Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 7/2014

01-07-2014 | Original Article

Baseline factors predictive of patient satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation for idiopathic fecal incontinence

Authors: Jakob Duelund-Jakobsen, Bart van Wunnik, Steen Buntzen, Lilli Lundby, Søren Laurberg, Cor Baeten

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 7/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established treatment for fecal incontinence (FI). A recent study from our group found that the relationship between patient satisfaction and clinical outcome is complex and does not match the traditional used success criteria. Therefore, the ability to predict patient satisfaction must be given priority. The aim of the present study is to identify baseline factors predictive of patient satisfaction, with SNM, for idiopathic FI.

Methods

We analyzed data from patients treated with SNM for idiopathic FI in Aarhus, Denmark, and Maastricht, The Netherlands. A questionnaire considering self-reported satisfaction was mailed to these patients and compared to baseline characteristics. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive value of baseline demographic and diagnostic variables.

Results

In total, 131 patients were included in the analysis. Patient satisfaction with the current treatment result was reported in 75 patients. Fifty-six patients were dissatisfied with SNM treatment, after median 46 months (range 11–122) with permanent implantation. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) was the solely identified predictor for long-term patient satisfaction. A subgroup univariate-logistic regression analysis showed that PNTML ≤2.3 ms at the side of lead implantation was a statistically significant predictor for patient satisfaction (odds ratio (OR) 2.3, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01–5.24, p = 0.048).

Conclusion

Baseline PNTML measurement may be predictive of long-term satisfaction with SNM therapy for idiopathic FI. Further studies are needed to confirm this result.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP (1995) Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 346(8983):1124–1127PubMedCrossRef Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP (1995) Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 346(8983):1124–1127PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chan MK, Tjandra JJ (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: external anal sphincter defect vs. intact anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 51(7):1015–1024, discussion 1024-5PubMedCrossRef Chan MK, Tjandra JJ (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: external anal sphincter defect vs. intact anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 51(7):1015–1024, discussion 1024-5PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG (2008) Is a morphologically intact anal sphincter necessary for success with sacral nerve modulation in patients with faecal incontinence? Colorectal Dis 10(3):257–262PubMedCrossRef Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG (2008) Is a morphologically intact anal sphincter necessary for success with sacral nerve modulation in patients with faecal incontinence? Colorectal Dis 10(3):257–262PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference de Miguel M, Oteiza F, Ciga MA, Armendariz P, Marzo J, Ortiz H (2009) Sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 13(1):72–7 de Miguel M, Oteiza F, Ciga MA, Armendariz P, Marzo J, Ortiz H (2009) Sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 13(1):72–7
5.
go back to reference Lundby L, Krogh K, Buntzen S, Laurberg S (2008) Temporary sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 51(7):1074–1078PubMedCrossRef Lundby L, Krogh K, Buntzen S, Laurberg S (2008) Temporary sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 51(7):1074–1078PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Matzel KE, Kamm MA, Stosser M, Baeten CG, Christiansen J, Madoff R et al (2004) Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet 363(9417):1270–1276PubMedCrossRef Matzel KE, Kamm MA, Stosser M, Baeten CG, Christiansen J, Madoff R et al (2004) Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet 363(9417):1270–1276PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG (2007) Sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence: results of the first 100 permanent implantations. Colorectal Dis 9(8):725–730PubMedCrossRef Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG (2007) Sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence: results of the first 100 permanent implantations. Colorectal Dis 9(8):725–730PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Michelsen HB, Thompson-Fawcett M, Lundby L, Krogh K, Laurberg S, Buntzen S (2010) Six years of experience with sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 53(4):414–421PubMedCrossRef Michelsen HB, Thompson-Fawcett M, Lundby L, Krogh K, Laurberg S, Buntzen S (2010) Six years of experience with sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 53(4):414–421PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hull T, Giese C, Wexner SD, Mellgren A, Devroede G, Madoff RD et al (2013) Long-term durability of sacral nerve stimulation therapy for chronic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 56(2):234–245PubMedCrossRef Hull T, Giese C, Wexner SD, Mellgren A, Devroede G, Madoff RD et al (2013) Long-term durability of sacral nerve stimulation therapy for chronic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 56(2):234–245PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference van Wunnik BP, Govaert B, Leong R, Nieman FH, Baeten CG (2011) Patient experience and satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation: results of a single-center sample survey. Dis Colon Rectum 54(1):95–100PubMedCrossRef van Wunnik BP, Govaert B, Leong R, Nieman FH, Baeten CG (2011) Patient experience and satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation: results of a single-center sample survey. Dis Colon Rectum 54(1):95–100PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Duelund-Jakobsen J, van Wunnik B, Buntzen S, Lundby L, Baeten C, Laurberg S (2012) Functional results and patient satisfaction with sacral nerve stimulation for idiopathic faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 14(6):753–759PubMedCrossRef Duelund-Jakobsen J, van Wunnik B, Buntzen S, Lundby L, Baeten C, Laurberg S (2012) Functional results and patient satisfaction with sacral nerve stimulation for idiopathic faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 14(6):753–759PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C et al (2010) Fourth international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 29(1):213–240PubMedCrossRef Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C et al (2010) Fourth international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 29(1):213–240PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ryhammer AM, Laurberg S, Hermann AP (1997) Test-retest repeatability of anorectal physiology tests in healthy volunteers. Dis Colon Rectum 40(3):287–292PubMedCrossRef Ryhammer AM, Laurberg S, Hermann AP (1997) Test-retest repeatability of anorectal physiology tests in healthy volunteers. Dis Colon Rectum 40(3):287–292PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Meunier PD, Gallavardin D (1993) Anorectal manometry: the state of the art. Dig Dis 11(4-5):252–264PubMedCrossRef Meunier PD, Gallavardin D (1993) Anorectal manometry: the state of the art. Dig Dis 11(4-5):252–264PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Krogh K, Ryhammer AM, Lundby L, Gregersen H, Laurberg TS (2001) Comparison of methods used for measurement of rectal compliance. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):199–206PubMedCrossRef Krogh K, Ryhammer AM, Lundby L, Gregersen H, Laurberg TS (2001) Comparison of methods used for measurement of rectal compliance. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):199–206PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kiff ES, Swash M (1984) Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 71(8):614–616PubMedCrossRef Kiff ES, Swash M (1984) Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 71(8):614–616PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA (1988) Electrical stimulation in the clinical management of the neurogenic bladder. J Urol 140(6):1331–1339PubMed Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA (1988) Electrical stimulation in the clinical management of the neurogenic bladder. J Urol 140(6):1331–1339PubMed
18.
go back to reference Ganio E, Luc AR, Clerico G, Trompetto M (2001) Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence: a novel approach for intractable fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44(5):619–629, discussion 629-31PubMedCrossRef Ganio E, Luc AR, Clerico G, Trompetto M (2001) Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence: a novel approach for intractable fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44(5):619–629, discussion 629-31PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Leroi AM, Damon H, Faucheron JL, Lehur PA, Siproudhis L, Slim K et al (2009) Sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence: position statement based on a collective experience. Colorectal Dis 11(6):572–583PubMedCrossRef Leroi AM, Damon H, Faucheron JL, Lehur PA, Siproudhis L, Slim K et al (2009) Sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence: position statement based on a collective experience. Colorectal Dis 11(6):572–583PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1):77–97PubMedCrossRef Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1):77–97PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG et al (2000) Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):9–16, discussion 16-7PubMedCrossRef Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG et al (2000) Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):9–16, discussion 16-7PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gilliland R, Altomare DF, Moreira H Jr, Oliveira L, Gilliland JE, Wexner SD (1998) Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 41(12):1516–1522PubMedCrossRef Gilliland R, Altomare DF, Moreira H Jr, Oliveira L, Gilliland JE, Wexner SD (1998) Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 41(12):1516–1522PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Leroi AM, Dorival MP, Lecouturier MF, Saiter C, Welter ML, Touchais JY et al (1999) Pudendal neuropathy and severity of incontinence but not presence of an anal sphincter defect may determine the response to biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 42(6):762–769PubMedCrossRef Leroi AM, Dorival MP, Lecouturier MF, Saiter C, Welter ML, Touchais JY et al (1999) Pudendal neuropathy and severity of incontinence but not presence of an anal sphincter defect may determine the response to biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 42(6):762–769PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Petrolino M, Ripetti V, Masin A, Ratto C et al (2004) Reliability of electrophysiologic anal tests in predicting the outcome of sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 47(6):853–857PubMedCrossRef Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Petrolino M, Ripetti V, Masin A, Ratto C et al (2004) Reliability of electrophysiologic anal tests in predicting the outcome of sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 47(6):853–857PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Michelsen HB, Christensen P, Krogh K, Rosenkilde M, Buntzen S, Theil J et al (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence alters colorectal transport. Br J Surg 95(6):779–784PubMedCrossRef Michelsen HB, Christensen P, Krogh K, Rosenkilde M, Buntzen S, Theil J et al (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence alters colorectal transport. Br J Surg 95(6):779–784PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Michelsen HB, Worsoe J, Krogh K, Lundby L, Christensen P, Buntzen S et al (2010) Rectal motility after sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil 22(1):36–41, e6PubMed Michelsen HB, Worsoe J, Krogh K, Lundby L, Christensen P, Buntzen S et al (2010) Rectal motility after sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil 22(1):36–41, e6PubMed
29.
go back to reference Lundby L, Moller A, Buntzen S, Krogh K, Vang K, Gjedde A et al (2011) Relief of fecal incontinence by sacral nerve stimulation linked to focal brain activation. Dis Colon Rectum 54(3):318–323PubMedCrossRef Lundby L, Moller A, Buntzen S, Krogh K, Vang K, Gjedde A et al (2011) Relief of fecal incontinence by sacral nerve stimulation linked to focal brain activation. Dis Colon Rectum 54(3):318–323PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Griffin KM, Pickering M, O'Herlihy C, O'Connell PR, Jones JF (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation increases activation of the primary somatosensory cortex by anal canal stimulation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 98(8):1160–1169PubMedCrossRef Griffin KM, Pickering M, O'Herlihy C, O'Connell PR, Jones JF (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation increases activation of the primary somatosensory cortex by anal canal stimulation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 98(8):1160–1169PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gourcerol G, Gallas S, Michot F, Denis P, Leroi AM (2007) Sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence: are there factors associated with success? Dis Colon Rectum 50(1):3–12PubMedCrossRef Gourcerol G, Gallas S, Michot F, Denis P, Leroi AM (2007) Sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence: are there factors associated with success? Dis Colon Rectum 50(1):3–12PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wang JY, Patterson TR, Hart SL, Varma MG (2008) Fecal incontinence: does age matter? Characteristics of older vs younger women presenting for treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 51(4):426–431PubMedCrossRef Wang JY, Patterson TR, Hart SL, Varma MG (2008) Fecal incontinence: does age matter? Characteristics of older vs younger women presenting for treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 51(4):426–431PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Govaert B, Melenhorst J, Nieman FH, Bols EM, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG (2009) Factors associated with percutaneous nerve evaluation and permanent sacral nerve modulation outcome in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 52(10):1688–1694PubMedCrossRef Govaert B, Melenhorst J, Nieman FH, Bols EM, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG (2009) Factors associated with percutaneous nerve evaluation and permanent sacral nerve modulation outcome in patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 52(10):1688–1694PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Dudding TC, Pares D, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2008) Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: a 10-year cohort analysis. Colorectal Dis 10(3):249–256PubMedCrossRef Dudding TC, Pares D, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2008) Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: a 10-year cohort analysis. Colorectal Dis 10(3):249–256PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Maeda Y, Norton C, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S (2010) Predictors of the outcome of percutaneous nerve evaluation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 97(7):1096–1102PubMedCrossRef Maeda Y, Norton C, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S (2010) Predictors of the outcome of percutaneous nerve evaluation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 97(7):1096–1102PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Gallas S, Michot F, Faucheron JL, Meurette G, Lehur PA, Barth X, Damon H, Mion F, Rullier E, Zerbib F, Sielezneff I, Ouaïssi M, Orsoni P, Desfourneaux V, Siproudhis L, Mathonnet M, Menard JF, Leroi AM, Club NEMO (2010) Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: results of trial stimulation in 200 patients. Colorectal Dis 13(6):689–96 Gallas S, Michot F, Faucheron JL, Meurette G, Lehur PA, Barth X, Damon H, Mion F, Rullier E, Zerbib F, Sielezneff I, Ouaïssi M, Orsoni P, Desfourneaux V, Siproudhis L, Mathonnet M, Menard JF, Leroi AM, Club NEMO (2010) Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: results of trial stimulation in 200 patients. Colorectal Dis 13(6):689–96
Metadata
Title
Baseline factors predictive of patient satisfaction with sacral neuromodulation for idiopathic fecal incontinence
Authors
Jakob Duelund-Jakobsen
Bart van Wunnik
Steen Buntzen
Lilli Lundby
Søren Laurberg
Cor Baeten
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 7/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1870-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2014

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 7/2014 Go to the issue