Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Women's Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Bayesian semi-parametric spatial modelling of intimate partner violence in Namibia using 2013 Demographic Health Survey Data

Authors: Oludoyinmola Ojifinni, Innocent Maposa, Latifat Ibisomi

Published in: BMC Women's Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important public health problem with health and socioeconomic consequences and is endemic in Namibia. Studies assessing risk factors for IPV often use logistic and Poisson regression without geographical location information and spatial effects. We used a Bayesian spatial semi-parametric regression model to determine the risk factors for IPV in Namibia; assess the non-linear effects of age difference between partners and determine spatial effects in the different regions on IPV prevalence.

Methods

We used the couples’ dataset of the 2013–2014 Namibia Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) obtained on request from Measure DHS. The DHS domestic violence module included 2226 women. We generated a binary variable measuring IPV from the questions “ever experienced physical, sexual or emotional violence?” Covariates included respondent’s educational level, age, couples’ age difference, place of residence and partner’s educational level. All estimation was done with the full Bayesian approach using R version 3.5.2 implementing the R2BayesX package.

Results

IPV country prevalence was 33.3% (95% CI = 30.1–36.5%); Kavango had the highest [50.6% (95% CI = 41.2–60.1%)] and Oshana the lowest [11.5% (95% CI = 3.2–19.9%)] regional prevalence. IPV prevalence was highest among teenagers [60.8% (95% CI = 36.9–84.7%)]). The spatial semi-parametric model used for adjusted results controlled for regional spatial effects, respondent’s age, age difference, respondent’s years of education, residence, wealth, and education levels. Women with higher education were 50% less likely to experience IPV [aOR: 0.46, 95% CI = 0.23–0.87]. For non-linear effects, the risk of IPV was high for women ≥ 5 years older or ≥ 25 years younger than their partners. Younger and older women had higher risks of IPV than those between 25 and 45 years. For spatial variation of IPV prevalence, northern regions had low spatial effects while western regions had very high spatial effects.

Conclusion

The prevalence of IPV among Namibia women was high especially among teenagers, with higher educational levels being protective. The risk of IPV was lower in rural than urban areas and higher with wide partner age differences. Interventions and policies for IPV prevention in Namibia are needed for couples with wide age differences as well as for younger women, women with lower educational attainment and in urban and western regions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Rafael L, editors. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Rafael L, editors. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
4.
go back to reference Fulu E, Jewkes R, Roselli T, Garcia-Moreno C. Prevalence of and factors associated with male perpetration of intimate partner violence: Findings from the UN multi-country cross-sectional study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific. Lancet Glob Heal. Jewkes et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND; 2013;1:e208–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70069-X Fulu E, Jewkes R, Roselli T, Garcia-Moreno C. Prevalence of and factors associated with male perpetration of intimate partner violence: Findings from the UN multi-country cross-sectional study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific. Lancet Glob Heal. Jewkes et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND; 2013;1:e208–18. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S2214-109X(13)70069-X
6.
go back to reference Bamiwuye SO, Odimegwu C. Spousal violence in sub-Saharan Africa: does household poverty-wealth matter? Reprod Health. 2014;11:1–10.CrossRef Bamiwuye SO, Odimegwu C. Spousal violence in sub-Saharan Africa: does household poverty-wealth matter? Reprod Health. 2014;11:1–10.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Abramsky T, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, Devries K, Kiss L, Ellsberg M, et al. What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Findings from the WHO Multi-country Study on women’s Health and Domestic Violence. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:1–17.CrossRef Abramsky T, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, Devries K, Kiss L, Ellsberg M, et al. What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Findings from the WHO Multi-country Study on women’s Health and Domestic Violence. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:1–17.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Spencer CM, Stith SM, Cafferky B. Risk markers for physical intimate partner violence victimization: a meta-analysis. Aggress Violent Behav. 2019;44:8–17.CrossRef Spencer CM, Stith SM, Cafferky B. Risk markers for physical intimate partner violence victimization: a meta-analysis. Aggress Violent Behav. 2019;44:8–17.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention; Violence against women III. Lancet. 2002;359:1423–9.CrossRef Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention; Violence against women III. Lancet. 2002;359:1423–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Adebowale AS. Spousal age difference and associated predictors of intimate partner violence in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1–15.CrossRef Adebowale AS. Spousal age difference and associated predictors of intimate partner violence in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1–15.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kapiga S, Harvey S, Muhammad AK, Stöckl H, Mshana G, Hashim R, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence and abuse and associated factors among women enrolled into a cluster randomised trial in northwestern Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:1–11.CrossRef Kapiga S, Harvey S, Muhammad AK, Stöckl H, Mshana G, Hashim R, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence and abuse and associated factors among women enrolled into a cluster randomised trial in northwestern Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:1–11.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bikinesi LT, Mash R, Joyner K. Prevalence of intimate partner violence and associated factors amongst women attending antenatal care at Outapi clinic, Namibia: a descriptive survey. Afr J Prim Heal Care Fam Med. 2017;9:1–6.CrossRef Bikinesi LT, Mash R, Joyner K. Prevalence of intimate partner violence and associated factors amongst women attending antenatal care at Outapi clinic, Namibia: a descriptive survey. Afr J Prim Heal Care Fam Med. 2017;9:1–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tanimu TS, Yohanna S, Omeiza SY. The pattern and correlates of intimate partner violence among women in Kano, Nigeria. Afr J Prim Heal Care Fam Med. 2016;8:a1209. Tanimu TS, Yohanna S, Omeiza SY. The pattern and correlates of intimate partner violence among women in Kano, Nigeria. Afr J Prim Heal Care Fam Med. 2016;8:a1209.
15.
go back to reference Aihie O. Prevalence of domestic violence in Nigeria: implications for counselling. Edo J Couns. 2010;2:1–8. Aihie O. Prevalence of domestic violence in Nigeria: implications for counselling. Edo J Couns. 2010;2:1–8.
16.
go back to reference Diddy A. Controlling behavior, power relations within intimate relationships and intimate partner physical and sexual violence against women in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:511.CrossRef Diddy A. Controlling behavior, power relations within intimate relationships and intimate partner physical and sexual violence against women in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:511.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Simona SJ, Muchindu M, Ntalasha H. Intimate partner violence (IPV) in Zambia: sociodemographic determinants and association with use of maternal health care. DHS Work. Pap. Rockville, Maryland, USA; 2015. Simona SJ, Muchindu M, Ntalasha H. Intimate partner violence (IPV) in Zambia: sociodemographic determinants and association with use of maternal health care. DHS Work. Pap. Rockville, Maryland, USA; 2015.
19.
go back to reference The Namibia Ministry of Health and Social Services (MoHSS), ICF International. The Namibia Demographic Health Survey 2013. Windhoek, Namibia and Rockville, Maryland, USA; 2014. The Namibia Ministry of Health and Social Services (MoHSS), ICF International. The Namibia Demographic Health Survey 2013. Windhoek, Namibia and Rockville, Maryland, USA; 2014.
21.
go back to reference Andersson N, Ho-Foster A, Mitchell S, Scheepers E, Goldstein S. Risk factors for domestic physical violence: national cross-sectional household surveys in eight southern African countries. BMC Womens Health. 2007;7:1–13.CrossRef Andersson N, Ho-Foster A, Mitchell S, Scheepers E, Goldstein S. Risk factors for domestic physical violence: national cross-sectional household surveys in eight southern African countries. BMC Womens Health. 2007;7:1–13.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Duff S, Nampweya M, Tree J. Men’s accounts of passion killings in the Namibian context. J Interpers Violence. 2017;35:4940–59.CrossRef Duff S, Nampweya M, Tree J. Men’s accounts of passion killings in the Namibian context. J Interpers Violence. 2017;35:4940–59.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ngesa O, Mwambi H, Achia T. Bayesian spatial semi-parametric modeling of HIV variation in Kenya. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e103299.CrossRef Ngesa O, Mwambi H, Achia T. Bayesian spatial semi-parametric modeling of HIV variation in Kenya. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e103299.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics (CT) scales. J Marriage Fam. 1979;41:75.CrossRef Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics (CT) scales. J Marriage Fam. 1979;41:75.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Demaret L, Dyn N, Iske A. Image compression by linear splines over adaptive triangulations. Signal Process. 2006;86:1604–16.CrossRef Demaret L, Dyn N, Iske A. Image compression by linear splines over adaptive triangulations. Signal Process. 2006;86:1604–16.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Semahegn A, Mengistie B. Domestic violence against women and associated factors in Ethiopia; Systematic review. Reprod Health. 2015;12:1–2.CrossRef Semahegn A, Mengistie B. Domestic violence against women and associated factors in Ethiopia; Systematic review. Reprod Health. 2015;12:1–2.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hornung CA, McCullough BC, Sugimoto T. Status relationships in marriage: risk factors in spouse abuse. J Marriage Fam. 1981;43:675–92.CrossRef Hornung CA, McCullough BC, Sugimoto T. Status relationships in marriage: risk factors in spouse abuse. J Marriage Fam. 1981;43:675–92.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Jones JH, Ferguson B. Demographic and social predictors of intimate partner violence in Colombia: a dyadic power perspective. Hum Nat. 2009;20:184–203.CrossRef Jones JH, Ferguson B. Demographic and social predictors of intimate partner violence in Colombia: a dyadic power perspective. Hum Nat. 2009;20:184–203.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Volpe EM, Hardie TL, Cerulli C, Sommers MS, Morrison-Beedy D. What’s age got to do with it? Partner age difference, power, intimate partner violence, and sexual risk in urban adolescents. J Interpers Violence. 2013;28:2068–87.CrossRef Volpe EM, Hardie TL, Cerulli C, Sommers MS, Morrison-Beedy D. What’s age got to do with it? Partner age difference, power, intimate partner violence, and sexual risk in urban adolescents. J Interpers Violence. 2013;28:2068–87.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bayesian semi-parametric spatial modelling of intimate partner violence in Namibia using 2013 Demographic Health Survey Data
Authors
Oludoyinmola Ojifinni
Innocent Maposa
Latifat Ibisomi
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Women's Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6874
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01421-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Women's Health 1/2021 Go to the issue