Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Baseline predictors of treatment outcome in Internet-based alcohol interventions: a recursive partitioning analysis alongside a randomized trial

Authors: Matthijs Blankers, Maarten WJ Koeter, Gerard M Schippers

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Internet-based interventions are seen as attractive for harmful users of alcohol and lead to desirable clinical outcomes. Some participants will however not achieve the desired results. In this study, harmful users of alcohol have been partitioned in subgroups with low, intermediate or high probability of positive treatment outcome, using recursive partitioning classification tree analysis.

Methods

Data were obtained from a randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of two Internet-based alcohol interventions. The main outcome variable was treatment response, a dichotomous outcome measure for treatment success. Candidate predictors for the classification analysis were first selected using univariate regression. Next, a tree decision model to classify participants in categories with a low, medium and high probability of treatment response was constructed using recursive partitioning software.

Results

Based on literature review, 46 potentially relevant baseline predictors were identified. Five variables were selected using univariate regression as candidate predictors for the classification analysis. Two variables were found most relevant for classification and selected for the decision tree model: ‘living alone’, and ‘interpersonal sensitivity’. Using sensitivity analysis, the robustness of the decision tree model was supported.

Conclusions

Harmful alcohol users in a shared living situation, with high interpersonal sensitivity, have a significantly higher probability of positive treatment outcome. The resulting decision tree model may be used as part of a decision support system but is on its own insufficient as a screening algorithm with satisfactory clinical utility.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register (Cochrane Collaboration): NTR-TC1155.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Rehm J, Taylor B, Room R: Global burden of disease from alcohol, illicit drugs and tobacco. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006, 25: 503-513. 10.1080/09595230600944453.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J: Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet. 2009, 373: 2223-2233. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60746-7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B: The Treatment Gap in Mental Health Care. Bull World Health Organ. 2004, 82: 858-866.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Blankers M, Kerssemakers R, Schramade M, Nabitz U, Schippers GM: Internetprogramm Selbsthilfe Alcohol: Erste Ergebnisse [Internet program self-help alcohol: first experiences]. Sucht. 2008, 54: 279-287.CrossRef
5.
Cunningham JA, Wild TC, Cordingley J, van Mierlo T, Humphreys K: A randomized controlled trial of an Internet-based intervention for alcohol abusers. Addiction. 2009, 104: 2023-2032. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02726.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Postel MG, de Jong CA, de Haan HA: Does E-therapy for problem drinking reach hidden populations?. Am J Psychiatry. 2005, 162: 2393-CrossRefPubMed
7.
Riper H, Kramer J, Smit F, Conijn B, Schippers GM, Cuijpers P: Web-based self-help for problem drinkers: a pragmatic randomized trial. Addiction. 2008, 103: 218-227. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02063.x.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Blankers M, Koeter MWJ, Schippers GM: Internet Therapy Versus Internet Self-Help Versus No Treatment for Problematic Alcohol Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011, 79: 330-341.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Postel MG, de Haan HA, ter Huurne ED, Becker ES, de Jong CAJ: Effectiveness of a Web-based Intervention for Problem Drinkers and Reasons for Dropout: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2010, 12: e68-10.2196/jmir.1642.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Rooke S, Thorsteinsson E, Karpin A, Copeland J, Allsop D: Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2010, 105: 1381-1390. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02975.x.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Smit F, Riper H, Schippers GM, Cuijpers P: Cost-effectiveness of a web-based self-help intervention for problem drinking: randomized trial. Curbing problem drinking in the digital galaxy. Edited by: Riper H. 2008, Amsterdam: PhD thesis, 41-64.
12.
Adamson SJ: Douglas Sellman J, Frampton CMA: Patient predictors of alcohol treatment outcome: A systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009, 36: 75-86. 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.05.007.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Ciraulo DA, Piechniczek-Buczek J, Iscan EN: Outcome predictors in substance use disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2003, 26: 381-409. 10.1016/S0193-953X(02)00106-5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Bodin MC, Romelso A: Predictors of 2-year drinking outcomes in a Swedish treatment sample. Eur Addict Res. 2007, 13: 136-143. 10.1159/000101549.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Moyer A, Finney W, Swearingen CE, Vergun P: Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non treatment-seeking populations. Addiction. 2002, 97: 279-292. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00018.x.CrossRefPubMed
16.
McKay JR, Weiss RV: A Review of Temporal Effects and Outcome Predictors in Substance Abuse Treatment Studies With Long-Term Follow-Ups. Preliminary Results and Methodological Issues. Eval Rev. 2001, 25: 113-159. 10.1177/0193841X0102500202.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Bandura A: The anatomy of stages of change. Am J Health Promot. 1997, 12: 8-10. 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Cox WM, Pothos EM, Hosier SG: Cognitive-motivational predictors of excessive drinkers’ success in changing. Psychopharmacology. 2007, 192: 499-510. 10.1007/s00213-007-0736-9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Project MATCH Research Group: Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH post-treatment drinking outcome. J Stud Alcohol. 1997, 58: 7-29.CrossRef
20.
Staines G, Magura S, Rosenblum A, Fong C, Kosanke N, Foote J, Deluca A: Predictors of drinking outcomes among alcoholics. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2003, 29: 203-218. 10.1081/ADA-120018847.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Vielva I, Iraurgi L: Cognitive and behavioural factors as predictors of abstinence following treatment for alcohol dependence. Addiction. 2001, 96: 297-303. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96229713.x.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Greenfield SF, Brooks AJ, Gordon SM, Green CA, Kropp F, McHugh RK, Lincoln M, Hien D, Miele GM: Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: A review of the literature. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006, 86: 1-21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Ryan RM, Plant RW, O’Malley S: Initial Motivations for Alcohol Treatment: Relations with Patient Characteristics, Treatment Involvement, and Dropout. Addict Behav. 1995, 20: 279-297. 10.1016/0306-4603(94)00072-7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Dobkin PL, De Civita M, Paraherakis A, Gill K: The role of functional support in treatment retention and outcomes among outpatient adult substance abusers. Addiction. 2002, 97: 347-356. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00083.x.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Compton W, Cottler L, Jacobs J, Ben-Abdallah A, Spitznagel E: The role of psychiatric disorders in predicting drug dependence treatment outcomes. Am J Psychiatry. 2003, 160: 890-895. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.5.890.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Moos RH, Finney JW, Cronkite RC: Alcoholism treatment: Context, Process and Outcome. 1990, New York: Oxford University Press
27.
Myers MG, Stewart DG, Brown SA: Progression from conduct disorder to antisocial personality disorder following treatment for adolescent substance abuse. Am J Psychiatry. 1998, 155: 479-485.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Rounsaville BJ, Tierney T, Crits-Christoph K, Weissman MM, Kleber HD: Predictors of Outcome in Treatment of Opiate Addicts: Evidence for the Multidimensional Nature of Addicts’ Problems. Compr Psychiatry. 1982, 23: 462-478. 10.1016/0010-440X(82)90160-2.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Riper H, Kramer J, Keuken M, Smit F, Schippers GM, Cuijpers P: Predicting Successful Treatment Outcome of Web-Based Self-help for Problem Drinkers: Secondary Analysis from a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2008, 10: e46-10.2196/jmir.1102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Hellemann G, Conner B, Anglin MD, Longshore D: Seeing the trees despite the forest: Applying recursive partitioning to the evaluation of drug treatment retention. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009, 36: 59-64. 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.03.005.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C: Classification and Regression Trees. 1984, Belmont (CA): Wadsworth
32.
Swan GE, Javitz HS, Jack LM, Curry SJ, McAfee T: Heterogeneity in 12-month outcome among female and male smokers. Addiction. 2004, 99: 237-250. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00629.x.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Yonkers KA, Gotman N, Kershaw T, Forray A, Howell HB, Rounsaville BJ: Screening for Prenatal Substance Use: Development of the Substance Use Risk Profile-Pregnancy Scale. Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 116: 827-833. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ed8290.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
United Nations Educational: Scientific and Cultural Organization: International standard classification of education (ISCED) 1997. 1997, Paris, France: UNESCO
35.
Dolan P: Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997, 35: 1095-1108. 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002.CrossRefPubMed
36.
de Wildt W: Achilles Leefstijl 1 [Achilles Lifestyle 1]. 2000, Zeist: Cure & Care publishers
37.
38.
Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, De la Fuente JR, Grant M: Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. Addiction. 1993, 88: 791-804. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Reinert DF, Allen JP: The alcohol use disorders identification test: an update of research findings. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007, 31: 185-199. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00295.x.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Flanagan JC: A research approach to improving our quality of life. Am J Psychol. 1978, 33: 138-147.CrossRef
41.
Group EQ: EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990, 16: 199-208.CrossRef
42.
Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N: The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983, 13: 596-605.CrossRef
43.
Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A: Work Ability Index. 1998, Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 2
44.
Burckhardt CS, Anderson KL, Archenholtz B, Hägg O: The Flanagan Quality Of Life Scale: evidence of construct validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003, 1: 59-10.1186/1477-7525-1-59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Günther O, Roick C, Angermeyer MC, König HH: The EQ-5D in alcohol dependent patients: relationships among health-related quality of life, psychopathology and social functioning. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 86: 253-264. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.07.001.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Radkiewich P, Widerszal-Bazyl M: Psychometric Properties of Work Ability Index in the Light of Comparative Survey Study. International Congress Series 1280. 2005, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 304-309.
47.
British Medical Association: Alcohol: Guidelines on Sensible Drinking. 1995, London: BMA
48.
Blankers M, Koeter MWJ, Schippers GM: Evaluating real-time Internet therapy and online self-help for problematic alcohol consumers: a three-arm RCT protocol. BMC Publ Health. 2009, 9: e16-10.1186/1471-2458-9-16.CrossRef
49.
Bendel RB, Afifi AA: Comparison of stopping rules in forward regression. J Am Stat Ass. 1977, 72: 46-53.
50.
Menard S: Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. 2001, Thousand Oask, CA: Sage, 64-
51.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression. 2000, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2CrossRef
52.
Strobl C, Malley J, Tutz G: An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychol Methods. 2009, 14: 323-348.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Zhang H, Singer B: Recursive partitioning in the health sciences. 1999, New York: Springer VerlagCrossRef
54.
55.
R Development Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2010, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
56.
Therneau TM, Atkinson EJ: An introduction to recursive partitioning using the RPART routines. 1997, Minnesota: Mayo Clinic
57.
Blankers M, Koeter MWJ, Schippers GM: Missing data approaches in eHealth research: simulation study and a tutorial for non-mathematically inclined researchers. J Med Internet Res. 2010, 12: e54-10.2196/jmir.1448.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Merkle EC, Shaffer VA: Binary recursive partitioning: Background, methods, and application to psychology. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2011, 64: 161-181. 10.1348/000711010X503129.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Hawkins DM: FIRM: Formal Inference-based Recursive Modeling, PC Version, Release 2.1 (Technical Report 546). 1997, Minnesota: University of Minnesota, School of Statistics
60.
Project MATCH, Group R: Matching patients with alcohol disorders to treatments: Clinical implications from Project MATCH. J Ment Health. 1998, 7: 589-602. 10.1080/09638239817743.CrossRef
61.
van den Brink W, Schippers GM: Staging and profiling in addiction. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2012, 54: 941-948.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Baseline predictors of treatment outcome in Internet-based alcohol interventions: a recursive partitioning analysis alongside a randomized trial
Authors
Matthijs Blankers
Maarten WJ Koeter
Gerard M Schippers
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-455

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Public Health 1/2013 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Study protocol: evaluation of a parenting and stress management programme: a randomised controlled trial of Triple P Discussion Groups and Stress Control

Research article

Multivariable analysis of the association between fathers’ and youths’ physical activity in the United States

Research article

Individual and contextual factors of influence on adherence to antiretrovirals among people attending public clinics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Study protocol

Unravelling the impact of ethnicity on health in Europe: the HELIUS study

Research article

Do preschools differ in promoting children’s physical activity? An instrument for the assessment of preschool physical activity programmes

Research article

Explaining the social gradient in sickness absence: a study of a general working population in Sweden