Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Asia Pacific Family Medicine 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research

Barriers and facilitators affecting vasectomy acceptability (a multi stages study in a sample from north eastern of Iran), 2005-2007

Authors: Afsaneh Keramat, Afsaneh Zarei, Masoumeh Arabi

Published in: Asia Pacific Family Medicine | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In this study we aimed to find factors affecting vasectomy acceptability in Shahroud (north eastern Iran).

Methods

This study was carried out in three stages. The first stage was a survey of couples that had the vasectomy procedure during 2004-2007 in the Shahroud area. In the second stage of the study we compared characteristics of the cases (the couples who had the vasectomy procedure during the study period) and controls (including couples with at least one child that choose other contraceptive methods excluding a vasectomy) using χ² and T student tests. In the third stage of the study we aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of those who did not choose to have a vasectomy as there contraception method by filling out questionnaires in personal interviews.

Results

An increasing trend toward the vasectomy procedure was observed during 2005 to 2007. We found positive associations between male and female educational levels and choosing to have a vasectomy (p < 0.05). Majority of women (88.44%) thought that their husbands would prefer to have a tubectomy to a vasectomy.

Conclusion

The study results show a necessity for both couples to participate in educational programs about the vasectomy procedure.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Roy J, Pile JM: "Vasectomy: The Unfinished Agenda." ACQUIRE Project Working Paper. 2007. Roy J, Pile JM: "Vasectomy: The Unfinished Agenda." ACQUIRE Project Working Paper. 2007.
3.
go back to reference Pile JM, Barone MA: Demographics of vasectomy--USA and international. Urol Clin North Am 2009,36(3):295–305. 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.05.006PubMedCrossRef Pile JM, Barone MA: Demographics of vasectomy--USA and international. Urol Clin North Am 2009,36(3):295–305. 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.05.006PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Garcia Moreno J, Solano Sainos LM: Acceptance and rejection of vasectomy in rural males. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2005,43(3):205–14.PubMed Garcia Moreno J, Solano Sainos LM: Acceptance and rejection of vasectomy in rural males. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2005,43(3):205–14.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Barone MA, Johnson CH, Luick MA, Teutonico DL, Magnani RJ: Characteristics of men receiving vasectomy in the United States, 1998–1999. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2004,36(1):27–33. 10.1363/3602704PubMedCrossRef Barone MA, Johnson CH, Luick MA, Teutonico DL, Magnani RJ: Characteristics of men receiving vasectomy in the United States, 1998–1999. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2004,36(1):27–33. 10.1363/3602704PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Corey L: Vasectomy use worldwide as of 2009 review. Rollins School of Public Health at Emory 2009. Corey L: Vasectomy use worldwide as of 2009 review. Rollins School of Public Health at Emory 2009.
7.
go back to reference Country report on the population and family planning program in the Islamic Republic of Iran Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2003. Country report on the population and family planning program in the Islamic Republic of Iran Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2003.
10.
go back to reference Parsons MA, Wood HA: Demographic and socio-economic characteristics of men choosing vasectomy. J Biosoc Sci 1978, 10: 133–9.PubMedCrossRef Parsons MA, Wood HA: Demographic and socio-economic characteristics of men choosing vasectomy. J Biosoc Sci 1978, 10: 133–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eisenberg ML, Henderson JT, Amory JK, Smith JF, Walsh TJ: Racial differences in vasectomy utilization in the United States: data from the national survey of family growth. Urology 2009, 74: 1020–4. 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.042PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Eisenberg ML, Henderson JT, Amory JK, Smith JF, Walsh TJ: Racial differences in vasectomy utilization in the United States: data from the national survey of family growth. Urology 2009, 74: 1020–4. 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.042PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Subba N: Demographic assessment on vasectomy clients of Sankhuwasabha Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J 2003, 5: 98–9.PubMed Subba N: Demographic assessment on vasectomy clients of Sankhuwasabha Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J 2003, 5: 98–9.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Barone Mark, John Pile: "Demographics of Vasectomy-USA and International.". EngenderHealth 2009. Web. 21 Nov. 2009 Barone Mark, John Pile: "Demographics of Vasectomy-USA and International.". EngenderHealth 2009. Web. 21 Nov. 2009
15.
go back to reference Smith GL, Taylor GP, Smith KF: Comparative risks and costs of male and female sterilization. American Journal of Public Health 75(4):370–374. Smith GL, Taylor GP, Smith KF: Comparative risks and costs of male and female sterilization. American Journal of Public Health 75(4):370–374.
16.
go back to reference Schwingl PamelaJ, Guess HarryA: Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy. Fertility and Sterility 2000,73(5):923–936. 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00482-9PubMedCrossRef Schwingl PamelaJ, Guess HarryA: Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy. Fertility and Sterility 2000,73(5):923–936. 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00482-9PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Awsare NS, Krishnan J, Boustead GB, Hanbury DC, McNicholas TA: Complications of vasectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2005, 87: 406–10. 10.1308/003588405X71054PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Awsare NS, Krishnan J, Boustead GB, Hanbury DC, McNicholas TA: Complications of vasectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2005, 87: 406–10. 10.1308/003588405X71054PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kamyabi Z: A survey of the reasons for vasectomy refusal in couples who have chosen tubectomy as their contraceptive method. Saudi Med J 2002, 23: 752–4.PubMed Kamyabi Z: A survey of the reasons for vasectomy refusal in couples who have chosen tubectomy as their contraceptive method. Saudi Med J 2002, 23: 752–4.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Dibaba A: Rural men and their attitude towards vasectomy as means of contraception in Ethiopia. Trop Doct 2001, 31: 100–2.PubMed Dibaba A: Rural men and their attitude towards vasectomy as means of contraception in Ethiopia. Trop Doct 2001, 31: 100–2.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Bunce A, Guest G, Searing H, Frajzyngier V, Riwa P, Kanama J, et al.: Factors affecting vasectomy acceptability in Tanzania. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2007, 13–21. Bunce A, Guest G, Searing H, Frajzyngier V, Riwa P, Kanama J, et al.: Factors affecting vasectomy acceptability in Tanzania. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2007, 13–21.
21.
go back to reference Arevalo JA, Wollitzer AO, Arana S: Vasectomy: views of Latinos and white men. J Fam Pract 1987, 24: 493–6.PubMed Arevalo JA, Wollitzer AO, Arana S: Vasectomy: views of Latinos and white men. J Fam Pract 1987, 24: 493–6.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Marchi NM, de Alvarenga AT, Osis MJ, Bahamondes L: Contraceptive methods with male participation: a perspective of Brazilian couples. Int Nurs Rev 2008,55(1):103–9. 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00572.xPubMedCrossRef Marchi NM, de Alvarenga AT, Osis MJ, Bahamondes L: Contraceptive methods with male participation: a perspective of Brazilian couples. Int Nurs Rev 2008,55(1):103–9. 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00572.xPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Barriers and facilitators affecting vasectomy acceptability (a multi stages study in a sample from north eastern of Iran), 2005-2007
Authors
Afsaneh Keramat
Afsaneh Zarei
Masoumeh Arabi
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Asia Pacific Family Medicine / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1447-056X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1447-056X-10-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Asia Pacific Family Medicine 1/2011 Go to the issue