Skip to main content
Top
Literature
2.
go back to reference de Sanctis U, Missolungi A, Mutani B et al (2007) Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 144:712–718. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.07.021 CrossRefPubMed de Sanctis U, Missolungi A, Mutani B et al (2007) Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in keratoconus using the rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 144:712–718. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajo.​2007.​07.​021 CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wu W, Wang Y, Xu L (2014) Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252:91–99. doi:10.1007/s00417-013-2502-5 CrossRefPubMed Wu W, Wang Y, Xu L (2014) Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252:91–99. doi:10.​1007/​s00417-013-2502-5 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Author reply: central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema
Authors
D. Kuerten
N. Plange
P. Walter
M. Fuest
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3635-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 6/2017 Go to the issue