The Dilating Balloon as a Weapon Against Difficult Bile Duct Stones

Author: Jason N. Rogart

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

One of the joys of practicing therapeutic endoscopy is the resourcefulness that is often required to solve the most difficult challenges with existing or available tools that are not necessarily designed for the problem at hand, with large or difficult-to-remove bile duct stones as prime examples. While 90 % of stones can be removed via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) using conventional methods and instruments (e.g., biliary sphincterotomy and balloon or basket extraction), approximately 10 % are “difficult” either because of their large size, impaction in the bile duct, the presence of bile duct strictures or relative stenoses distal to the stone(s), or of a massively dilated or distorted bile duct confounding stone capture [1]. In these circumstances, more advanced technologies and sophisticated techniques have been developed (see Table 1), but are often more expensive and unavailable at smaller medical centers.
Table 1
Current techniques/devices available for bile duct stone extraction
Extraction balloon
Wire basket
Mechanical lithotripsy basket
Post-sphincterotomy balloon dilation (PSBD)
Endoscopic placement of multiple biliary stents for several months
Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL)
Laser lithotripsy (Holmium, FREDDY, etc.)
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL)
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bergman JJ, Rauws EAJ, Fockens P, et al. Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones. Lancet. 1997;349:1114–1115.CrossRef Bergman JJ, Rauws EAJ, Fockens P, et al. Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones. Lancet. 1997;349:1114–1115.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Staritz M, Ewe K, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH. Endoscopic papillary dilation for the treatment of common bile duct stones and papillary stenosis. Endoscopy. 1983;15:197–198.PubMedCrossRef Staritz M, Ewe K, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH. Endoscopic papillary dilation for the treatment of common bile duct stones and papillary stenosis. Endoscopy. 1983;15:197–198.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference DiSario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1291–1299.PubMedCrossRef DiSario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1291–1299.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Heo JH, Kang DH, Jung J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile-duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:720–726.PubMedCrossRef Heo JH, Kang DH, Jung J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile-duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:720–726.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Stefanidis G, Viazis N, Pleskow D, et al. Large balloon dilation vs. mechanical lithotripsy for the management of large bile duct stones: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:278.PubMedCrossRef Stefanidis G, Viazis N, Pleskow D, et al. Large balloon dilation vs. mechanical lithotripsy for the management of large bile duct stones: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:278.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Huang SW, Lin CH, Lee MS, Tsou YK, Sung KF. Residual common bile duct stones on direct peroral cholangioscopy using ultraslim endoscope. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:4966–4972.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Huang SW, Lin CH, Lee MS, Tsou YK, Sung KF. Residual common bile duct stones on direct peroral cholangioscopy using ultraslim endoscope. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:4966–4972.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Shinohara Y, Moriyasu F, Tsu-chida A. Evaluation of residual bile duct stones by peroral cholangioscopy in comparison with balloon-cholangiography. Dig Endosc. 2010;22:S85–S89. Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Shinohara Y, Moriyasu F, Tsu-chida A. Evaluation of residual bile duct stones by peroral cholangioscopy in comparison with balloon-cholangiography. Dig Endosc. 2010;22:S85–S89.
Metadata
Title
Being Creative with Old Tools: The Dilating Balloon as a Weapon Against Difficult Bile Duct Stones
Author
Jason N. Rogart
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3219-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2014 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine