Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Community Health 3/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Paper

Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation: A Comparison of Rural and Urban Communities in South Carolina

Authors: Sei-Hill Kim, Andrea Tanner, Daniela B. Friedman, Caroline Foster, Caroline D. Bergeron

Published in: Journal of Community Health | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Analyzing data from a telephone survey of rural and urban residents in South Carolina, this study attempts to understand how to better promote clinical trials (CTs) in rural areas. To explore why participation is lower among the rural population, we examine two groups of potential barriers: structural and procedural barriers (limited accessibility, lack of awareness, lack of health insurance) and cognitive and psychological barriers (lack of knowledge, misperceptions, distrust, fear). We then make a series of comparisons between rural and urban residents to see whether rural residents are significantly different from urban residents in terms of structural/procedural and cognitive/psychological barriers they are facing. Findings indicate that there are no significant differences between rural and urban residents in their willingness to participate in a CT. However, rural residents were more likely to perceive limited access to CT sites and lack of awareness of available trials. Rural residents also indicated greater lack of knowledge about CTs. Finally, we found that distrust and fear were important barriers in shaping one’s willingness to participate in a CT. Implications of the findings are discussed in detail.
Literature
3.
go back to reference University of Pittsburgh Center for Rural Health Practice. (2004). Bridging the health divide, the rural public health research agenda. Retrieved 18 October 2010, from http://www.pitt.edu. University of Pittsburgh Center for Rural Health Practice. (2004). Bridging the health divide, the rural public health research agenda. Retrieved 18 October 2010, from http://​www.​pitt.​edu.
4.
go back to reference Cohen, G. I. (2003). Clinical research by community oncologists. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 53(2), 73–81.CrossRef Cohen, G. I. (2003). Clinical research by community oncologists. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 53(2), 73–81.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Maurer, L. H., Davis, T., Hammond, S., Smith, E., West, P., & Doolittle, M. (2001). Clinical trials in a rural population: Professional education aspects. Journal of Cancer Education, 16(2), 89–92.PubMed Maurer, L. H., Davis, T., Hammond, S., Smith, E., West, P., & Doolittle, M. (2001). Clinical trials in a rural population: Professional education aspects. Journal of Cancer Education, 16(2), 89–92.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Shavers, V. L., Lynch, C. F., & Burmeister, L. F. (2002). Racial differences in factors that influence the willingness to participate in medical research studies. Annals of Epidemiology, 12(4), 248–256.PubMedCrossRef Shavers, V. L., Lynch, C. F., & Burmeister, L. F. (2002). Racial differences in factors that influence the willingness to participate in medical research studies. Annals of Epidemiology, 12(4), 248–256.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tanner, A., Kim, S.-H., Friedman, D. B., Foster, C., & Bergeron, C. D. (in press). Barriers to medical research participation as perceived by clinical trial investigators: Communicating with rural and African American communities. Journal of Health Communication. Tanner, A., Kim, S.-H., Friedman, D. B., Foster, C., & Bergeron, C. D. (in press). Barriers to medical research participation as perceived by clinical trial investigators: Communicating with rural and African American communities. Journal of Health Communication.
8.
go back to reference Giuliano, A. R., Mokuau, N., Hughes, C., et al. (2000). Participation of minorities in cancer research: The influence of structural, cultural, and linguistic factors. Annals of Epidemiology, 10(8), S22–S34.PubMedCrossRef Giuliano, A. R., Mokuau, N., Hughes, C., et al. (2000). Participation of minorities in cancer research: The influence of structural, cultural, and linguistic factors. Annals of Epidemiology, 10(8), S22–S34.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jones, J. M., Nyhof-Young, J., Moric, J., Friedman, A., Wells, W., & Catton, P. (2006). Identifying motivations and barriers to patient participation in clinical trials. Journal of Cancer Education, 21(4), 237–242.PubMedCrossRef Jones, J. M., Nyhof-Young, J., Moric, J., Friedman, A., Wells, W., & Catton, P. (2006). Identifying motivations and barriers to patient participation in clinical trials. Journal of Cancer Education, 21(4), 237–242.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lara, P. N, Jr, Higdon, R., Lim, N., et al. (2001). Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: Identifying potential barriers to enrollment. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19(6), 1728–1733.PubMed Lara, P. N, Jr, Higdon, R., Lim, N., et al. (2001). Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: Identifying potential barriers to enrollment. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19(6), 1728–1733.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Du, W., Mood, D., Gadgeel, S., & Simon, M. S. (2008). An educational video to increase clinical trials enrollment among lung cancer patients. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 3(1), 23–29.PubMedCrossRef Du, W., Mood, D., Gadgeel, S., & Simon, M. S. (2008). An educational video to increase clinical trials enrollment among lung cancer patients. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 3(1), 23–29.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Baquet, C. R., Commiskey, P., Mullins, D., & Mishra, S. I. (2006). Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: Socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 30(1), 24–33.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Baquet, C. R., Commiskey, P., Mullins, D., & Mishra, S. I. (2006). Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: Socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 30(1), 24–33.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Comis, R. L., Miller, J. D., Aldigé, C. R., Krebs, L., & Stoval, E. (2003). Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(5), 830–835.PubMedCrossRef Comis, R. L., Miller, J. D., Aldigé, C. R., Krebs, L., & Stoval, E. (2003). Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(5), 830–835.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Advani, A. S., Atkeson, B., Brown, C. L., et al. (2003). Barriers to the participation of African-American patients with cancer in clinical trials: A pilot study. Cancer, 97(6), 1499–1506.PubMedCrossRef Advani, A. S., Atkeson, B., Brown, C. L., et al. (2003). Barriers to the participation of African-American patients with cancer in clinical trials: A pilot study. Cancer, 97(6), 1499–1506.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Association of Clinical Research Professionals (ACRP). (2009). Center watch 2008 national survey of study volunteer experiences. Paper presented at the ACRP global conference and exhibition. Association of Clinical Research Professionals (ACRP). (2009). Center watch 2008 national survey of study volunteer experiences. Paper presented at the ACRP global conference and exhibition.
16.
go back to reference Getz, K. A. (2008). Restoring public confidence in clinical research: Lessons from the organ donation sector. The Monitor, 2008, 59–62. Getz, K. A. (2008). Restoring public confidence in clinical research: Lessons from the organ donation sector. The Monitor, 2008, 59–62.
17.
go back to reference Frank, G. (2004). Current challenges in clinical trial patient recruitment and enrollment. SoCRA Source, 2(February), 30–38. Frank, G. (2004). Current challenges in clinical trial patient recruitment and enrollment. SoCRA Source, 2(February), 30–38.
19.
go back to reference Friedman, D. B., Bergeron, C. D., Foster, C., Tanner, A., & Kim, S. H. (2013). What do people really know and think about clinical trials? A comparison of rural and urban communities in the South. Journal of Community Health, 38(4), 642–651.PubMedCrossRef Friedman, D. B., Bergeron, C. D., Foster, C., Tanner, A., & Kim, S. H. (2013). What do people really know and think about clinical trials? A comparison of rural and urban communities in the South. Journal of Community Health, 38(4), 642–651.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Quinn, G. P., Bell, B. A., Bell, M. Y., et al. (2007). The guinea pig syndrome: Improving clinical trial participation among thoracic patients. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2(3), 191–196.PubMedCrossRef Quinn, G. P., Bell, B. A., Bell, M. Y., et al. (2007). The guinea pig syndrome: Improving clinical trial participation among thoracic patients. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2(3), 191–196.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sateren, W. B., Trimble, E. L., Abrams, J., et al. (2002). How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(8), 2109–2117.PubMedCrossRef Sateren, W. B., Trimble, E. L., Abrams, J., et al. (2002). How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(8), 2109–2117.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kelch, R. P. (2002). Maintaining the public trust in clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(4), 285–287.PubMedCrossRef Kelch, R. P. (2002). Maintaining the public trust in clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(4), 285–287.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Brown, D. R., Fouad, M. N., Basen-Engquist, K., & Tortolero-Luna, G. (2000). Recruitment and retention of minority women in cancer screening, prevention, and treatment trials. Annals of Epidemiology, 10(8), S13–S21.PubMedCrossRef Brown, D. R., Fouad, M. N., Basen-Engquist, K., & Tortolero-Luna, G. (2000). Recruitment and retention of minority women in cancer screening, prevention, and treatment trials. Annals of Epidemiology, 10(8), S13–S21.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Shavers-Hornaday, V. L., Lynch, C. F., Burmeister, L. F., & Torner, J. C. (1997). Why are African Americans under-represented in medical research studies? Impediments to participation. Ethnicity and Health, 2(1/2), 31–45.PubMedCrossRef Shavers-Hornaday, V. L., Lynch, C. F., Burmeister, L. F., & Torner, J. C. (1997). Why are African Americans under-represented in medical research studies? Impediments to participation. Ethnicity and Health, 2(1/2), 31–45.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Chan, L., Hart, G., & Goodman, D. C. (2006). Geographic access to health care for rural Medicare beneficiaries. Journal of Rural Health, 22(2), 140–146.PubMedCrossRef Chan, L., Hart, G., & Goodman, D. C. (2006). Geographic access to health care for rural Medicare beneficiaries. Journal of Rural Health, 22(2), 140–146.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Miller, J. D. (1987). Scientific literacy in the United States. In D. Evered & M. O’Connor (Eds.), Communicating science to the public (pp. 19–40). London: Wiley. Miller, J. D. (1987). Scientific literacy in the United States. In D. Evered & M. O’Connor (Eds.), Communicating science to the public (pp. 19–40). London: Wiley.
27.
go back to reference Miller, J. D., Pardo, R., & Niwa, F. (1997). Public perceptions of science and technology: A comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Madrid: BBV Foundation Press. Miller, J. D., Pardo, R., & Niwa, F. (1997). Public perceptions of science and technology: A comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Madrid: BBV Foundation Press.
29.
go back to reference American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2011). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (7th ed.). Deerfield, IL: AAPOR. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2011). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (7th ed.). Deerfield, IL: AAPOR.
30.
go back to reference Lee, C.-J., & Scheufele, D. A. (2006). The influence of knowledge and deference toward scientific authority: A media effects model for public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 819–834.CrossRef Lee, C.-J., & Scheufele, D. A. (2006). The influence of knowledge and deference toward scientific authority: A media effects model for public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 819–834.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ho, S. S., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2011). Factors influencing public risk-benefit considerations of nanotechnology: Assessing the effects of mass media, interpersonal communication, and elaborative processing. Public Understanding of Science, 22(5), 606–623.PubMedCrossRef Ho, S. S., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2011). Factors influencing public risk-benefit considerations of nanotechnology: Assessing the effects of mass media, interpersonal communication, and elaborative processing. Public Understanding of Science, 22(5), 606–623.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation: A Comparison of Rural and Urban Communities in South Carolina
Authors
Sei-Hill Kim
Andrea Tanner
Daniela B. Friedman
Caroline Foster
Caroline D. Bergeron
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Community Health / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9798-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Journal of Community Health 3/2014 Go to the issue