Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology 1/2013

01-01-2013

Basic imaging properties of an indirect flat-panel detector system employing irradiation side sampling (ISS) technology for chest radiography: comparison with a computed radiographic system

Authors: Nobukazu Tanaka, Yuki Yano, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Tsutomu Akasaka, Masayuki Sasaki, Masafumi Ohki, Junji Morishita

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The image quality and potential usefulness for patient skin-dose reduction of a newly developed flat-panel detector (FPD) system employing irradiation side sampling (ISS) were investigated and compared to a conventional computed radiography (CR) system. We used the X-ray beam quality of RQA 9 as noted in the standard evaluation method by the International Electrotechnical Commission 62220-1 to evaluate the image quality of the detector for chest radiography. The presampled modulation transfer function (MTF) of the ISS-FPD system was slightly higher than that of the CR system in the horizontal direction at more than 2.2 cycles/mm. However, the presampled MTF of the ISS-FPD system was slightly lower than that of the CR system in the vertical direction. The Wiener spectrum of the ISS-FPD system showed a 50–65 % lesser noise level than that of the CR system under the same exposure condition. The detective quantum efficiency of the ISS-FPD system was at least twice as great as that of the CR system. We conclude that the ISS-FPD system has the potential to reduce the patient skin dose compared to a conventional CR system for chest radiography.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, Kato H. Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology. 1983;148(3):833–8.PubMed Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, Kato H. Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology. 1983;148(3):833–8.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Higashida Y, Moribe N, Hirata Y, Morita K, Doudanuki S, Sonoda Y, Katsuda N, Hiai Y, Misumi W, Matsumoto M, Yoshioka S, Takahashi M. Computed radiography utilizing laser-stimulated luminescence: detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic objects. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1988;12(3):137–45.PubMedCrossRef Higashida Y, Moribe N, Hirata Y, Morita K, Doudanuki S, Sonoda Y, Katsuda N, Hiai Y, Misumi W, Matsumoto M, Yoshioka S, Takahashi M. Computed radiography utilizing laser-stimulated luminescence: detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic objects. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1988;12(3):137–45.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fujita H, Ueda K, Morishita J, Fujikawa T, Ohtsuka A, Sai T. Basic imaging properties of a computed radiographic system with photostimulable phosphors. Med Phys. 1989;16(1):52–9.PubMedCrossRef Fujita H, Ueda K, Morishita J, Fujikawa T, Ohtsuka A, Sai T. Basic imaging properties of a computed radiographic system with photostimulable phosphors. Med Phys. 1989;16(1):52–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Morishita J, Fujita H, Ohtsuka A, Ueda K, Fujikawa T, Yamauchi S, Nishihara S, Hashida M, Kanzaki R, Kanai K, Tanaka S, Nakanishi T. Basic imaging properties in a computed radiography system. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 1990;46(6):824–30 (in Japanese). Morishita J, Fujita H, Ohtsuka A, Ueda K, Fujikawa T, Yamauchi S, Nishihara S, Hashida M, Kanzaki R, Kanai K, Tanaka S, Nakanishi T. Basic imaging properties in a computed radiography system. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 1990;46(6):824–30 (in Japanese).
5.
go back to reference Sanada S, Doi K, Xu XW, Yin FF, Giger ML, MacMahon H. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems. Med Phys. 1991;18(3):414–20. Sanada S, Doi K, Xu XW, Yin FF, Giger ML, MacMahon H. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems. Med Phys. 1991;18(3):414–20.
6.
go back to reference Oda N, Nakata H, Murakami S, Terada K, Nakamura K, Yoshida A. Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography. Invest Radiol. 1996;31(3):126–31.PubMedCrossRef Oda N, Nakata H, Murakami S, Terada K, Nakamura K, Yoshida A. Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography. Invest Radiol. 1996;31(3):126–31.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sato K, Nariyuki F, Kuwabara T, Fukui S, Okada Y, Nabeta T, Hosoi Y, Enomoto J, Sasao M, Seguchi Y. Development of “CALNEO”, an indirect-conversion digital radiography system with high-conversion efficiency. Fujifilm Res Dev. 2010;55:10–3. Sato K, Nariyuki F, Kuwabara T, Fukui S, Okada Y, Nabeta T, Hosoi Y, Enomoto J, Sasao M, Seguchi Y. Development of “CALNEO”, an indirect-conversion digital radiography system with high-conversion efficiency. Fujifilm Res Dev. 2010;55:10–3.
8.
go back to reference Higashida Y, Frank PH, Doi K. High-speed, single-screen/single-emulsion film systems: basic imaging properties and preliminary clinical applications. Radiology. 1983;149(2):571–7.PubMed Higashida Y, Frank PH, Doi K. High-speed, single-screen/single-emulsion film systems: basic imaging properties and preliminary clinical applications. Radiology. 1983;149(2):571–7.PubMed
9.
go back to reference IEC 61267 Ed. 1.0, Medical diagnostic X-ray equipment—radiation conditions for use in the determination of characteristics. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 1994. IEC 61267 Ed. 1.0, Medical diagnostic X-ray equipment—radiation conditions for use in the determination of characteristics. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 1994.
10.
go back to reference IEC 62220-1 Ed. 1.0, Medical electrical equipment—characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices—part 1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2003. IEC 62220-1 Ed. 1.0, Medical electrical equipment—characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices—part 1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2003.
11.
go back to reference Kanai K, Ohtsuka A, Morishita J, Yamauchi S, Ueda K, Nishihara S, Tanak S, Nakanishi T. Comparison of measurement methods of characteristic curves for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) systems. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 1988;44(10):1492–6 (in Japanese). Kanai K, Ohtsuka A, Morishita J, Yamauchi S, Ueda K, Nishihara S, Tanak S, Nakanishi T. Comparison of measurement methods of characteristic curves for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) systems. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 1988;44(10):1492–6 (in Japanese).
12.
go back to reference Morishita J, Fujita H, Sakamoto K, Ueda K, Ohtsuka A, Fujikawa T, Yamauchi S, Kamakura T, Tanaka S. Measurements of characteristic curves in a computed radiographic system (II). Med Imaging Inf Sci. 1989;6(1):25–33 (in Japanese). Morishita J, Fujita H, Sakamoto K, Ueda K, Ohtsuka A, Fujikawa T, Yamauchi S, Kamakura T, Tanaka S. Measurements of characteristic curves in a computed radiographic system (II). Med Imaging Inf Sci. 1989;6(1):25–33 (in Japanese).
13.
go back to reference Samei E, Flynn MJ, Reimann DA. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. Med Phys. 1998;25(1):102–13.PubMedCrossRef Samei E, Flynn MJ, Reimann DA. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. Med Phys. 1998;25(1):102–13.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Samei E, Ranger NT, Dobbins JT 3rd, Chen Y. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function. Med Phys. 2006;33(5):1454–65.PubMedCrossRef Samei E, Ranger NT, Dobbins JT 3rd, Chen Y. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function. Med Phys. 2006;33(5):1454–65.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Higashide R, Ichikawa K, Kunitomo H, Sawada M. Proposal and verification of presampled MTF measurement by the simple analysis method using the edge method. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2008;64(4):417–25 (in Japanese). Higashide R, Ichikawa K, Kunitomo H, Sawada M. Proposal and verification of presampled MTF measurement by the simple analysis method using the edge method. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2008;64(4):417–25 (in Japanese).
16.
go back to reference Higashide R. Physical image quality assessment in digital radiography: modulation transfer function-edge method. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2009;65(10):1449–56 (in Japanese). Higashide R. Physical image quality assessment in digital radiography: modulation transfer function-edge method. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2009;65(10):1449–56 (in Japanese).
17.
go back to reference Fetterly KA, Hangiandreou NJ, Schueler BA, Ritenour ER. Measurement of the presampled two-dimensional modulation transfer function of digital imaging systems. Med Phys. 2002;29(5):913–21.PubMedCrossRef Fetterly KA, Hangiandreou NJ, Schueler BA, Ritenour ER. Measurement of the presampled two-dimensional modulation transfer function of digital imaging systems. Med Phys. 2002;29(5):913–21.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fetterly KA, Schueler BA. Performance evaluation of a “dual-side read” dedicated mammography computed radiography system. Med Phys. 2003;30(7):1843–54.PubMedCrossRef Fetterly KA, Schueler BA. Performance evaluation of a “dual-side read” dedicated mammography computed radiography system. Med Phys. 2003;30(7):1843–54.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Giger ML, Doi K, Metz CE. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum. Med Phys. 1984;11(6):797–805.PubMedCrossRef Giger ML, Doi K, Metz CE. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum. Med Phys. 1984;11(6):797–805.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dobbins JT 3rd, Samei E, Ranger NT, Chen Y. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. Med Phys. 2006;33(5):1466–75.PubMedCrossRef Dobbins JT 3rd, Samei E, Ranger NT, Chen Y. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. Med Phys. 2006;33(5):1466–75.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Asahara M. Physical image quality assessment in digital radiography: noise power spectrum. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2009;65(12):1671–9 (in Japanese). Asahara M. Physical image quality assessment in digital radiography: noise power spectrum. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2009;65(12):1671–9 (in Japanese).
22.
go back to reference Zhou Z, Gao F, Zhao H, Zhang L. Techniques to improve the accuracy of noise power spectrum measurements in digital x-ray imaging based on background trends removal. Med Phys. 2011;38(3):1600–10.PubMedCrossRef Zhou Z, Gao F, Zhao H, Zhang L. Techniques to improve the accuracy of noise power spectrum measurements in digital x-ray imaging based on background trends removal. Med Phys. 2011;38(3):1600–10.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Neitzel U, Günther-Kohfahl S, Borasi G, Samei E. Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set. Med Phys. 2004;31(8):2205–11.PubMedCrossRef Neitzel U, Günther-Kohfahl S, Borasi G, Samei E. Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set. Med Phys. 2004;31(8):2205–11.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ranger NT, Samei E, Dobbins JT 3rd, Ravin CE. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency in digital detectors consistent with the IEC 62220-1 standard: practical considerations regarding the choice of filter material. Med Phys. 2005;32(7):2305–11.PubMedCrossRef Ranger NT, Samei E, Dobbins JT 3rd, Ravin CE. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency in digital detectors consistent with the IEC 62220-1 standard: practical considerations regarding the choice of filter material. Med Phys. 2005;32(7):2305–11.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kano A. Physical image quality assessment in digital radiography: detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2010;66(1):88–93 (in Japanese). Kano A. Physical image quality assessment in digital radiography: detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2010;66(1):88–93 (in Japanese).
26.
go back to reference MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, Patz EF Jr, Swensen SJ. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2005;237(2):395–400.PubMedCrossRef MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, Patz EF Jr, Swensen SJ. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2005;237(2):395–400.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sato K, Nariyuki F, Nomura H, Takasu A, Fukui S, Nakatsu M, Okada Y, Nabeta T, Hosoi Y. Effect of x-ray incident direction and scintillator layer design on image quality of indirect-conversion flat-panel detector with GOS phosphor. In: Proceedings of the SPIE; 2011. vol. 7961, p. 79614I-1–8. Sato K, Nariyuki F, Nomura H, Takasu A, Fukui S, Nakatsu M, Okada Y, Nabeta T, Hosoi Y. Effect of x-ray incident direction and scintillator layer design on image quality of indirect-conversion flat-panel detector with GOS phosphor. In: Proceedings of the SPIE; 2011. vol. 7961, p. 79614I-1–8.
28.
go back to reference Samei E. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors. Med Phys. 2003;30(7):1747–57.PubMedCrossRef Samei E. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors. Med Phys. 2003;30(7):1747–57.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Matsumoto M, Yamazaki T, Nokita M, Hayashida S, Yoshida A, Ideguchi T, Himuro K, Ohki M, Kumazawa S, Higashida Y. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2005;61(12):1656–65. Matsumoto M, Yamazaki T, Nokita M, Hayashida S, Yoshida A, Ideguchi T, Himuro K, Ohki M, Kumazawa S, Higashida Y. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2005;61(12):1656–65.
30.
go back to reference Borasi G, Nitrosi A, Ferrari P, Tassoni D. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography. Med Phys. 2003;30(7):1719–31.PubMedCrossRef Borasi G, Nitrosi A, Ferrari P, Tassoni D. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography. Med Phys. 2003;30(7):1719–31.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Goo JM, Im JG, Lee HJ, Chung MJ, Seo JB, Kim HY, Lee YJ, Kang JW, Kim JH. Detection of simulated chest lesions by using soft-copy reading: comparison of an amorphous silicon flat-panel-detector system and a storage-phosphor system. Radiology. 2002;224(1):242–6.PubMedCrossRef Goo JM, Im JG, Lee HJ, Chung MJ, Seo JB, Kim HY, Lee YJ, Kang JW, Kim JH. Detection of simulated chest lesions by using soft-copy reading: comparison of an amorphous silicon flat-panel-detector system and a storage-phosphor system. Radiology. 2002;224(1):242–6.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Rapp-Bernhardt U, Roehl FW, Gibbs RC, Schmidl H, Krause UW, Bernhardt TM. Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings. Radiology. 2003;227(2):484–92.PubMedCrossRef Rapp-Bernhardt U, Roehl FW, Gibbs RC, Schmidl H, Krause UW, Bernhardt TM. Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings. Radiology. 2003;227(2):484–92.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Aufrichtig R. Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography. Med Phys. 1999;26(7):1349–58.PubMedCrossRef Aufrichtig R. Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography. Med Phys. 1999;26(7):1349–58.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Rong XJ, Shaw CC, Liu X, Lemacks MR, Thompson SK. Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems—a contrast-detail phantom study. Med Phys. 2001;28(11):2328–35.PubMedCrossRef Rong XJ, Shaw CC, Liu X, Lemacks MR, Thompson SK. Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems—a contrast-detail phantom study. Med Phys. 2001;28(11):2328–35.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Basic imaging properties of an indirect flat-panel detector system employing irradiation side sampling (ISS) technology for chest radiography: comparison with a computed radiographic system
Authors
Nobukazu Tanaka
Yuki Yano
Hidetake Yabuuchi
Tsutomu Akasaka
Masayuki Sasaki
Masafumi Ohki
Junji Morishita
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-012-0184-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Radiological Physics and Technology 1/2013 Go to the issue