Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 3/2024

Open Access 20-01-2024 | Assisted Reproduction | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

The risk of perinatal and cardiometabolic complications in pregnancies conceived by medically assisted reproduction

Authors: Dovile Vilda, Elizabeth F. Sutton, Venkata Sai Sahithi Kothamasu, Paul R. Clisham, Cecilia T. Gambala, Emily W. Harville

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the impact of medically assisted fertility treatments on the risk of developing perinatal and cardiometabolic complications during pregnancy and in-hospital deliveries.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using medical health records of deliveries occurring in 2016–2022 at a women’s specialty hospital in a southern state of the Unites States (US). Pregnancies achieved using medically assisted reproductive (MAR) techniques were compared with unassisted pregnancies using propensity score matching (PSM), based on demographic, preexisting health, and reproductive factors. Study outcomes included cesarean delivery, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), delivery complications, and postpartum readmission. We used Poisson regression with robust standard errors to generate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all study outcomes.

Results

Among 57,354 deliveries, 586 (1.02%) pregnancies were achieved using MAR and 56,768 (98.98%) were unassisted (“non-MAR”). Compared to the non-MAR group, MAR pregnancies had significantly higher prevalence of all study outcomes, including GDM (15.9% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.001), HDP (28.2% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001), cesarean delivery (56.1% vs. 34.6%, p < 0.001), delivery complications (10.9% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.03), and postpartum readmission (4.3% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.02). In a PSM sample of 584 MAR and 1,727 unassisted pregnancies, MAR was associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.01–1.22); whereas IVF was associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03–1.28) and delivery complications (RR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.04–2.01).

Conclusions

Women who conceived with MAR were at increased risk of cesarean deliveries, and those who conceived with IVF were additionally at risk of delivery complications.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Luke B. Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):270–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luke B. Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):270–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Wu P, et al. In-hospital complications in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology. J Am Heart Association. 2022;11(5):e022658.CrossRef Wu P, et al. In-hospital complications in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology. J Am Heart Association. 2022;11(5):e022658.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cedars MI, et al. The sixth vital sign: what reproduction tells us about overall health. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;20172:phox008. Proceedings from a NICHD/CDC workshop. Cedars MI, et al. The sixth vital sign: what reproduction tells us about overall health. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;20172:phox008. Proceedings from a NICHD/CDC workshop.
4.
go back to reference Smith J, Velez MP, Dayan N. Infertility, infertility treatment, and Cardiovascular Disease: an overview. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37(12):1959–68.CrossRefPubMed Smith J, Velez MP, Dayan N. Infertility, infertility treatment, and Cardiovascular Disease: an overview. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37(12):1959–68.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Stern JE, et al. Assisted reproductive technology or infertility: what underlies adverse outcomes? Lessons from the Massachusetts Outcome study of assisted Reproductive Technology. F&S Reviews; 2022. Stern JE, et al. Assisted reproductive technology or infertility: what underlies adverse outcomes? Lessons from the Massachusetts Outcome study of assisted Reproductive Technology. F&S Reviews; 2022.
6.
7.
go back to reference Jackson RA, et al. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(3):551–63.CrossRefPubMed Jackson RA, et al. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(3):551–63.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Qin J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73–85. e6.CrossRefPubMed Qin J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73–85. e6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Helmerhorst FM, et al. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2004;328(7434):261.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Helmerhorst FM, et al. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2004;328(7434):261.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Luke B, et al. Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts outcomes study of assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):327. e1-327. e14.PubMedCentral Luke B, et al. Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts outcomes study of assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):327. e1-327. e14.PubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Qin J, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes Associated with in Vitro Fertilization in Singleton pregnancies. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(4):595–608.CrossRefPubMed Qin J, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes Associated with in Vitro Fertilization in Singleton pregnancies. Reprod Sci. 2017;24(4):595–608.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Qin JB, et al. Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection among multiple births: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on cohort studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(3):577–97.CrossRefPubMed Qin JB, et al. Worldwide prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection among multiple births: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on cohort studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(3):577–97.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Mulder C, et al. Cardio-metabolic risk factors among young infertile women: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020;127(8):930–9.CrossRef Mulder C, et al. Cardio-metabolic risk factors among young infertile women: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020;127(8):930–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Guan C, et al. Assisted reproductive technology: what are the cardiovascular risks for women? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2023;21(10):663–73.CrossRefPubMed Guan C, et al. Assisted reproductive technology: what are the cardiovascular risks for women? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2023;21(10):663–73.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dayan N, et al. Cardiovascular Risk following fertility therapy: systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(10):1203–13.CrossRefPubMed Dayan N, et al. Cardiovascular Risk following fertility therapy: systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(10):1203–13.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Monseur BC, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and infertility treatment: a population-based survey among United States women. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(7):1449–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Monseur BC, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and infertility treatment: a population-based survey among United States women. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(7):1449–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
19.
go back to reference Chih HJ, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):449.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chih HJ, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):449.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
21.
go back to reference Zahid S, et al. Cardiovascular complications during Delivery admissions Associated with assisted Reproductive Technology (from a National Inpatient Sample Analysis 2008 to 2019). Am J Cardiol. 2023;186:126–34.CrossRefPubMed Zahid S, et al. Cardiovascular complications during Delivery admissions Associated with assisted Reproductive Technology (from a National Inpatient Sample Analysis 2008 to 2019). Am J Cardiol. 2023;186:126–34.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Austin PC. An introduction to Propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in Observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.CrossRef Austin PC. An introduction to Propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in Observational studies. Multivar Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lodge-Tulloch NA, et al. Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:1–13.CrossRef Lodge-Tulloch NA, et al. Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:1–13.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ensing S, et al. Risk of poor neonatal outcome at term after medically assisted reproduction: a propensity score-matched study. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):384–90. e1.CrossRefPubMed Ensing S, et al. Risk of poor neonatal outcome at term after medically assisted reproduction: a propensity score-matched study. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):384–90. e1.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Richmond E, et al. Caesarean birth in women with infertility: population-based cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2022;129(6):908–16.CrossRef Richmond E, et al. Caesarean birth in women with infertility: population-based cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2022;129(6):908–16.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kong F, et al. Placental abnormalities and placenta-related complications following In-Vitro fertilization: based on National Hospitalized Data in China. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:924070.CrossRef Kong F, et al. Placental abnormalities and placenta-related complications following In-Vitro fertilization: based on National Hospitalized Data in China. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:924070.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kawwass JF, Badell ML. Maternal and fetal risk associated with assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):763–72.CrossRefPubMed Kawwass JF, Badell ML. Maternal and fetal risk associated with assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):763–72.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Tang D, et al. The use of IVF/ICSI and risk of postpartum hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study of 153,765 women in China. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1016457.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tang D, et al. The use of IVF/ICSI and risk of postpartum hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study of 153,765 women in China. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1016457.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Magnus MC, et al. Maternal risk of Cardiovascular Disease after Use of assisted Reproductive technologies. JAMA cardiology; 2023. Magnus MC, et al. Maternal risk of Cardiovascular Disease after Use of assisted Reproductive technologies. JAMA cardiology; 2023.
Metadata
Title
The risk of perinatal and cardiometabolic complications in pregnancies conceived by medically assisted reproduction
Authors
Dovile Vilda
Elizabeth F. Sutton
Venkata Sai Sahithi Kothamasu
Paul R. Clisham
Cecilia T. Gambala
Emily W. Harville
Publication date
20-01-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03025-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 3/2024 Go to the issue