Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2020

01-11-2020 | Atrial Fibrillation | Original Research

Severe and uniform bi-atrial remodeling measured by dominant frequency analysis in persistent atrial fibrillation unresponsive to ablation

Authors: Adrian Luca, Anthony Pittet, Andréa Buttu, Anna McCann, Jean-Marc Vesin, Patrizio Pascale, Mathieu Le Bloa, Claudia Herrera, Chan-Il Park, Anne Rollin, Philippe Maury, Laurent Roten, Michael Kühne, Florian Spies, Sven Knecht, Christian Sticherling, Etienne Pruvot

Published in: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

High values of ECG and intracardiac dominant frequency (DF) are indicative of significant atrial remodeling in persistent atrial fibrillation (peAF). We hypothesized that patients with peAF unresponsive to ablation display higher ECG and intracardiac DFs than those remaining in sinus rhythm (SR) on the long term.

Methods

Forty consecutive patients underwent stepwise ablation for peAF (sustained duration 19 ± 11 months). Electrograms were recorded before ablation at 13 left atrium (LA) sites and at the right atrial appendage (RAA) and coronary sinus (CS) synchronously to the ECG. DF was defined as the highest peak within the power spectrum.

Results

peAF was terminated within the LA in 28 patients (left-terminated [LT]), whereas 12 patients remaining in AF after ablation (not left-terminated [NLT]) were cardioverted. Over a mean follow-up of 34 ± 14 months, all 12 NLT patients had a recurrence. Of the LT patients, 71% had a recurrence (20/28, LT_Rec), while 29% remained in SR throughout the follow-up (8/28, LT_SR). DF values and correlations between pairs of LA appendage (LAA), RAA, and CS DFs showed distinctive patterns among the subgroups. The NLT subgroup displayed the highest ECG and intracardiac DFs, with strong intragroup homogeneity between pairs of CS and LAA DFs, and to a lesser extent between pairs of CS and RAA DFs. Conversely, the LT_SR subgroup showed the lowest DFs, with significant intragroup heterogeneity between pairs of CS and both LAA and RAA DFs.

Conclusions

Patients with peAF unresponsive to ablation show high surface and intracardiac DFs indicative of severe and uniform bi-atrial remodeling.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
6.
go back to reference Uetake S, Miyauchi Y, Osaka M, Hayashi M, Iwasaki Y, Yodogawa K, et al. Frequency analysis of surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: correlation with the intracardiac ECGs and implications for radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Arrhythmia. 2014;30:453–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joa.2013.12.003.CrossRef Uetake S, Miyauchi Y, Osaka M, Hayashi M, Iwasaki Y, Yodogawa K, et al. Frequency analysis of surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: correlation with the intracardiac ECGs and implications for radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Arrhythmia. 2014;30:453–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​joa.​2013.​12.​003.CrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Atienza F, Almendral J, Ormaetxe JM, Moya Á, Martínez-Alday JD, Hernández-Madrid A, et al. Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation of drivers and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation: a noninferiority randomized multicenter RADAR-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2455–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.053.CrossRef Atienza F, Almendral J, Ormaetxe JM, Moya Á, Martínez-Alday JD, Hernández-Madrid A, et al. Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation of drivers and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation: a noninferiority randomized multicenter RADAR-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2455–67. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2014.​09.​053.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Verma A, Lakkireddy D, Wulffhart Z, Pillarisetti J, Farina D, Beardsall M, et al. Relationship between complex fractionated electrograms (CFE) and dominant frequency (DF) sites and prospective assessment of adding DF-guided ablation to pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22:1309–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02128.x.CrossRef Verma A, Lakkireddy D, Wulffhart Z, Pillarisetti J, Farina D, Beardsall M, et al. Relationship between complex fractionated electrograms (CFE) and dominant frequency (DF) sites and prospective assessment of adding DF-guided ablation to pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22:1309–16. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​j.​1540-8167.​2011.​02128.​x.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chauvin M, Shah DC, Haïssaguerre M, Marcellin L, Brechenmacher C. The anatomic basis of connections between the coronary sinus musculature and the left atrium in humans. Circulation. 2000;101:647–52. Chauvin M, Shah DC, Haïssaguerre M, Marcellin L, Brechenmacher C. The anatomic basis of connections between the coronary sinus musculature and the left atrium in humans. Circulation. 2000;101:647–52.
29.
go back to reference Oral H, Ozaydin M, Chugh A, Scharf C, Tada H, Hall B, et al. Role of the coronary sinus in maintenance of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14:1329–36. Oral H, Ozaydin M, Chugh A, Scharf C, Tada H, Hall B, et al. Role of the coronary sinus in maintenance of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14:1329–36.
30.
Metadata
Title
Severe and uniform bi-atrial remodeling measured by dominant frequency analysis in persistent atrial fibrillation unresponsive to ablation
Authors
Adrian Luca
Anthony Pittet
Andréa Buttu
Anna McCann
Jean-Marc Vesin
Patrizio Pascale
Mathieu Le Bloa
Claudia Herrera
Chan-Il Park
Anne Rollin
Philippe Maury
Laurent Roten
Michael Kühne
Florian Spies
Sven Knecht
Christian Sticherling
Etienne Pruvot
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1383-875X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8595
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00681-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2/2020 Go to the issue