Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Sports Medicine 9/2016

01-09-2016 | Letter to the Editor

Author’s Reply to Sabour and Ghassemi “Submaximal Step Tests to Estimate Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Healthy Adults: Methodological Issues About Validity and Reliability”

Authors: Roger Eston, Hunter Bennett, Gaynor Parfitt, Kade Davison

Published in: Sports Medicine | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

We thank Siamak Sabour and Fariba Ghassemi [1] for their interest in our systematic review [2]. Their concerns revolve around two points: (a) clinical significance and (b) the distinction between validity and reliability of the step test. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sabour S, Ghassemi F. Submaximal step tests to estimate maximal oxygen uptake in healthy adults: methodological issues about validity and reliability. Sports Med. 2016. doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0586-x. Sabour S, Ghassemi F. Submaximal step tests to estimate maximal oxygen uptake in healthy adults: methodological issues about validity and reliability. Sports Med. 2016. doi:10.​1007/​s40279-016-0586-x.
2.
go back to reference Bennett H, Parfitt G, Davison K, et al. Validity of submaximal step tests to estimate maximal oxygen uptake in healthy adults: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2016;46:737–50.CrossRefPubMed Bennett H, Parfitt G, Davison K, et al. Validity of submaximal step tests to estimate maximal oxygen uptake in healthy adults: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2016;46:737–50.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Arcuri JF, Borghi-Silva A, Labadessa IG, et al. Validity and reliability of the 6-minute step test in healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study. Clin J Sports Med. 2016;26(1):69–75.CrossRef Arcuri JF, Borghi-Silva A, Labadessa IG, et al. Validity and reliability of the 6-minute step test in healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study. Clin J Sports Med. 2016;26(1):69–75.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Eston RG, Lamb KL, Parfitt CG, et al. The validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from a perceptually regulated graded exercise test. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;94:221–7.CrossRefPubMed Eston RG, Lamb KL, Parfitt CG, et al. The validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from a perceptually regulated graded exercise test. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;94:221–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Eston RG, Faulkner JA, Parfitt CG, et al. The validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from a perceptually regulated graded exercise tests of different durations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;97:535–41.CrossRefPubMed Eston RG, Faulkner JA, Parfitt CG, et al. The validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from a perceptually regulated graded exercise tests of different durations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;97:535–41.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Eston R, Evans H, Faulkner J, et al. A perceptually-regulated, graded exercise test predicts peak oxygen uptake during treadmill exercise in active and sedentary participants. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:3459–68.CrossRefPubMed Eston R, Evans H, Faulkner J, et al. A perceptually-regulated, graded exercise test predicts peak oxygen uptake during treadmill exercise in active and sedentary participants. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:3459–68.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bennett H, Parfitt G, Davison K, et al. Validity of a two-step test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness: a perceptually-regulated protocol in healthy adults. Exercise Sports Science Australia, Research to Practice, Melbourne, April 2016 (paper under review by Eur J Appl Physiol). Bennett H, Parfitt G, Davison K, et al. Validity of a two-step test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness: a perceptually-regulated protocol in healthy adults. Exercise Sports Science Australia, Research to Practice, Melbourne, April 2016 (paper under review by Eur J Appl Physiol).
9.
go back to reference Buckley J, Sim J, Eston R, et al. Reliability and validity of measures taken during the Chester step test to predict aerobic power and to prescribe aerobic exercise. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(2):197–205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Buckley J, Sim J, Eston R, et al. Reliability and validity of measures taken during the Chester step test to predict aerobic power and to prescribe aerobic exercise. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(2):197–205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Sykes K, Roberts A. The Chester step test—a simple yet effective tool for aerobic capacity. Physiotherapy. 2004;90(1):183–8.CrossRef Sykes K, Roberts A. The Chester step test—a simple yet effective tool for aerobic capacity. Physiotherapy. 2004;90(1):183–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Author’s Reply to Sabour and Ghassemi “Submaximal Step Tests to Estimate Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Healthy Adults: Methodological Issues About Validity and Reliability”
Authors
Roger Eston
Hunter Bennett
Gaynor Parfitt
Kade Davison
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Sports Medicine / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0603-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

Sports Medicine 9/2016 Go to the issue