Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Research article

Assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen – experimental study

Authors: Maged S Habib, James A Lowell, Nick S Holliman, Andrew Hunter, Daniella Vaideanu, Anthony Hildreth, David HW Steel

Published in: BMC Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Stereoscopic assessment of the optic disc morphology is an important part of the care of patients with glaucoma. The aim of this study was to assess stereoviewing of stereoscopic optic disc images using an example of the new technology of autostereoscopic screens compared to the liquid shutter goggles.

Methods

Independent assessment of glaucomatous disc characteristics and measurement of optic disc and cup parameters whilst using either an autostereoscopic screen or liquid crystal shutter goggles synchronized with a view switching display. The main outcome measures were inter-modality agreements between the two used modalities as evaluated by the weighted kappa test and Bland Altman plots.

Results

Inter-modality agreement for measuring optic disc parameters was good [Average kappa coefficient for vertical Cup/Disc ratio was 0.78 (95% CI 0.62–0.91) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.6–0.92) for observer 1 and 2 respectively]. Agreement between modalities for assessing optic disc characteristics for glaucoma on a five-point scale was very good with a kappa value of 0.97.

Conclusion

This study compared two different methods of stereo viewing. The results of assessment of the different optic disc and cup parameters were comparable using an example of the newly developing autostereoscopic display technologies as compared to the shutter goggles system used. The Inter-modality agreement was high. This new technology carries potential clinical usability benefits in different areas of ophthalmic practice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parkin B, Shuttleworth G, Costen M, Davison C: A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001, 85: 1347-1351. 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Parkin B, Shuttleworth G, Costen M, Davison C: A comparison of stereoscopic and monoscopic evaluation of optic disc topography using a digital optic disc stereo camera. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001, 85: 1347-1351. 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Lipton L, Ackerman M: Liquid crystal shutter system for stereoscopic and other applications. United States patent. Patent Number. 1990, 4967268- Lipton L, Ackerman M: Liquid crystal shutter system for stereoscopic and other applications. United States patent. Patent Number. 1990, 4967268-
3.
go back to reference Lipscomb J, Wooten W: Reducing crosstalk between stereoscopic views. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems (Proceedings of S P I E). 1994, 2177: 92-96.CrossRef Lipscomb J, Wooten W: Reducing crosstalk between stereoscopic views. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems (Proceedings of S P I E). 1994, 2177: 92-96.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Eichenlaub JB: Further advances in autostereoscopic technology at DimensionTechnologies Inc. Stereoscopic displays and applications III (Proceedings of S P I E). 1992, 1669: 163-175.CrossRef Eichenlaub JB: Further advances in autostereoscopic technology at DimensionTechnologies Inc. Stereoscopic displays and applications III (Proceedings of S P I E). 1992, 1669: 163-175.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Holliman NS: Three dimensional display systems. Handbook of Optoelectronics. Edited by: Dakin JP, Brown RGW. 2006, Taylor and Francis Holliman NS: Three dimensional display systems. Handbook of Optoelectronics. Edited by: Dakin JP, Brown RGW. 2006, Taylor and Francis
6.
go back to reference Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, Nakla M, Coleman AL, Caprioli J: Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002, 43 (1): 140-145.PubMed Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, Nakla M, Coleman AL, Caprioli J: Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002, 43 (1): 140-145.PubMed
7.
go back to reference DeLeon-Ortega JE, Arthur SN, McGwin G, Xie A, Monheit BE, Girkin CA: Discrimination between glaucomatous and non glaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006, 47 (8): 3374-3380. 10.1167/iovs.05-1239.CrossRefPubMed DeLeon-Ortega JE, Arthur SN, McGwin G, Xie A, Monheit BE, Girkin CA: Discrimination between glaucomatous and non glaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006, 47 (8): 3374-3380. 10.1167/iovs.05-1239.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33: 159-174. 10.2307/2529310.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33: 159-174. 10.2307/2529310.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hrynchak P, Hutchings N, Jones D, Simpson T: A comparison of cup-to-disc ratio evaluation in normal subjects using stereo biomicroscopy and digital imaging of the optic nerve head. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2003, 23: 51-59. 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00088.x.CrossRef Hrynchak P, Hutchings N, Jones D, Simpson T: A comparison of cup-to-disc ratio evaluation in normal subjects using stereo biomicroscopy and digital imaging of the optic nerve head. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2003, 23: 51-59. 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00088.x.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP: Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119: 1492-1499.CrossRefPubMed Chauhan BC, McCormick TA, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP: Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119: 1492-1499.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Quigley HA, Addicks EM: Quantitative studies of retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982, 100: 807-814.CrossRefPubMed Quigley HA, Addicks EM: Quantitative studies of retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982, 100: 807-814.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rumsey KE, Rumsey JM, Leach NE: Monocular versus stereoscopic measurement of cup to disc ratios. Optom Vis Sci. 1990, 67: 546-550. 10.1097/00006324-199007000-00013.CrossRefPubMed Rumsey KE, Rumsey JM, Leach NE: Monocular versus stereoscopic measurement of cup to disc ratios. Optom Vis Sci. 1990, 67: 546-550. 10.1097/00006324-199007000-00013.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU: Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1992, 99: 215-221.CrossRefPubMed Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU: Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1992, 99: 215-221.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hanson S, Krishnan SK, Philips J: Observer experience and cup: disc ratio assessment. Optom Vis Sci. 2001, 78: 701-705. 10.1097/00006324-200110000-00009.CrossRefPubMed Hanson S, Krishnan SK, Philips J: Observer experience and cup: disc ratio assessment. Optom Vis Sci. 2001, 78: 701-705. 10.1097/00006324-200110000-00009.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Morgan JE, Sheen NJL, North RV, Choong Y, Ansari E: Digital imaging of the optic nerve head: monoscopic and stereoscopic analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005, 89: 879-884. 10.1136/bjo.2004.046169.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morgan JE, Sheen NJL, North RV, Choong Y, Ansari E: Digital imaging of the optic nerve head: monoscopic and stereoscopic analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005, 89: 879-884. 10.1136/bjo.2004.046169.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Assessment of stereoscopic optic disc images using an autostereoscopic screen – experimental study
Authors
Maged S Habib
James A Lowell
Nick S Holliman
Andrew Hunter
Daniella Vaideanu
Anthony Hildreth
David HW Steel
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-8-13

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2008 Go to the issue