Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 5/2008

01-05-2008 | Conference Paper

Assessment of the Risk of Fragrance Allergy in the General Population

Challenges and Methodological Issues

Author: Dr Luigi Naldi

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

There are still unanswered questions about the safety of fragrances. In this conference paper, fragrance allergy will be considered in the context of a wider discussion concerning the prevalence and causes of contact dermatitis.
No criteria for a reliable diagnosis of ‘contact dermatitis’ are available. International recommendations and standardization for the patch test method exist; however, the question of whether agents that are positive are causally linked to contact dermatitis remains fraught with uncertainties concerning false-positive rates and clinical relevance. Most of the discussion concerning prevalence or incidence variations of allergic contact dermatitis to fragrances concentrate on the frequency of positive patch tests in clinical series, i.e. ‘floating numerators’.
Risk assessment requires that data from different sources are integrated and compared. Therefore, both a ‘sentinel surveillance’ system and more refined epidemiological studies in well defined populations are needed to reliably assess risks associated with fragrance exposure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pauwels M, Rogiers V. Safety evaluation of cosmetics in the EU. Reality and challenges for the toxicologist. Toxicol Lett 2004; 151: 7–17PubMedCrossRef Pauwels M, Rogiers V. Safety evaluation of cosmetics in the EU. Reality and challenges for the toxicologist. Toxicol Lett 2004; 151: 7–17PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mortz CG, Andersen KE. Allergic contact dermatitis in children and adolescents. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 121–30PubMedCrossRef Mortz CG, Andersen KE. Allergic contact dermatitis in children and adolescents. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 121–30PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Naldi L. The epidemiology of fragrance allergy: questions and needs. Dermatology 2002; 205: 89–97PubMedCrossRef Naldi L. The epidemiology of fragrance allergy: questions and needs. Dermatology 2002; 205: 89–97PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menne T, et al. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population: prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57: 287–99PubMedCrossRef Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menne T, et al. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population: prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57: 287–99PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol 2002; 82: 352–8PubMedCrossRef Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol 2002; 82: 352–8PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Diepgen TL, Weisshaar E. Contact dermatitis: epidemiology and frequent sensitizers to cosmetics. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007; 21 Suppl. 2: 9–13PubMedCrossRef Diepgen TL, Weisshaar E. Contact dermatitis: epidemiology and frequent sensitizers to cosmetics. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007; 21 Suppl. 2: 9–13PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Timothy B, Graham C. Postmarketing surveillance and adverse drug reactions: current perspectives and future trends. JAMA 1999; 281: 824–9CrossRef Timothy B, Graham C. Postmarketing surveillance and adverse drug reactions: current perspectives and future trends. JAMA 1999; 281: 824–9CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, et al. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: the information network of departments of dermatology (IVDK) in Germany. Eur J Dermatol 1998; 8: 36–40PubMed Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, et al. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: the information network of departments of dermatology (IVDK) in Germany. Eur J Dermatol 1998; 8: 36–40PubMed
9.
go back to reference Tubert P, Bégaud B, Haramburu F, et al. Spontaneous reporting: how many cases are required to trigger a warning? Br J Clin Pharmacol 1991; 32: 407–8PubMedCrossRef Tubert P, Bégaud B, Haramburu F, et al. Spontaneous reporting: how many cases are required to trigger a warning? Br J Clin Pharmacol 1991; 32: 407–8PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Heydorn S, Menné T, Johansen JD. Fragrance allergy and hand eczema: a review. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48: 59–66PubMedCrossRef Heydorn S, Menné T, Johansen JD. Fragrance allergy and hand eczema: a review. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48: 59–66PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of the Risk of Fragrance Allergy in the General Population
Challenges and Methodological Issues
Author
Dr Luigi Naldi
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200831050-00012

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

Drug Safety 5/2008 Go to the issue

Conference Paper

Cosmetovigilance

Conference Paper

Phytotherapic Compounds