Published in:
01-04-2015 | Original
Asynchronies during mechanical ventilation are associated with mortality
Authors:
Lluís Blanch, Ana Villagra, Bernat Sales, Jaume Montanya, Umberto Lucangelo, Manel Luján, Oscar García-Esquirol, Encarna Chacón, Anna Estruga, Joan C. Oliva, Alberto Hernández-Abadia, Guillermo M. Albaiceta, Enrique Fernández-Mondejar, Rafael Fernández, Josefina Lopez-Aguilar, Jesús Villar, Gastón Murias, Robert M. Kacmarek
Published in:
Intensive Care Medicine
|
Issue 4/2015
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to assess the prevalence and time course of asynchronies during mechanical ventilation (MV).
Methods
Prospective, noninterventional observational study of 50 patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) beds equipped with Better Care™ software throughout MV. The software distinguished ventilatory modes and detected ineffective inspiratory efforts during expiration (IEE), double-triggering, aborted inspirations, and short and prolonged cycling to compute the asynchrony index (AI) for each hour. We analyzed 7,027 h of MV comprising 8,731,981 breaths.
Results
Asynchronies were detected in all patients and in all ventilator modes. The median AI was 3.41 % [IQR 1.95–5.77]; the most common asynchrony overall and in each mode was IEE [2.38 % (IQR 1.36–3.61)]. Asynchronies were less frequent from 12 pm to 6 am [1.69 % (IQR 0.47–4.78)]. In the hours where more than 90 % of breaths were machine-triggered, the median AI decreased, but asynchronies were still present. When we compared patients with AI > 10 vs AI ≤ 10 %, we found similar reintubation and tracheostomy rates but higher ICU and hospital mortality and a trend toward longer duration of MV in patients with an AI above the cutoff.
Conclusions
Asynchronies are common throughout MV, occurring in all MV modes, and more frequently during the daytime. Further studies should determine whether asynchronies are a marker for or a cause of mortality.