Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Bar Attachment | Research

A comparative study to evaluate microstrain of low-profile attachment associated with and without bar connection in implant assisted mandibular overdenture (in vitro study)

Authors: Norhan M. Ameen, Nabila M. El-Khodary, Ahmed M. Abdel-Hamid, Aml E. Fahmy

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the microstrain transmitted to peri-implant tissues of implant-assisted mandibular overdentures using two different low-profile attachment designs; OT- Equator attachment with and without bar attachment.

Materials and methods

A completely edentulous epoxy resin mandibular model was used, in which two parallel dental implants were inserted at the canine region bilaterally and one in the middle. Sixteen identical complete edentulous mandibular overdentures were fabricated following conventional, standardized techniques and were divided equally between two groups according to the design and placement of the OT-Equator. Group A implants were kept solitary with an OT-Equator attachment, while group B implants were kept splinted with a bar associated with two mini-OT-Equator attachments in between. Sixteen identical mandibular complete overdentures were constructed, to which attachments were picked up. The difference in stress distribution was measured using strain gauges and compared between the two studied groups. A vertical load of 100 N using the universal testing machine was applied unilaterally on the left mesial fossae of the mandibular first molar and bilaterally on the bar attached to the mandibular premolar molar region of the overdentures. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS version 28. Normality was checked by using the Shapiro-Wilk test and normality plots. The Mann-Whitney U test was then used to analogize the groups.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference between groups A and B upon application of vertical unilateral and bilateral loadings of 100 N, with mean microstrain values of P 0.05. Group A (OT-Equator attachment) showed lower strain values than Group B (OT-Equator bar attachment) upon application of vertical, unilateral, and bilateral loadings of 100 N.

Conclusions

Implant-assisted mandibular overdenture with a solitary attachment is associated with lower microstrain values around the implants after application of unilateral and bilateral vertical loadings of 100 N.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Eltaftazani I, Moubarak A, El-Anwar M. Locator Attachment Versus Ball Attachment: 3-Dimentional Finite Element Study2010. Eltaftazani I, Moubarak A, El-Anwar M. Locator Attachment Versus Ball Attachment: 3-Dimentional Finite Element Study2010.
3.
go back to reference Evtimovska E, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Romberg E. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time. J Prosthodont. 2009;18:479–83.CrossRefPubMed Evtimovska E, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Romberg E. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time. J Prosthodont. 2009;18:479–83.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hegazy SA, El Mekawy N, Emera RMK. Impact of implants number and attachment type on the peri-implant stresses and retention of palateless implant-retained overdenture. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31:414–9.CrossRefPubMed Hegazy SA, El Mekawy N, Emera RMK. Impact of implants number and attachment type on the peri-implant stresses and retention of palateless implant-retained overdenture. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31:414–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Wolfe RE. Symposium on semiprecision attachments in removable partial dentures. Extracoronal attachments. Dent Clin North Am. 1985;29:185–198. Wolfe RE. Symposium on semiprecision attachments in removable partial dentures. Extracoronal attachments. Dent Clin North Am. 1985;29:185–198.
6.
go back to reference Epstein DD, Epstein PL, Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK. Comparison of the retentive properties of six prefabricated post overdenture attachment systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:579–84.CrossRefPubMed Epstein DD, Epstein PL, Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK. Comparison of the retentive properties of six prefabricated post overdenture attachment systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:579–84.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gulizio MP, Agar JR, Kelly JR, Taylor TD. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments. J Prosthodont. 2005;14:3–11.CrossRefPubMed Gulizio MP, Agar JR, Kelly JR, Taylor TD. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments. J Prosthodont. 2005;14:3–11.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Marco M, Giuliano B, Luca O. Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported overdenture and a new protocol for bar passivation. Glob J Oral Sci. 2016;2:10–9.CrossRef Marco M, Giuliano B, Luca O. Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported overdenture and a new protocol for bar passivation. Glob J Oral Sci. 2016;2:10–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haruta A, Matsushita Y, Tsukiyama Y, Sawae Y, Sakai N, Koyano K. Effects of mucosal thickness on the stress distribution and denture stability of mandibular implant-supported overdentures with unsplinted attachments in vitro. J Dent Biomech. 2011;2011:894395.PubMedPubMedCentral Haruta A, Matsushita Y, Tsukiyama Y, Sawae Y, Sakai N, Koyano K. Effects of mucosal thickness on the stress distribution and denture stability of mandibular implant-supported overdentures with unsplinted attachments in vitro. J Dent Biomech. 2011;2011:894395.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Bernardes SR, de Araujo CA, Neto AJ, Simamoto Junior P, das Neves FD. Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant-abutment interfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:781–9.PubMed Bernardes SR, de Araujo CA, Neto AJ, Simamoto Junior P, das Neves FD. Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant-abutment interfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:781–9.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Glantz PO, Rangert B, Svensson A, Stafford GD, Arnvidarson B, Randow K, et al. On clinical loading of osseointegrated implants. A methodological and clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993;4:99–105.CrossRefPubMed Glantz PO, Rangert B, Svensson A, Stafford GD, Arnvidarson B, Randow K, et al. On clinical loading of osseointegrated implants. A methodological and clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993;4:99–105.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Elsyad M, Errabti HM, Mustafa AZ. Mandibular denture base deformation with Locator and Ball attachments of Implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:656–64.CrossRefPubMed Elsyad M, Errabti HM, Mustafa AZ. Mandibular denture base deformation with Locator and Ball attachments of Implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:656–64.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yoo JS, Kwon KR, Noh K, Lee H, Paek J. Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: comparative study with differences in the denture base length. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9:143–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yoo JS, Kwon KR, Noh K, Lee H, Paek J. Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: comparative study with differences in the denture base length. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9:143–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Takeshita S, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems. Dent Mater J. 2011;30:928–34.CrossRefPubMed Takeshita S, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems. Dent Mater J. 2011;30:928–34.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Akça K, Akkocaoglu M, Cömert A, Tekdemir I, Cehreli MC. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:101–9.PubMed Akça K, Akkocaoglu M, Cömert A, Tekdemir I, Cehreli MC. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:101–9.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Leão RS, Moraes SLD, Vasconcelos BCE, Lemos CAA, Pellizzer EP. Splinted and unsplinted overdenture attachment systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:647–56.CrossRefPubMed Leão RS, Moraes SLD, Vasconcelos BCE, Lemos CAA, Pellizzer EP. Splinted and unsplinted overdenture attachment systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:647–56.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, deLlanos-Lanchares H, Martin-Fernandez E, Brizuela-Velasco A, Ellacuria-Echebarria J. Effect of implant- and occlusal load location on stress distribution in Locator attachments of mandibular overdenture. A finite element study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9:371–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, deLlanos-Lanchares H, Martin-Fernandez E, Brizuela-Velasco A, Ellacuria-Echebarria J. Effect of implant- and occlusal load location on stress distribution in Locator attachments of mandibular overdenture. A finite element study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9:371–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Mousa MA, Jamayet N, Lynch E, Husein A. Biomechanical stress in removable complete dental prostheses: a narrative review of finite element studies. J Int Oral Health. 2020;12:413–9. Mousa MA, Jamayet N, Lynch E, Husein A. Biomechanical stress in removable complete dental prostheses: a narrative review of finite element studies. J Int Oral Health. 2020;12:413–9.
Metadata
Title
A comparative study to evaluate microstrain of low-profile attachment associated with and without bar connection in implant assisted mandibular overdenture (in vitro study)
Authors
Norhan M. Ameen
Nabila M. El-Khodary
Ahmed M. Abdel-Hamid
Aml E. Fahmy
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03702-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue