Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2017

Open Access 01-03-2017 | Otology

Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores

Authors: J. Löhler, B. Wollenberg, P. Schlattmann, N. Hoang, R. Schönweiler

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire reports subjective hearing impairments in four typical conditions. We investigated the association between the frequency-specific probability of hearing loss and scores from the unaided APHAB (APHABu) to determine whether the APHABu could be useful in primary diagnoses of hearing loss, in addition to pure tone and speech audiometry. This retrospective study included database records from 6558 patients (average age 69.0 years). We employed a multivariate generalised linear mixed model to analyse the probabilities of hearing losses (severity range 20–75 dB, evaluated in 5-dB steps), measured at different frequencies (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 kHz), for nearly all combinations of APHABu subscale scores (subscale scores from 20 to 80%, evaluated in steps of 5%). We calculated the probability of hearing loss for 28,561 different combinations of APHABu subscale scores (results available online). In general, the probability of hearing loss was positively associated with the combined APHABu score (i.e. increasing probability with increasing scores). However, this association was negative at one frequency (8 kHz). The highest probabilities were for a hearing loss of 45 dB at test frequency 2.0 kHz, but with a wide spreading. We showed that the APHABu subscale scores were associated with the probability of hearing loss measured with audiometry. This information could enrich the expert’s evaluation of the subject’s hearing loss, and it might help resolve suspicious cases of aggravation. The 0.5 and 8.0 kHz frequencies influenced hearing loss less than the frequencies in-between, and 2.0 kHz was most influential on intermediate degree hearing loss (around 45 dB), which corresponded to the frequency-dependence of speech intelligibility measured with speech audiometry.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Johnson JA, Cox RM, Alexander GC (2010) Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms. Ear Hear 31:47–55CrossRefPubMed Johnson JA, Cox RM, Alexander GC (2010) Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms. Ear Hear 31:47–55CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Löhler J, Frohburg R, Moser L (2010) The use of the German APHAB for quality control in hearing aid fitting in an ENT-office. Comparison of our results with the given US-norm. Laryngo Rhino Otol 89:737–744CrossRef Löhler J, Frohburg R, Moser L (2010) The use of the German APHAB for quality control in hearing aid fitting in an ENT-office. Comparison of our results with the given US-norm. Laryngo Rhino Otol 89:737–744CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Löhler J, Moser L, Heinrich D, Hörmann K, Walther LE (2012) Results of clinical use of the German version of the APHAB. HNO 60:626–636CrossRefPubMed Löhler J, Moser L, Heinrich D, Hörmann K, Walther LE (2012) Results of clinical use of the German version of the APHAB. HNO 60:626–636CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Löhler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B, Schönweiler R (2014) Implementation of the new quality assurance agreement for the fitting of hearing aids in daily practice. Part 1: new regulations pertaining to hearing aid fitting. HNO 62:605–612CrossRefPubMed Löhler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B, Schönweiler R (2014) Implementation of the new quality assurance agreement for the fitting of hearing aids in daily practice. Part 1: new regulations pertaining to hearing aid fitting. HNO 62:605–612CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Löhler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B, Schönweiler R (2014) Implementation of the new quality assurance agreement for the fitting of hearing aids in daily practice. Part 2: new diagnostic aspects of speech audiometry. HNO 62:667–682CrossRefPubMed Löhler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B, Schönweiler R (2014) Implementation of the new quality assurance agreement for the fitting of hearing aids in daily practice. Part 2: new diagnostic aspects of speech audiometry. HNO 62:667–682CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Löhler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B, Kappe T, Schlattmann P, Schlattmann P, Schönweiler R (2016) The influence of hearing loss represented by standard audiogram types to unaided APHAB scores. Laryngo Rhino Otol 95:540–545CrossRef Löhler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B, Kappe T, Schlattmann P, Schlattmann P, Schönweiler R (2016) The influence of hearing loss represented by standard audiogram types to unaided APHAB scores. Laryngo Rhino Otol 95:540–545CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Löhler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B, Kappe T, Schönweiler R (2016) The influence of frequency-dependent hearing loss to unaided APHAB scores. Eur Arch Oto Rhin Laryngol. doi:10.1007/s00405-016-3966-9 Löhler J, Akcicek B, Wollenberg B, Kappe T, Schönweiler R (2016) The influence of frequency-dependent hearing loss to unaided APHAB scores. Eur Arch Oto Rhin Laryngol. doi:10.​1007/​s00405-016-3966-9
9.
go back to reference Löhler J, Akcicek B, Kappe T, Schlattmann P, Wollenberg B, Schönweiler R (2014) Development and use of an APHAB database. HNO 62:735–745CrossRefPubMed Löhler J, Akcicek B, Kappe T, Schlattmann P, Wollenberg B, Schönweiler R (2014) Development and use of an APHAB database. HNO 62:735–745CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fahrmeir L, Tutz G (2001) Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalised linear models. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef Fahrmeir L, Tutz G (2001) Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalised linear models. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ventry IM, Weinstein BE (1982) The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear 3:128–134CrossRefPubMed Ventry IM, Weinstein BE (1982) The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear 3:128–134CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Löhler J, Schlattmann P, Walther LE (2013) The Mini-Audio-Test (MAT). Screening inventory for hearing loss starting at the age of 50. Oto Rhino Laryngol 92:815–822CrossRef Löhler J, Schlattmann P, Walther LE (2013) The Mini-Audio-Test (MAT). Screening inventory for hearing loss starting at the age of 50. Oto Rhino Laryngol 92:815–822CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hornsby BWY, Ricketss TA (2006) The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 119:1752–1763CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hornsby BWY, Ricketss TA (2006) The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 119:1752–1763CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores
Authors
J. Löhler
B. Wollenberg
P. Schlattmann
N. Hoang
R. Schönweiler
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2017 Go to the issue