Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Awareness and attitude toward using dental magnification among dental students and residents at King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry

Authors: Turki Y. Alhazzazi, Nouran A. Alzebiani, Samaher K. Alotaibi, Dania F. Bogari, Ghaida T. Bakalka, Loai W. Hazzazi, Ahmed M. Jan, Neville J. McDonald

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The authors conducted a study aimed to assess the awareness and attitude among dental students and residents at King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry (KAUFD) toward using dental magnification.

Methods

An e-questionnaire was formulated then sent to dental students and residents (n = 651). The questionnaire included questions that assessed both the awareness and attitude toward using dental magnification. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 22. The chi-square test was used to establish relationships between categorical variables.

Results

The response rate was 69.7 % (n = 454). Of those, 78.1 % did not use magnification during dental procedures. However, 81.8 % agreed that dental magnification could enhance the accuracy and quality of their dental work. Thus, 91.6 % thought it would be useful in endodontics and 46.3 % voted for surgery. Of the 21.9 % that used magnification, dental loupes were mostly used, 55.9 %. The majority (59.4 %) of the participants believed that using dental magnification should be introduced by faculty beginning in Year I of dental school.

Conclusions

Among our respondents, most of the undergraduate students did not use dental magnification nor attended courses in the use of dental magnifications. However, most of the students were aware of its significance in improving the accuracy and quality of their work.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carr GB, Murgel CA. The use of the operating microscope in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54:191–214.CrossRefPubMed Carr GB, Murgel CA. The use of the operating microscope in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54:191–214.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Malterud MI. Magnification: you can’t effectively practice minimally invasive biomimetic dentistry without it. Gen Dent. 2013;61:14–7.PubMed Malterud MI. Magnification: you can’t effectively practice minimally invasive biomimetic dentistry without it. Gen Dent. 2013;61:14–7.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Leknius C, Geissberger M. The effect of magnification on the performance of fixed prosthodontic procedures. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1995;23:66–70.PubMed Leknius C, Geissberger M. The effect of magnification on the performance of fixed prosthodontic procedures. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1995;23:66–70.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S, Lodi G, Banfi G, Weinstein RL. Magnification devices for endodontic therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;9:CD005969. Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S, Lodi G, Banfi G, Weinstein RL. Magnification devices for endodontic therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;9:CD005969.
6.
go back to reference Christensen GJ. Magnification in dentistry: useful tool or another gimmick? J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134:1647–50.CrossRefPubMed Christensen GJ. Magnification in dentistry: useful tool or another gimmick? J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134:1647–50.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mallikarjun S, Devi P, Naik A, Tiwari S. Magnification in dental practice: How useful is it? J Health Res Rev. 2015;2:39.CrossRef Mallikarjun S, Devi P, Naik A, Tiwari S. Magnification in dental practice: How useful is it? J Health Res Rev. 2015;2:39.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Friedman MJ. Magnification in a restorative dental practice: from loupes to microscopes. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004;25:48. 53-45.PubMed Friedman MJ. Magnification in a restorative dental practice: from loupes to microscopes. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004;25:48. 53-45.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Maillet JP, Millar AM, Burke JM, Maillet MA, Maillet WA, Neish NR. Effect of magnification loupes on dental hygiene student posture. J Dent Educ. 2008;72:33–44.PubMed Maillet JP, Millar AM, Burke JM, Maillet MA, Maillet WA, Neish NR. Effect of magnification loupes on dental hygiene student posture. J Dent Educ. 2008;72:33–44.PubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference AAE Special Committee to Develop a Microscope Position Paper. AAE position statement. Use of microscopes and other magnification techniques. J Endod. 2012;38:1153–5.CrossRef AAE Special Committee to Develop a Microscope Position Paper. AAE position statement. Use of microscopes and other magnification techniques. J Endod. 2012;38:1153–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, Wenckus CS. Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod. 2002;28:324–7.CrossRefPubMed Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, Wenckus CS. Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod. 2002;28:324–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tsesis I, Rosen E, Schwartz-Arad D, Fuss Z. Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modern technique. J Endod. 2006;32:412–6.CrossRefPubMed Tsesis I, Rosen E, Schwartz-Arad D, Fuss Z. Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modern technique. J Endod. 2006;32:412–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Forgie AH, Pine CM, Longbottom C, Pitts NB. The use of magnification in general dental practice in Scotland--a survey report. J Dent. 1999;27:497–502.CrossRefPubMed Forgie AH, Pine CM, Longbottom C, Pitts NB. The use of magnification in general dental practice in Scotland--a survey report. J Dent. 1999;27:497–502.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Farook SA, Stokes RJ, Davis AKJ, Sneddon K, Collyer J. Use of dental loupes among dental trainers and trainees in the UK. J Investig Clin Dent. 2013;4:120–3.CrossRefPubMed Farook SA, Stokes RJ, Davis AKJ, Sneddon K, Collyer J. Use of dental loupes among dental trainers and trainees in the UK. J Investig Clin Dent. 2013;4:120–3.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Maggio MP, Villegas H, Blatz MB. The effect of magnification loupes on the performance of preclinical dental students. Quintessence Int. 2011;42:45–55.PubMed Maggio MP, Villegas H, Blatz MB. The effect of magnification loupes on the performance of preclinical dental students. Quintessence Int. 2011;42:45–55.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Narula K, Kundabala M, Shetty N, Shenoy R. Evaluation of tooth preparations for Class II cavities using magnification loupes among dental interns and final year BDS students in preclinical laboratory. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18:284–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Narula K, Kundabala M, Shetty N, Shenoy R. Evaluation of tooth preparations for Class II cavities using magnification loupes among dental interns and final year BDS students in preclinical laboratory. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18:284–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Hayes MJ, Taylor JA, Smith DR. Introducing loupes to clinical practice: dental hygienists experiences and opinions. Int J Dent Hyg. 2015;14:226–30.CrossRefPubMed Hayes MJ, Taylor JA, Smith DR. Introducing loupes to clinical practice: dental hygienists experiences and opinions. Int J Dent Hyg. 2015;14:226–30.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A, Bringolf U. Influence of loupes and age on the near visual acuity of practicing dentists. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16:069802.CrossRef Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A, Bringolf U. Influence of loupes and age on the near visual acuity of practicing dentists. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16:069802.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Burton JF, Bridgman GF. Presbyopia and the dentist: the effect of age on clinical vision. Int Dent J. 1990;40:303–12.PubMed Burton JF, Bridgman GF. Presbyopia and the dentist: the effect of age on clinical vision. Int Dent J. 1990;40:303–12.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Perrin P, Eichenberger M, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A. Visual acuity and magnification devices in dentistry. Swiss Dent J. 2016;126:222–35.PubMed Perrin P, Eichenberger M, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A. Visual acuity and magnification devices in dentistry. Swiss Dent J. 2016;126:222–35.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Bramson J, Smith S, Romagnoli G. Evaluating dental office ergonomic risk factors and hazards. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:174–83.CrossRefPubMed Bramson J, Smith S, Romagnoli G. Evaluating dental office ergonomic risk factors and hazards. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:174–83.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gorter RC, Eijkman MA, Hoogstraten J. Burnout and health among Dutch dentists. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:261–7.CrossRefPubMed Gorter RC, Eijkman MA, Hoogstraten J. Burnout and health among Dutch dentists. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:261–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Sarkar P, Shigli A. Ergonomic in general dental practice. People’s J Sci Res. 2012;5:56–60. Sarkar P, Shigli A. Ergonomic in general dental practice. People’s J Sci Res. 2012;5:56–60.
25.
26.
go back to reference James T, Gilmour AS. Magnifying loupes in modern dental practice: an update. Dent Update. 2010;37:633–6.PubMed James T, Gilmour AS. Magnifying loupes in modern dental practice: an update. Dent Update. 2010;37:633–6.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Awareness and attitude toward using dental magnification among dental students and residents at King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry
Authors
Turki Y. Alhazzazi
Nouran A. Alzebiani
Samaher K. Alotaibi
Dania F. Bogari
Ghaida T. Bakalka
Loai W. Hazzazi
Ahmed M. Jan
Neville J. McDonald
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0254-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Oral Health 1/2017 Go to the issue