Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2020

01-09-2020 | Basic Surgery | Original Scientific Report

Patient Satisfaction in Emergency General Surgery: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

Authors: Ned Kinnear, Matheesha Herath, Samantha Jolly, Jennie Han, Minh Tran, Dominic Parker, Michael O’Callaghan, Derek Hennessey, Christopher Dobbins, Tarik Sammour, James Moore

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The importance of the patient experience is increasingly being recognised. However, there is a dearth of studies regarding factors affecting patient-reported outcomes in emergency general surgery (EGS), including none from the Southern Hemisphere. We aim to prospectively assess factors associated with patient satisfaction in this setting.

Methods

In this prospective cross-sectional study, all consecutive adult patients admitted to an acute surgical unit over four weeks were invited to complete a validated Patient-Reported Experience Measures questionnaire. These were completed either in person when discharge was imminent or by telephone  <4 weeks post-discharge. Responses were used to determine factors associated with overall patient satisfaction.

Results

From 146 eligible patients, 100 (68%) completed the questionnaire, with a mean overall satisfaction score of 8.3/10. On multivariate analyses, eight factors were significantly associated with increased overall satisfaction. Five of these were similar to those previously prescribed by other like studies, being patient age  >50 years, sufficient analgesia, satisfaction with the level of senior medical staff, important questions answered by nurses and confidence in decisions made about treatment. Three identified factors were new: sufficient privacy in the emergency department, sufficient notice prior to discharge and feeling well looked after in hospital.

Conclusions

Factors associated with patient satisfaction were identified at multiple points of the patient journey. While some of these have been reported in similar studies, most differed. Hospitals should assess factors valued by their EGS population prior to implementing initiatives to improve patient satisfaction.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Priebe S, Golden E, McCabe R et al (2012) Patient-reported outcome data generated in a clinical intervention in community mental health care-psychometric properties. BMC Psychiatry 12:113PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Priebe S, Golden E, McCabe R et al (2012) Patient-reported outcome data generated in a clinical intervention in community mental health care-psychometric properties. BMC Psychiatry 12:113PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Seid M (2005) The PedsQL as a pediatric patient-reported outcome: reliability and validity of the PedsQL measurement model in 25,000 children. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 5(6):705–719PubMedCrossRef Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Seid M (2005) The PedsQL as a pediatric patient-reported outcome: reliability and validity of the PedsQL measurement model in 25,000 children. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 5(6):705–719PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Apers S, Kovacs AH, Luyckx K et al (2015) Assessment of Patterns of patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease-international study (APPROACH-IS): rationale, design, and methods. Int J Cardiol 179:334–342PubMedCrossRef Apers S, Kovacs AH, Luyckx K et al (2015) Assessment of Patterns of patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease-international study (APPROACH-IS): rationale, design, and methods. Int J Cardiol 179:334–342PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dickfos M, Ibrahim H, Evans A et al (2018) Cohort study on emergency general surgery patients and an observation unit. ANZ J Surg 88(7–8):713–717PubMedCrossRef Dickfos M, Ibrahim H, Evans A et al (2018) Cohort study on emergency general surgery patients and an observation unit. ANZ J Surg 88(7–8):713–717PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Page D, Dooreemeah D, Thiruchelvam D (2014) Acute surgical unit: the Australasian experience. ANZ J Surg 84:25–30PubMedCrossRef Page D, Dooreemeah D, Thiruchelvam D (2014) Acute surgical unit: the Australasian experience. ANZ J Surg 84:25–30PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bazzi ZT, Kinnear N, Bazzi CS et al (2018) Impact of an acute surgical unit on outcomes in acute cholecystitis. ANZ J Surg 88(12):E835–E839PubMedCrossRef Bazzi ZT, Kinnear N, Bazzi CS et al (2018) Impact of an acute surgical unit on outcomes in acute cholecystitis. ANZ J Surg 88(12):E835–E839PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kinnear N, Britten-Jones P, Hennessey D et al (2017) Impact of an acute surgical unit on patient outcomes in South Australia. ANZ J Surg 87(10):825–829PubMedCrossRef Kinnear N, Britten-Jones P, Hennessey D et al (2017) Impact of an acute surgical unit on patient outcomes in South Australia. ANZ J Surg 87(10):825–829PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference DeGirolamo K, Murphy PB, D’Souza K et al (2017) Processes of health care delivery, education, and provider satisfaction in acute care surgery: a systematic review. Am Surg 83(12):1438–1446PubMed DeGirolamo K, Murphy PB, D’Souza K et al (2017) Processes of health care delivery, education, and provider satisfaction in acute care surgery: a systematic review. Am Surg 83(12):1438–1446PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kinnear N, Tran M, Han J et al (2019) Does emergency general surgery model affect staff satisfaction, training and working hours? ANZ J Surg 90(3):262–267PubMedCrossRef Kinnear N, Tran M, Han J et al (2019) Does emergency general surgery model affect staff satisfaction, training and working hours? ANZ J Surg 90(3):262–267PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Maa J, Carter JT, Gosnell JE et al (2007) The surgical hospitalist: a new model for emergency surgical care. J Am Coll Surg 205(5):704–711PubMedCrossRef Maa J, Carter JT, Gosnell JE et al (2007) The surgical hospitalist: a new model for emergency surgical care. J Am Coll Surg 205(5):704–711PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Anantha RV, Parry N, Vogt K et al (2014) Implementation of an acute care emergency surgical service: a cost analysis from the surgeon’s perspective. Can J Surg 57(2):E9–E14PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Anantha RV, Parry N, Vogt K et al (2014) Implementation of an acute care emergency surgical service: a cost analysis from the surgeon’s perspective. Can J Surg 57(2):E9–E14PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schmocker RK, Cherney Stafford LM, Siy AB et al (2015) Understanding the determinants of patient satisfaction with surgical care using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surgical care survey (S-CAHPS). Surgery (United States) 158(6):1724–1733 Schmocker RK, Cherney Stafford LM, Siy AB et al (2015) Understanding the determinants of patient satisfaction with surgical care using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surgical care survey (S-CAHPS). Surgery (United States) 158(6):1724–1733
15.
go back to reference Kahn SA, Iannuzzi JC, Stassen NA et al (2015) Measuring satisfaction: factors that drive hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems survey responses in a trauma and acute care surgery population. Am Surg 81(5):537–543PubMed Kahn SA, Iannuzzi JC, Stassen NA et al (2015) Measuring satisfaction: factors that drive hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems survey responses in a trauma and acute care surgery population. Am Surg 81(5):537–543PubMed
16.
go back to reference Hommel G (1988) A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika 75(2):383–386CrossRef Hommel G (1988) A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika 75(2):383–386CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Forrestal B, Hynes T, Clarke-Moloney M et al (2013) Patient satisfaction following emergency admission via a surgical assessment unit and an emergency department. Ir J Med Sci 182(2):261–266PubMedCrossRef Forrestal B, Hynes T, Clarke-Moloney M et al (2013) Patient satisfaction following emergency admission via a surgical assessment unit and an emergency department. Ir J Med Sci 182(2):261–266PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kwong E, Neuburger J, Murray D et al (2018) Feasibility of collecting and assessing patient-reported outcomes for emergency admissions: laparotomy for gastrointestinal conditions. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 5(1):e000238PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kwong E, Neuburger J, Murray D et al (2018) Feasibility of collecting and assessing patient-reported outcomes for emergency admissions: laparotomy for gastrointestinal conditions. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 5(1):e000238PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Navarro AP, Hardy E, Oakley B et al (2017) The front-line general surgery consultant as a new model of emergency care. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99(7):550–554PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Navarro AP, Hardy E, Oakley B et al (2017) The front-line general surgery consultant as a new model of emergency care. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99(7):550–554PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ali TF, Warkentin LM, Gazala S et al (2015) Self-reported outcomes in individuals aged 65 and older admitted for treatment to an acute care surgical service: a 6-month prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 63(11):2388–2394PubMedCrossRef Ali TF, Warkentin LM, Gazala S et al (2015) Self-reported outcomes in individuals aged 65 and older admitted for treatment to an acute care surgical service: a 6-month prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 63(11):2388–2394PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Eijsvoogel CF, Peters RW, Budding AJ et al (2014) Implementation of an acute surgical admission ward. Br J Surg 101(11):1434–1438PubMedCrossRef Eijsvoogel CF, Peters RW, Budding AJ et al (2014) Implementation of an acute surgical admission ward. Br J Surg 101(11):1434–1438PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ullah MF, Fleming C, Fox C et al (2019) Patient experience in a surgical assessment unit following a closed-loop audit using a Kaizen Lean system. Ir J Med Sci 189(2):641–647PubMedCrossRef Ullah MF, Fleming C, Fox C et al (2019) Patient experience in a surgical assessment unit following a closed-loop audit using a Kaizen Lean system. Ir J Med Sci 189(2):641–647PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Johnstone C, Harwood R, Gilliam A et al (2015) A clinical decisions unit improves emergency general surgery care delivery. Clin Gov Int J 20(4):191–198CrossRef Johnstone C, Harwood R, Gilliam A et al (2015) A clinical decisions unit improves emergency general surgery care delivery. Clin Gov Int J 20(4):191–198CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Nilsson E, Orwelius L, Kristenson M (2016) Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish National Quality Registers. J Intern Med 279(2):141–153PubMedCrossRef Nilsson E, Orwelius L, Kristenson M (2016) Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish National Quality Registers. J Intern Med 279(2):141–153PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference US Dept of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration USA (2006) Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:79CrossRef US Dept of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration USA (2006) Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:79CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Ghaferi A, Cassidy R et al (2016) Are patient-reported outcomes correlated with clinical outcomes after surgery? A population-based study. Ann Surg 264(4):682–689PubMedCrossRef Waljee JF, Ghaferi A, Cassidy R et al (2016) Are patient-reported outcomes correlated with clinical outcomes after surgery? A population-based study. Ann Surg 264(4):682–689PubMedCrossRef
30.
33.
go back to reference Bennett AV, Jensen RE, Basch E (2012) Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice. CA Cancer J Clin 62(5):337–347PubMedCrossRef Bennett AV, Jensen RE, Basch E (2012) Electronic patient-reported outcome systems in oncology clinical practice. CA Cancer J Clin 62(5):337–347PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Weldring T, Smith SM (2013) Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights 6:61–68PubMedPubMedCentral Weldring T, Smith SM (2013) Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights 6:61–68PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al (2007) The Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 45(5 Suppl 1):S3–S11PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N et al (2007) The Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 45(5 Suppl 1):S3–S11PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Bradley M, Braverman J, Harrington M et al (2016) Patients’ motivations and interest in research: characteristics of volunteers for patient-led projects on PatientsLikeMe. Res Involv Engagem 2:33PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bradley M, Braverman J, Harrington M et al (2016) Patients’ motivations and interest in research: characteristics of volunteers for patient-led projects on PatientsLikeMe. Res Involv Engagem 2:33PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bennett AV, Dueck AC, Mitchell SA et al (2016) Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Health Qual Life Outcomes 14:24PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bennett AV, Dueck AC, Mitchell SA et al (2016) Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Health Qual Life Outcomes 14:24PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient Satisfaction in Emergency General Surgery: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study
Authors
Ned Kinnear
Matheesha Herath
Samantha Jolly
Jennie Han
Minh Tran
Dominic Parker
Michael O’Callaghan
Derek Hennessey
Christopher Dobbins
Tarik Sammour
James Moore
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Basic Surgery
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05561-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

World Journal of Surgery 9/2020 Go to the issue