Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurological Sciences 12/2014

01-12-2014 | Brief Communication

Attitude of epilepsy patients and their attendants for participating in research on status epilepticus

Authors: Usha Kant Misra, Gourav Goyal, Abhijeet Kumar Kohat, Ajit Kumar, Jayantee Kalita

Published in: Neurological Sciences | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate the reason joining in status epilepticus (SE) trial by epilepsy patients and attendants and their preferences for types of trials and consent. The participants were interviewed after giving a SE case summary. Their demographic details, reason of consenting or non-consenting and preference of trials and type of consent were noted. The responses of the patients and attendants were compared. 77 subjects participated and 47 (61 %) were willing to participate in the trial mainly due to self-interest (treatment by specialist, best treatment and treatment availability only by trial). The reasons for unwilling were apprehension and lack of will. The participants preferred a head-to-head trial over a placebo-controlled (21 vs. 3), proxy consent rather than waived consent (16 vs. 6) and preconsent (16 vs. 3). These responses were not different between patients and attendants. 61 % subjects were willing to participate in SE trial especially in head-to-head trial with proxy consent.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Cassileth BR, Lusk EJ, Miller DS, Hurwitz S (1982) Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients and the public. JAMA 248:968–970PubMedCrossRef Cassileth BR, Lusk EJ, Miller DS, Hurwitz S (1982) Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients and the public. JAMA 248:968–970PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Emanuel EJ, Patterson WB (1998) Ethics of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 16:365–371PubMed Emanuel EJ, Patterson WB (1998) Ethics of randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 16:365–371PubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Freedman B, Weijer C, Glass KC (1996) Placebo orthodoxy in clinical research. I: empirical and methodological myths. J Law Med Ethics 24:243–251PubMedCrossRef Freedman B, Weijer C, Glass KC (1996) Placebo orthodoxy in clinical research. I: empirical and methodological myths. J Law Med Ethics 24:243–251PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Attitude of epilepsy patients and their attendants for participating in research on status epilepticus
Authors
Usha Kant Misra
Gourav Goyal
Abhijeet Kumar Kohat
Ajit Kumar
Jayantee Kalita
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Neurological Sciences / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Electronic ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1933-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Neurological Sciences 12/2014 Go to the issue