Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology 1/2016

01-01-2016

Automatic ROI construction for analyzing time–signal intensity curve in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast

Authors: Koya Fujimoto, Yasuyuki Ueda, Shohei Kudomi, Teppei Yonezawa, Yuki Fujimoto, Katsuhiko Ueda

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to construct a 3-dimensional (3D) region of interest (ROI) for analyzing the time–signal intensity curve (TIC) semi-automatically in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) imaging of the breast. DCE-MR breast imaging datasets were acquired by a 3.0-Tesla MR system with the use of a 3D fast gradient echo sequence. The essential idea in the new method was to analyze each pixel and to construct an ROI made up of pixels with similar TICs. First, an analyst selected a starting point in the contrast media-enhanced tumor. Second, we calculated Pearson’s correlation coefficients (CCs) between the TIC in the starting coordinate selected by the analyst and the TIC in the other coordinates. Third, ROI pixels were selected if their CC threshold satisfied a level of coefficient variation of the ROI determined by prior research performed in our institution. We made a retrospective review of patients who underwent breast DCE-MR examination for pre-operative diagnosis. To confirm the feasibility of the resulting 3D-ROI from TIC analysis, we compared Fischer’s score obtained from 3D-ROI by applying a new method to a score obtained from a manually selected 2-dimensional (2D) ROI which was used during routine clinical examination. The Fischer’s scores obtained from both the automatically selected 3D-ROI and the manually selected 2D-ROI showed almost equivalent results. Thus, we considered that the new method was comparable to the conventional method. Furthermore, the new method has the potential to be used for evaluation of the extent of tumors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220(1):13–30.CrossRefPubMed Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220(1):13–30.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.CrossRefPubMed Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Shiraishi A, Suzuki M, Nozu S. Diagnosis of breast cancer extent and enhancement patterns using 3D-dynamic MR imaging: correlation with intraductal component. Jpn J Radiol. 1999;59:122–30. Shiraishi A, Suzuki M, Nozu S. Diagnosis of breast cancer extent and enhancement patterns using 3D-dynamic MR imaging: correlation with intraductal component. Jpn J Radiol. 1999;59:122–30.
4.
go back to reference Tozaki M. Diagnosis of breast cancer extent using 3D-dynamic MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated examination. Jpn J Magn Reson Med. 2002;22:140–6. Tozaki M. Diagnosis of breast cancer extent using 3D-dynamic MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated examination. Jpn J Magn Reson Med. 2002;22:140–6.
5.
go back to reference Uchikoshi M, Ueda T, Nishiki S. Usefulness of 3D-VIBE method in breast dynamic MRI: imaging parameters and contrasting effects. Jpn J Radiol. 2003;59(6):759–64. Uchikoshi M, Ueda T, Nishiki S. Usefulness of 3D-VIBE method in breast dynamic MRI: imaging parameters and contrasting effects. Jpn J Radiol. 2003;59(6):759–64.
6.
go back to reference Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:35–43.CrossRefPubMed Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:35–43.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wedegartner U, Bick U, Worller K. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1645–50.CrossRefPubMed Wedegartner U, Bick U, Worller K. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1645–50.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MYJ. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging : features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:171–8.CrossRefPubMed Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MYJ. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging : features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:171–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A. Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:431–8.CrossRefPubMed Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A. Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:431–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lavini C, Pikaart BP, de Jonge MC, Schaap GR, Maas M. Region of interest and pixel-by-pixel analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters and time–intensity curve shapes: a comparison in chondroid tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;27(1):62–8.CrossRef Lavini C, Pikaart BP, de Jonge MC, Schaap GR, Maas M. Region of interest and pixel-by-pixel analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters and time–intensity curve shapes: a comparison in chondroid tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;27(1):62–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system. In: Reston VA, editor. BI-RADS. 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system. In: Reston VA, editor. BI-RADS. 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
13.
go back to reference Mussurakis S, Buckley JP, Carruthers WB. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol. 1996;69:1009–16.CrossRefPubMed Mussurakis S, Buckley JP, Carruthers WB. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol. 1996;69:1009–16.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Liney GP, Sreenivas M, Gibbs P, Garcia-Alvarez R, Turnbull LW. Breast lesion analysis of shape technique: semiautomated vs. manual morphological description. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23(4):493–8.CrossRefPubMed Liney GP, Sreenivas M, Gibbs P, Garcia-Alvarez R, Turnbull LW. Breast lesion analysis of shape technique: semiautomated vs. manual morphological description. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23(4):493–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Stoutjesdijk MJ, Veltman J, Huisman H. Automated analysis of contrast enhancement in breast MRI lesions using mean shift clustering for ROI selection. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:606–14.CrossRefPubMed Stoutjesdijk MJ, Veltman J, Huisman H. Automated analysis of contrast enhancement in breast MRI lesions using mean shift clustering for ROI selection. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:606–14.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Renz D, Bottcher J, Diekmann F. Detection and classification of contrast-enhancing masses by a fully automatic computer-assisted diagnosis system for breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35(5):1077–88.CrossRefPubMed Renz D, Bottcher J, Diekmann F. Detection and classification of contrast-enhancing masses by a fully automatic computer-assisted diagnosis system for breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35(5):1077–88.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Wang TC, Huang YH, Huang CS. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI using pharmacokinetic model and 3-D morphology analysis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;32(3):197–205.CrossRefPubMed Wang TC, Huang YH, Huang CS. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI using pharmacokinetic model and 3-D morphology analysis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;32(3):197–205.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Agliozzo S, De Luca M, Bracco C. Computer-aided diagnosis for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI of mass-like lesions using a multiparametric model combining a selection of morphological, kinetic, and spatiotemporal features. Med Phys. 2012;39(4):1704–15.CrossRefPubMed Agliozzo S, De Luca M, Bracco C. Computer-aided diagnosis for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI of mass-like lesions using a multiparametric model combining a selection of morphological, kinetic, and spatiotemporal features. Med Phys. 2012;39(4):1704–15.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology. 1999;212:876–84.CrossRefPubMed Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology. 1999;212:876–84.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lee VS, Lavelle MT, Rofsky NM. Hepatic MR imaging with a dynamic contrast-enhanced isotropic volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination: feasibility, reproducibility, and technical quality. Radiology. 2000;215:365–72.CrossRefPubMed Lee VS, Lavelle MT, Rofsky NM. Hepatic MR imaging with a dynamic contrast-enhanced isotropic volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination: feasibility, reproducibility, and technical quality. Radiology. 2000;215:365–72.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–8.CrossRefPubMed Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:223–32.CrossRefPubMed Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:223–32.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Li S, Markis A, Bresford M. Use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to predict survival in patients with primary breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiology. 2011;260(1):68–78.CrossRefPubMed Li S, Markis A, Bresford M. Use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to predict survival in patients with primary breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiology. 2011;260(1):68–78.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tsili A, Argyropoulou M, Astrakas L. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI for characterizing intratesticular mass lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(3):578–85.CrossRefPubMed Tsili A, Argyropoulou M, Astrakas L. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI for characterizing intratesticular mass lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(3):578–85.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Automatic ROI construction for analyzing time–signal intensity curve in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast
Authors
Koya Fujimoto
Yasuyuki Ueda
Shohei Kudomi
Teppei Yonezawa
Yuki Fujimoto
Katsuhiko Ueda
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-015-0329-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Radiological Physics and Technology 1/2016 Go to the issue