Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 7/2017

Open Access 01-07-2017 | Original Communication

Assessment of the factorial validity and reliability of the ALSFRS-R: a revision of its measurement model

Authors: Leonhard A. Bakker, Carin D. Schröder, Michael A. van Es, Paul Westers, Johanna M. A. Visser-Meily, Leonard H. van den Berg

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) is a widely used primary outcome measure in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical practice and clinical trials. ALSFRS-R items cannot, however, validly be summed to obtain a total score, but constitute domain scores reflecting a profile of disease severity. Currently, there are different measurement models for estimating domain scores. The objective of the present study is, therefore, to derive the measurement model that best fits the data for a valid and uniform estimation of ALSFRS-R domain scores. Data from 1556 patients with ALS were obtained from a population-based register in The Netherlands. A random split of the sample provided a calibration and validation set. Measurement models of the ALSFRS-R were investigated using both exploratory factor analyses and confirmatory factor analyses. The measurement model with a four-factor structure (i.e., bulbar, fine motor, gross motor, and respiratory function), with correlated factors and cross-loading items on dressing and hygiene and turning in bed and adjusting bed clothes on both motor function scales, provided the best fit to the data in both sets. Correlation between factors ranged from weak to modest, confirming that the ALSFRS-R constitutes a profile of four clinically relevant domain scores rather than a total score that expresses disease severity. The internal consistency of the four domain scores was satisfactory. Our revision of the measurement model may allow for a more adequate estimation of disease severity and disease progression in epidemiological studies and clinical trials.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference The ALS CNTF treatment study (ACTS) phase I-II Study Group (1996) The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale. Assessment of activities of daily living in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol 53:141–147CrossRef The ALS CNTF treatment study (ACTS) phase I-II Study Group (1996) The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale. Assessment of activities of daily living in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol 53:141–147CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ohashi Y, Tashiro K, Itoyama Y et al (2001) Study of functional rating scale for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: revised ALSFRS (ALSFRS-R) Japanese version. No To Shinkei 53:346–355PubMed Ohashi Y, Tashiro K, Itoyama Y et al (2001) Study of functional rating scale for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: revised ALSFRS (ALSFRS-R) Japanese version. No To Shinkei 53:346–355PubMed
8.
go back to reference Koc F, Balal M, Demir T et al (2016) Adaptation to Turkish and reliability study of the revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R). Arch Neuropsychiatr 53:229–233. doi:10.5152/npa.2016.11334 CrossRef Koc F, Balal M, Demir T et al (2016) Adaptation to Turkish and reliability study of the revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R). Arch Neuropsychiatr 53:229–233. doi:10.​5152/​npa.​2016.​11334 CrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Kasarskis EJ, Dempsey-Hall L, Thompson MM et al (2005) Rating the severity of ALS by caregivers over the telephone using the ALSFRS-R. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Dis 6:50–54. doi:10.1080/14660820510027107 CrossRef Kasarskis EJ, Dempsey-Hall L, Thompson MM et al (2005) Rating the severity of ALS by caregivers over the telephone using the ALSFRS-R. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Dis 6:50–54. doi:10.​1080/​1466082051002710​7 CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Franchignoni F, Mora G, Giordano A et al (2013) Evidence of multidimensionality in the ALSFRS-R scale: a critical appraisal on its measurement properties using Rasch analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84:1340–1345. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-304701 CrossRefPubMed Franchignoni F, Mora G, Giordano A et al (2013) Evidence of multidimensionality in the ALSFRS-R scale: a critical appraisal on its measurement properties using Rasch analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84:1340–1345. doi:10.​1136/​jnnp-2012-304701 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Bacci ED, Staniewska D, Coyne KS et al (2016) Item response theory analysis of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised in the Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials Database. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration 17:157–167. doi:10.3109/21678421.2015.1095930 CrossRefPubMed Bacci ED, Staniewska D, Coyne KS et al (2016) Item response theory analysis of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised in the Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials Database. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration 17:157–167. doi:10.​3109/​21678421.​2015.​1095930 CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL (2009) El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders 1:293–299. doi:10.1080/146608200300079536 CrossRef Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL (2009) El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders 1:293–299. doi:10.​1080/​1466082003000795​36 CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard PÉ, Savalei V (2012) When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods 17:354–373. doi:10.1037/a0029315 CrossRefPubMed Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard PÉ, Savalei V (2012) When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods 17:354–373. doi:10.​1037/​a0029315 CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference RStudio Team (2014) RStudio: Integrated development for R RStudio Team (2014) RStudio: Integrated development for R
23.
go back to reference Muthén BO, Muthén LK, (2015) Mplus user’s guide Muthén BO, Muthén LK, (2015) Mplus user’s guide
24.
go back to reference Rooney J, Burke T, Vajda A, et al (2016) What does the ALSFRS-R really measure? A longitudinal and survival analysis of functional dimension subscores in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry jnnp–2016–314661. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2016-314661 Rooney J, Burke T, Vajda A, et al (2016) What does the ALSFRS-R really measure? A longitudinal and survival analysis of functional dimension subscores in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry jnnp–2016–314661. doi:10.​1136/​jnnp-2016-314661
Metadata
Title
Assessment of the factorial validity and reliability of the ALSFRS-R: a revision of its measurement model
Authors
Leonhard A. Bakker
Carin D. Schröder
Michael A. van Es
Paul Westers
Johanna M. A. Visser-Meily
Leonard H. van den Berg
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8538-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

Journal of Neurology 7/2017 Go to the issue