Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 6/2022

14-03-2022 | Reports of Original Investigations

Assessment of sensory block during labour epidural analgesia: a prospective cohort study to determine the influence of the direction of testing

Authors: Eliane Cristina de Souza Soares, MD, Mrinalini Balki, MD, Kristi Downey, MSc, Xiang Y. Ye, MSc, Jose Carlos A. Carvalho, MD, PhD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Assessment of sensory block level during labour epidural analgesia is an essential component of clinical practice and patient safety. Nevertheless, the methods and direction of testing are not standardized. In our hospital, sensory block testing to ice is routinely used, but while some anesthesiologists test the block from a nonanesthetized to an anesthetized area, some do it in the opposite direction. It is unknown how these two different practices affect identification of the sensory block level. The objective of this study was to determine the agreement between these two practices.

Methods

We enrolled 31 patients admitted to the labour and delivery unit in a prospective cohort study. At their request, labour epidural analgesia was performed as per institutional routine. Sensory block level to ice was assessed using opposite directions by two randomly assigned independent investigators, one and two hours after the loading dose was administered.

Results

Sensory block levels to ice assessed from an anesthetized area to a nonanesthetized area were lower than those when assessed with the stimulus applied in the opposite direction, typically one segment lower.

Discussion

Given the small difference detected with both methods, it may be acceptable to use either in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the lack of standardization may have a significant impact when comparing studies involving assessment of sensory block to ice.

Study registration

www.​ClinicalTrials.​gov (NCT03572439); registered 28 June 2018.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hoyle J, Yentis SM. Assessing the height of block for caesarean section over the past three decades: trends from the literature. Anesthesia 2015; 70: 421-8.CrossRef Hoyle J, Yentis SM. Assessing the height of block for caesarean section over the past three decades: trends from the literature. Anesthesia 2015; 70: 421-8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bourne TM, Campbell F, Mushambi MC, May AE. Patients' assessment of sensory levels during epidural analgesia in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 1997; 6: 239-41.CrossRef Bourne TM, Campbell F, Mushambi MC, May AE. Patients' assessment of sensory levels during epidural analgesia in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth 1997; 6: 239-41.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jones MJ, Bogod DG, Rees GA, Rosen M. Midwive's assessment of the upper sensory level after epidural blockade. Anesthesia 1988; 43: 557-9.CrossRef Jones MJ, Bogod DG, Rees GA, Rosen M. Midwive's assessment of the upper sensory level after epidural blockade. Anesthesia 1988; 43: 557-9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wolin JA, Carter TR, Baysinger CL, Han X, Shotwell M, Downing JW. A randomized, observer-blind comparison between the Neurotip mounted Neuropen and a disposable plastic neurological wheel for assessing the level of spinal blockade at cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2014; 23: 125-30.CrossRef Wolin JA, Carter TR, Baysinger CL, Han X, Shotwell M, Downing JW. A randomized, observer-blind comparison between the Neurotip mounted Neuropen and a disposable plastic neurological wheel for assessing the level of spinal blockade at cesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2014; 23: 125-30.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference White JL, Stevens RA, Kao TC. Differential sensory block: spinal vs epidural with lidocaine. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 1049-53.CrossRef White JL, Stevens RA, Kao TC. Differential sensory block: spinal vs epidural with lidocaine. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 1049-53.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nor NM, Russell IF. Assessing blocks after spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: how different questions affect findings from the same stimulus. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013; 22: 294-7.CrossRef Nor NM, Russell IF. Assessing blocks after spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: how different questions affect findings from the same stimulus. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013; 22: 294-7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yentis SM. Height of confusion: assessing regional blocks before caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 2-6.CrossRef Yentis SM. Height of confusion: assessing regional blocks before caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2006; 15: 2-6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Russell IF. A comparison of cold, pinprick and touch for assessing the level of spinal block at caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13: 146-52.CrossRef Russell IF. A comparison of cold, pinprick and touch for assessing the level of spinal block at caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13: 146-52.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mowat I, Tang R, Vaghadia H, Krebs C, Henderson WR, Sawka A. Epidural distribution of dye administered via an epidural catheter in a porcine model. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116: 277-81.CrossRef Mowat I, Tang R, Vaghadia H, Krebs C, Henderson WR, Sawka A. Epidural distribution of dye administered via an epidural catheter in a porcine model. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116: 277-81.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Russell IF. Assessing the block for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2001; 10: 83-5.CrossRef Russell IF. Assessing the block for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2001; 10: 83-5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of sensory block during labour epidural analgesia: a prospective cohort study to determine the influence of the direction of testing
Authors
Eliane Cristina de Souza Soares, MD
Mrinalini Balki, MD
Kristi Downey, MSc
Xiang Y. Ye, MSc
Jose Carlos A. Carvalho, MD, PhD
Publication date
14-03-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-022-02228-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 6/2022 Go to the issue