Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Original Article

Barriers to information provision regarding breast cancer and its treatment

Authors: Heather J. Campbell-Enns, Roberta L. Woodgate, Harvey M. Chochinov

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Women with breast cancer require information about their cancer and its treatment during the process of treatment decision-making, yet it is unclear if there are barriers to information support. This study explores the experience of making treatment decisions in breast cancer, paying particular attention to the barriers experienced to the provision of information.

Methods

Using a grounded theory methodology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 women with invasive breast cancer exploring the experience of treatment decision-making. Data was organized using ATLAS.ti software and analyzed using constant comparisons.

Results

Analysis of the data showed that barriers to cancer and treatment information include intrapersonal and interpersonal communication challenges (emotional distress, patient-provider communication, “making it personal,” access to information) which reside at different levels of the breast cancer experience (individual, dyad, group, organization). A model is provided to depict this experience.

Conclusions

Women want information about their cancer and its treatment and experience barriers to information provision at various levels. Satisfactory information provision cannot occur without addressing barriers at every level. Utilizing interprofessional models of care may minimize existing barriers to information provision and empower patients to make satisfying treatment decisions that are consistent with their individual wishes.
Literature
3.
7.
10.
go back to reference Arora NK, Johnson P, Gustafson DH et al (2002) Barriers to information access, perceived health competence, and psychosocial health outcomes: test of a mediation model in a breast cancer sample. Patient Educ Couns 47:37–46CrossRefPubMed Arora NK, Johnson P, Gustafson DH et al (2002) Barriers to information access, perceived health competence, and psychosocial health outcomes: test of a mediation model in a breast cancer sample. Patient Educ Couns 47:37–46CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jefford M, Tattersall MHN (2002) Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care. Lancet Oncol 3:629–637CrossRefPubMed Jefford M, Tattersall MHN (2002) Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care. Lancet Oncol 3:629–637CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Reynolds PM, Sanson-Fisher RW, Poole AD et al (1981) Cancer and communication: information-giving in an oncology clinic. Br Med J Clin Res Ed 282:1449–1451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reynolds PM, Sanson-Fisher RW, Poole AD et al (1981) Cancer and communication: information-giving in an oncology clinic. Br Med J Clin Res Ed 282:1449–1451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Hack TF, Degner LF, Dyck DG (1994) Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med 1982 39:279–289CrossRefPubMed Hack TF, Degner LF, Dyck DG (1994) Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med 1982 39:279–289CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, London Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, London
17.
go back to reference Charmaz K (2014) Constructing grounded theory, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks Charmaz K (2014) Constructing grounded theory, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks
20.
go back to reference Erblich J, Montgomery GH, Valdimarsdottir HB et al (2003) Biased cognitive processing of cancer-related information among women with family histories of breast cancer: evidence from a cancer stroop task. Health Psychol 22:235–244CrossRefPubMed Erblich J, Montgomery GH, Valdimarsdottir HB et al (2003) Biased cognitive processing of cancer-related information among women with family histories of breast cancer: evidence from a cancer stroop task. Health Psychol 22:235–244CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Servaes P, Verhagen CAHHVM, Bleijenberg G (2002) Relations between fatigue, neuropsychological functioning, and physical activity after treatment for breast carcinoma: daily self-report and objective behavior. Cancer 95:2017–2026. doi:10.1002/cncr.10891 CrossRefPubMed Servaes P, Verhagen CAHHVM, Bleijenberg G (2002) Relations between fatigue, neuropsychological functioning, and physical activity after treatment for breast carcinoma: daily self-report and objective behavior. Cancer 95:2017–2026. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​10891 CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Adler NE, Page AE (2008) Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. National Academies Press, Washington, DC Adler NE, Page AE (2008) Cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
27.
go back to reference D’haese S, Vinh-Hung V, Bijdekerke P et al (2000) The effect of timing of the provision of information on anxiety and satisfaction of cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. J Cancer Educ 15:223–227. doi:10.1080/08858190009528702 D’haese S, Vinh-Hung V, Bijdekerke P et al (2000) The effect of timing of the provision of information on anxiety and satisfaction of cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. J Cancer Educ 15:223–227. doi:10.​1080/​0885819000952870​2
28.
go back to reference Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1986) An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Ann Intern Med 104:410–418CrossRefPubMed Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1986) An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Ann Intern Med 104:410–418CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Young GJ, Charns MP, Desai K et al (1998) Patterns of coordination and clinical outcomes: a study of surgical services. Health Serv Res 33:1211–1236PubMedPubMedCentral Young GJ, Charns MP, Desai K et al (1998) Patterns of coordination and clinical outcomes: a study of surgical services. Health Serv Res 33:1211–1236PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Flocke SA, Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ (1998) The association of attributes of primary care with the delivery of clinical preventive services. Med Care 36:AS21–AS30CrossRefPubMed Flocke SA, Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ (1998) The association of attributes of primary care with the delivery of clinical preventive services. Med Care 36:AS21–AS30CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH et al (1998) Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract 47:213–220PubMed Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH et al (1998) Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract 47:213–220PubMed
33.
34.
go back to reference Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM et al (1997) The dynamics of change: cancer patients’ preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 8:857–863CrossRefPubMed Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM et al (1997) The dynamics of change: cancer patients’ preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 8:857–863CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Peate M, Meiser B, Friedlander M et al (2011) It’s now or never: fertility-related knowledge, decision-making preferences, and treatment intentions in young women with breast cancer—an Australian fertility decision aid collaborative group study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 29:1670–1677. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2462 CrossRef Peate M, Meiser B, Friedlander M et al (2011) It’s now or never: fertility-related knowledge, decision-making preferences, and treatment intentions in young women with breast cancer—an Australian fertility decision aid collaborative group study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 29:1670–1677. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2010.​31.​2462 CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Burton G, Dimbleby R (2006) Between ourselves: an introduction to interpersonal communication, 3rd edn. Bloomsbury Academic, London Burton G, Dimbleby R (2006) Between ourselves: an introduction to interpersonal communication, 3rd edn. Bloomsbury Academic, London
41.
go back to reference Holland JC, Bultz BD (2007) The NCCN guideline for distress management: a case for making distress the sixth vital sign. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 5:3–7CrossRef Holland JC, Bultz BD (2007) The NCCN guideline for distress management: a case for making distress the sixth vital sign. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 5:3–7CrossRef
42.
44.
Metadata
Title
Barriers to information provision regarding breast cancer and its treatment
Authors
Heather J. Campbell-Enns
Roberta L. Woodgate
Harvey M. Chochinov
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3730-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine