Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 7/2012

01-08-2012 | Original article

Assessment of bone scans in advanced prostate carcinoma using fully automated and semi-automated bone scan index methods

Authors: Yoshiko Takahashi, Mana Yoshimura, Kunihito Suzuki, Tsuyoshi Hashimoto, Hideji Hirose, Kenji Uchida, Shingo Inoue, Kiyoshi Koizumi, Koichi Tokuuye

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

As metastasis of prostate carcinoma occurs in approximately 80 % of terminal prostate carcinoma patients, the prognostic value of the prediction of prostate carcinoma by bone scintigraphy is important. We compared the automated and semi-automated bone scan index (BSI) system with extent of disease (EOD) grade if there is a possibility to substitute for EOD grading.

Materials and methods

We evaluated the bone scintigraphic images of 158 prostate carcinoma patients (mean age, 69.2 years old; range 50–97). Bone scans were obtained approximately 3 h after the intravenous injection of 740 MBq technetium-99 m-methylene diphosphonate. EOD grade was evaluated by 2 experienced radiologists using bone scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography. We calculated the BSI using the Bonenavi® system (Fujifilm RI Pharma Co., Ltd.), utilizing data from a Japanese database. The semi-automated BSI of the patients was obtained by modifying the automated BSI independently by 3 radiologists (referred to as “observers” in this study) with 25, 10, and 4 years of experience. We then compared the EOD with the corresponding 4 independent BSIs for each patient. We used the Steel–Dwass test for multiple comparisons of the BSI among different EOD groups of patients. We analyzed the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve to determine the cutoff values of sensitivity and specificity, which were both set at 95 %.

Results

There were significant correlations observed among the mean EOD and BSI scores as determined using the Bonenavi® system for every patient group for all observers and the automated method. There was also a statistically significant difference in the mean BSI among all EOD groups (grades 0, 1, or 2–4) for all observers and the automated method. Each ROC curve showed an ideal shape and was within the optimal cutoff range.

Conclusion

On the basis of the present results, BSI as calculated using the Bonenavi® system significantly correlated with EOD. Sensitivity and specificity as measured by the fully automated method were lower than those of semi-automated BSI with modification by radiologists. Therefore, semi-automated BSI is considered to have the possibility to substitute for EOD grading to predict the survival of prostate carcinoma patients with bone metastases, with only slight interobserver variation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Namiki M, Akaza H, Lee SE, Song JM, Umbas R, Zhou L, et al. Prostate Cancer Working Group report. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40(Suppl 1):i70–5.PubMedCrossRef Namiki M, Akaza H, Lee SE, Song JM, Umbas R, Zhou L, et al. Prostate Cancer Working Group report. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40(Suppl 1):i70–5.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nakata S, Ohtake N, Yamanaka H. Epidemiology of prostate cancer in Japan. Nihon Rinsho. 2011;69 Suppl 5:181–186 (in Japanese). Nakata S, Ohtake N, Yamanaka H. Epidemiology of prostate cancer in Japan. Nihon Rinsho. 2011;69 Suppl 5:181–186 (in Japanese).
3.
go back to reference Knudson G, Grinis G, Lopez-Majano V, Sansi P, Targonski P, Rubenstein M, et al. Bone scan as a stratification variable in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 1991;68:316–20.PubMedCrossRef Knudson G, Grinis G, Lopez-Majano V, Sansi P, Targonski P, Rubenstein M, et al. Bone scan as a stratification variable in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 1991;68:316–20.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Amico S, Liehn JC, Desoize B, Larbre H, Deltour G, Valeyre J. Comparison of phosphatase isoenzymes PAP and PSA with bone scan in prostate carcinoma. J Clin Nucl Med. 1991;13:643–8.CrossRef Amico S, Liehn JC, Desoize B, Larbre H, Deltour G, Valeyre J. Comparison of phosphatase isoenzymes PAP and PSA with bone scan in prostate carcinoma. J Clin Nucl Med. 1991;13:643–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Soloway MS, Hardeman SW, Hickey D, Raymond J, Todd B, Soloway S, et al. Stratification of patients with metastatic prostate cancer based on extent of disease on initial bone scan. Cancer. 1988;61:195–202.PubMedCrossRef Soloway MS, Hardeman SW, Hickey D, Raymond J, Todd B, Soloway S, et al. Stratification of patients with metastatic prostate cancer based on extent of disease on initial bone scan. Cancer. 1988;61:195–202.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Erdi YE, Humm JL, Imbriaco M, Yeung H, Larson SM. Quantitative bone metastases analysis based on image segmentation. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1401–6.PubMed Erdi YE, Humm JL, Imbriaco M, Yeung H, Larson SM. Quantitative bone metastases analysis based on image segmentation. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1401–6.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Imbriaco M, Larson SM, Yeung HW, Mawlawi OR, Erdi Y, Venkatraman ES, et al. A new parameter for measuring metastatic bone involvement by prostate cancer: the bone scan index. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:1765–72.PubMed Imbriaco M, Larson SM, Yeung HW, Mawlawi OR, Erdi Y, Venkatraman ES, et al. A new parameter for measuring metastatic bone involvement by prostate cancer: the bone scan index. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:1765–72.PubMed
8.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiation Protection. Publication 23: report of the task group on reference man. New York: Pergamon Press; 1992. International Commission on Radiation Protection. Publication 23: report of the task group on reference man. New York: Pergamon Press; 1992.
9.
go back to reference Sadik M, Jakobsson D, Olofsson F, Ohlsson M, Suukula M, Edenbrandt L. A new computer-based decision-support system for the interpretation of bone scans. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:417–23.PubMedCrossRef Sadik M, Jakobsson D, Olofsson F, Ohlsson M, Suukula M, Edenbrandt L. A new computer-based decision-support system for the interpretation of bone scans. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:417–23.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sadik M, Suurkula M, Höglund P, Järund A, Edenbrandt L. Quality of planar whole-body bone scan interpretations—a nationwide survey. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1464–72.PubMedCrossRef Sadik M, Suurkula M, Höglund P, Järund A, Edenbrandt L. Quality of planar whole-body bone scan interpretations—a nationwide survey. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1464–72.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sadik M, Hamadeh I, Nordblom P, Suurkula M, Höglund P, Ohlsson M, Edenbrandt L. Computer-assisted interpretation of planar whole-body bone scans. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1958–65.PubMedCrossRef Sadik M, Hamadeh I, Nordblom P, Suurkula M, Höglund P, Ohlsson M, Edenbrandt L. Computer-assisted interpretation of planar whole-body bone scans. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1958–65.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sadik M, Suurkula M, Höglund P, Järund A, Edenbrandt L. Improved classifications of planar whole-body bone scans using a computer-assisted diagnosis system: a multicenter, multiple-reader, multiple-case study. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:368–75.PubMedCrossRef Sadik M, Suurkula M, Höglund P, Järund A, Edenbrandt L. Improved classifications of planar whole-body bone scans using a computer-assisted diagnosis system: a multicenter, multiple-reader, multiple-case study. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:368–75.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment of bone scans in advanced prostate carcinoma using fully automated and semi-automated bone scan index methods
Authors
Yoshiko Takahashi
Mana Yoshimura
Kunihito Suzuki
Tsuyoshi Hashimoto
Hideji Hirose
Kenji Uchida
Shingo Inoue
Kiyoshi Koizumi
Koichi Tokuuye
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-012-0617-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 7/2012 Go to the issue