Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Back Pain | Research article

The association between believing staying active is beneficial and achieving a clinically relevant functional improvement after 52 weeks: a prospective cohort study of patients with chronic low back pain in secondary care

Authors: Allan Riis, Emma Louise Karran, Janus Laust Thomsen, Anette Jørgensen, Søren Holst, Nanna Rolving

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

According to clinical guidelines, advice to stay active despite experiencing pain is recommended to patients with non-specific low back pain (LBP). However, not all patients receive guideline-concordant information and advice, and some patients still believe that activity avoidance will help them recover. The purpose was to study whether guideline-concordant beliefs among patients and other explanatory variables were associated with recovery. The main aim was to investigate whether believing staying active despite having pain is associated with a better functional outcome.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study involving adults with non-specific LBP referred from general practices to the Spine Centre at Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Denmark. Patients reported on their beliefs about the importance of finding the cause, the importance of diagnostic imaging, perceiving to have received advice to stay active, pain duration, pain intensity, and STarT Back Tool. Agreeing to: ‘An increase in pain is an indication that I should stop what I’m doing until the pain decreases’ adjusted for age, gender, and education level was the primary explanatory analysis. A 30% improvement in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score after 52 weeks was the outcome.

Results

816 patients were included and 596 (73.0%) agreed that pain is a warning signal to stop being active. Among patients not considering pain as a warning signal, 80 (43.2%) had a favourable functional improvement of ≥30% on the RMDQ compared to 201 (41.2%) among patients considering pain a warning signal. No difference was found between the two groups (adjusted P = 0.542 and unadjusted P = 0.629). However, STarT Back Tool high-risk patients had a less favourable functional outcome (adjusted P = 0.003 and unadjusted P = 0.002). Chronic pain was associated with less favourable functional outcome (adjusted P < 0.001 and unadjusted P < 0.001), whereas beliefs about finding the cause, diagnostic imaging, perceiving to have received advice to stay active, or pain intensity were not significantly associated with outcome.

Conclusions

Holding the single belief that pain is a warning signal to stop being active was not associated with functional outcome. However, patients characterised by having multiple psychological barriers (high-risk according to the STarT Back Tool) had a less favourable functional outcome.

Trial registration

Registered at ClinicalTrials.​gov (registration number: NCT03058315), 20 February 2017.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Newton JN, Briggs AD, Murray CJ, Dicker D, Foreman KJ, Wang H, et al. Changes in health in England, with analysis by English regions and areas of deprivation, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00195-6 [pii]. Newton JN, Briggs AD, Murray CJ, Dicker D, Foreman KJ, Wang H, et al. Changes in health in England, with analysis by English regions and areas of deprivation, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015 doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(15)00195-6 [pii].
4.
go back to reference Wong JJ, Cote P, Sutton DA, Randhawa K, Yu H, Varatharajan S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the noninvasive management of low back pain: a systematic review by the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur J Pain. 2017;21(2):201.CrossRef Wong JJ, Cote P, Sutton DA, Randhawa K, Yu H, Varatharajan S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the noninvasive management of low back pain: a systematic review by the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur J Pain. 2017;21(2):201.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Weimer M, et al. Nonpharmacologic therapies for low Back pain: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):493.CrossRef Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Weimer M, et al. Nonpharmacologic therapies for low Back pain: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):493.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ, Traeger AC, Lin CC, Chenot JF, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(11):2791.CrossRef Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ, Traeger AC, Lin CC, Chenot JF, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(11):2791.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bishop FL, Dima AL, Ngui J, Little P, Moss-Morris R, Foster NE, Lewith GT. "lovely pie in the sky plans": a qualitative study of Clinicians' perspectives on guidelines for managing low Back pain in primary Care in England. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1842–50.CrossRef Bishop FL, Dima AL, Ngui J, Little P, Moss-Morris R, Foster NE, Lewith GT. "lovely pie in the sky plans": a qualitative study of Clinicians' perspectives on guidelines for managing low Back pain in primary Care in England. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:1842–50.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bishop A, Foster NE, Thomas E, Hay EM. How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists. Pain. 2008;135:187–95.CrossRef Bishop A, Foster NE, Thomas E, Hay EM. How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists. Pain. 2008;135:187–95.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Foster NE, Bishop A, Thomas E, Main C, Horne R, Weinman J, Hay E. Illness perceptions of low back pain patients in primary care: what are they, do they change and are they associated with outcome? Pain. 2008;136(1–2):177–87.CrossRef Foster NE, Bishop A, Thomas E, Main C, Horne R, Weinman J, Hay E. Illness perceptions of low back pain patients in primary care: what are they, do they change and are they associated with outcome? Pain. 2008;136(1–2):177–87.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Main CJ, Foster N, Buchbinder R. How important are back pain beliefs and expectations for satisfactory recovery from back pain? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(2):205–17.CrossRef Main CJ, Foster N, Buchbinder R. How important are back pain beliefs and expectations for satisfactory recovery from back pain? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(2):205–17.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Glasziou P, Haynes B. The paths from research to improved health outcomes. Evid Based Nurs. 2005;8:36–8.CrossRef Glasziou P, Haynes B. The paths from research to improved health outcomes. Evid Based Nurs. 2005;8:36–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low Back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560–71.CrossRef Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low Back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560–71.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Morton L, de Bruin M, Krajewska M, Whibley D, Macfarlane GJ. Beliefs about back pain and pain management behaviours, and their associations in the general population: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2019;23(1):15.CrossRef Morton L, de Bruin M, Krajewska M, Whibley D, Macfarlane GJ. Beliefs about back pain and pain management behaviours, and their associations in the general population: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2019;23(1):15.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007;335:806–808 doi:335/7624/806 [pii]. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 2007;335:806–808 doi:335/7624/806 [pii].
18.
go back to reference Pedersen KM, Andersen JS, Sondergaard J. General practice and primary health care in Denmark. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(Suppl 1):S34–8.CrossRef Pedersen KM, Andersen JS, Sondergaard J. General practice and primary health care in Denmark. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(Suppl 1):S34–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine. 1983;8(2):141–4.CrossRef Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine. 1983;8(2):141–4.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Jordan K, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Croft P. A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire for low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:45–52 doi:S0895-4356(05)00262-3 [pii].CrossRef Jordan K, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Croft P. A minimal clinically important difference was derived for the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire for low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:45–52 doi:S0895-4356(05)00262-3 [pii].CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Darlow B, Perry M, Stanley J, et al. Crosssectional survey of attitudes and beliefs about back pain in New Zealand. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004725.CrossRef Darlow B, Perry M, Stanley J, et al. Crosssectional survey of attitudes and beliefs about back pain in New Zealand. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004725.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Unsgaard-Tøndel M, Kregnes IG, Nilsen TIL, Marchand GH, Askim T. Risk classification of patients referred to secondary care for low back pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2018;19:166.CrossRef Unsgaard-Tøndel M, Kregnes IG, Nilsen TIL, Marchand GH, Askim T. Risk classification of patients referred to secondary care for low back pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2018;19:166.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variable. BMJ. 2006;332:1080.CrossRef Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variable. BMJ. 2006;332:1080.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Setchell J, Costa N, Ferreira M, Makovey J, Nielsen M, Hodges PW. Individuals' explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):466.CrossRef Setchell J, Costa N, Ferreira M, Makovey J, Nielsen M, Hodges PW. Individuals' explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):466.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Chou L, Ranger TA, Peiris W, Cicuttini FM, Urquhart DM, Sullivan K, et al. Patients' perceived needs for medical services for non-specific low back pain: a systematic scoping review. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0204885.CrossRef Chou L, Ranger TA, Peiris W, Cicuttini FM, Urquhart DM, Sullivan K, et al. Patients' perceived needs for medical services for non-specific low back pain: a systematic scoping review. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0204885.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Riis A, Rathleff MS, Jensen CE, Jensen MB. Predictive ability of the start back tool: an ancillary analysis of a low back pain trial from Danish general practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;23;18(1):360. Riis A, Rathleff MS, Jensen CE, Jensen MB. Predictive ability of the start back tool: an ancillary analysis of a low back pain trial from Danish general practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;23;18(1):360.
37.
go back to reference Storm L, Rousing R, Andersen MD, Carreon LY. Usefulness of the STarT Back Screening Tool to predict pain problems after lumbar spine surgery. Dan Med J. 2018;65(12). Storm L, Rousing R, Andersen MD, Carreon LY. Usefulness of the STarT Back Screening Tool to predict pain problems after lumbar spine surgery. Dan Med J. 2018;65(12).
38.
go back to reference Karran EL, McAuley JH, Traeger AC, Hillier SL, Grabherr L, Russek LN, Moseley GL. Can screening instruments accurately determine poor outcome risk in adults with recent onset low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):13.CrossRef Karran EL, McAuley JH, Traeger AC, Hillier SL, Grabherr L, Russek LN, Moseley GL. Can screening instruments accurately determine poor outcome risk in adults with recent onset low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):13.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Karran EL, Traeger AC, McAuley JH, Hillier SL, Yau YH, Moseley GL. The value of prognostic screening for patients with low Back pain in secondary care. J Pain. 2017;18(6):673.CrossRef Karran EL, Traeger AC, McAuley JH, Hillier SL, Yau YH, Moseley GL. The value of prognostic screening for patients with low Back pain in secondary care. J Pain. 2017;18(6):673.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Holt N, Mansell G, Hill JC, Pincus T. Testing a model of consultation-based reassurance and Back pain outcomes with psychological risk as moderator: a prospective cohort study. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(4):339.PubMed Holt N, Mansell G, Hill JC, Pincus T. Testing a model of consultation-based reassurance and Back pain outcomes with psychological risk as moderator: a prospective cohort study. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(4):339.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Holt N, Pincus T, Vogel S. Reassurance during low back pain consultations with GPs: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(639):e692–701.CrossRef Holt N, Pincus T, Vogel S. Reassurance during low back pain consultations with GPs: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(639):e692–701.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The association between believing staying active is beneficial and achieving a clinically relevant functional improvement after 52 weeks: a prospective cohort study of patients with chronic low back pain in secondary care
Authors
Allan Riis
Emma Louise Karran
Janus Laust Thomsen
Anette Jørgensen
Søren Holst
Nanna Rolving
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3062-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2020 Go to the issue