Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-10-2016 | Review

Assessment and planning for oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery: a review and a proposed chart

Author: Amit Agrawal

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2016

Abstract

Assessment for oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery (ORBS) can be time-consuming and subjective with a prolonged learning curve. Further, lack of recognition of options may lead to loss of patient choices whether available locally or not. This article reviews and incorporates essential variables into an author-designed chart with components of clinic consultation (“History” and “Examination”) that classify individual cases into one of the three complexities: high, average and low. Based on these complexities, decision-making processes are discussed in order to achieve, safely and realistically, both subjective and objective (anticipated versus achieved) goals of ORBS. This article by summarising literature around common ORBS variables attempts to streamline decision-making process as well as charts out variables to facilitate audit of decision-making and case selection process.

Level of Evidence: Not ratable

Rainsbury D, Willett A (eds) (2012) Oncoplastic breast reconstruction: guidelines for best practice. ABS & BAPRAS, UK. http://www.associationofbreastsurgery.org.uk/media/23851/final_oncoplastic_guidelines_for_use.pdf

Mukesh M, Harris E, Jena R, Evans P, Coles C (2012) Relationship between irradiated breast volume and late normal tissue complications: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol 104(1):1–10CrossRefPubMed

Mukesh MB, Barnett G, Cumming J et al (2012) Association of breast tumour bed seroma with post-operative complications and late normal tissue toxicity: results from the Cambridge Breast IMRT trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 38(10):918–924CrossRefPubMed

Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E (2011) An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg 127(2):514–524CrossRefPubMed

Israeli R, Feingold RS (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction in the setting of radiotherapy. Aesthet Surg J 31(7 Suppl):51S–64SCrossRefPubMed

Schmitz M, Bertram M, Kneser U, Keller AK, Horch RE (2013) Experimental total wrapping of breast implants with acellular dermal matrix: a preventive tool against capsular contracture in breast surgery? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(10):1382–1389CrossRefPubMed

Stump A, Holton LH 3rd, Connor J, Harper JR, Slezak S, Silverman RP (2009) The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):82–91CrossRefPubMed

Myckatyn TM, Cavallo JA, Sharma K et al (2015) The impact of chemotherapy and radiation therapy on the remodeling of acellular dermal matrices in staged, prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(1):43e–57eCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Taghizadeh R, Moustaki M, Harris S, Roblin P, Farhadi J (2015) Does post-mastectomy radiotherapy affect the outcome and prevalence of complications in immediate DIEP breast reconstruction? A prospective cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(10):1379–85CrossRefPubMed

10.

Hamdi M, Larsen M, Craggs B, Vanmierlo B, Zeltzer A (2014) Harvesting free abdominal perforator flaps in the presence of previous upper abdominal scars. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(2):219–225CrossRefPubMed

11.

Teunis T, van Voss MR H, Kon M, van Maurik JF (2013) CT-angiography prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 33(6):496–502CrossRefPubMed

12.

Keys KA, Louie O, Said HK, Neligan PC, Mathes DW (2013) Clinical utility of CT angiography in DIEP breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(3):e61–65CrossRefPubMed

13.

Cina A, Barone-Adesi L, Rinaldi P et al (2013) Planning deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: a comparison between multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol 23(8):2333–2343CrossRefPubMed

14.

Patel KM, Basci D, Nahabedian MY (2013) Multiple pregnancies following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(3):434–436CrossRefPubMed

15.

Ibrahim AM, Shuster M, Koolen PG et al (2013) Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1057–1066CrossRefPubMed

16.

Robert G, Duhamel A, Alet JM, Pelissier P, Pinsolle V (2014) Complications of breast reduction about 715 breasts. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 59(2):97–102CrossRefPubMed

17.

Agrawal A, Sibbering DM, Courtney CA (2013) Skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a review. Eur J Surg Oncol 39(4):320–328CrossRefPubMed

18.

Lutringer J, Flipo B, Carles M, Gal J, Chignon-Sicard B (2012) Functional impairment and its impact on sporting activities after latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 57(6):567–574CrossRefPubMed

19.

Spear SL, Economides JM, Shuck J, Patel KM (2014) Analyzing implant movement with tabbed and nontabbed expanders through the process of two-stage breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3):256e–260eCrossRefPubMed

20.

Reitsamer R, Peintinger F (2015) Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68(2):162–167CrossRefPubMed

21.

NICE: Breast Cancer Quality Standard. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/QS12 2011.

22.

Parker PA, Peterson SK, Bedrosian I et al: Prospective study of surgical decision-making processes for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg 2015

23.

Arving C, Sjoden PO, Bergh J et al (2007) Individual psychosocial support for breast cancer patients: a randomized study of nurse versus psychologist interventions and standard care. Cancer Nurs 30(3):E10–19CrossRefPubMed

24.

Remmers H, Holtgrawe M, Pinkert C (2010) Stress and nursing care needs of women with breast cancer during primary treatment: a qualitative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14(1):11–16CrossRefPubMed

25.

Thomsen JB, Gunnarsson GL (2014) The evolving breast reconstruction: from latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap to a propeller thoracodorsal fasciocutaneous flap. Gland Surg 3(3):151–154

26.

Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Hijjawi JB, Roche N, Blondeel P, Monstrey S (2008) Surgical technique in pedicled thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps: a clinical experience with 99 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(5):1632–1641CrossRefPubMed

27.

Vaughn CJ, Peled AW, Esserman LJ, Foster RD: Feasibility of performing total skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with prior circumareolar mastopexy or reduction mammoplasty incisions. Ann Plast Surg 2013

28.

Alperovich M, Tanna N, Samra F et al (2013) Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with a history of reduction mammaplasty or mastopexy: how safe is it? Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):962–967CrossRefPubMed

29.

Al-Mufarrej FM, Woods JE, Jacobson SR (2013) Simultaneous mastopexy in patients undergoing prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(6):747–755CrossRefPubMed

30.

Beale EW, Ramanadham S, Harrison B, Rasko Y, Armijo B, Rohrich RJ (2014) Achieving predictability in augmentation mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3):284e–292eCrossRefPubMed

31.

Tuli R, Flynn RA, Brill KL, Sabol JL, Usuki KY, Rosenberg AL (2006) Diagnosis, treatment, and management of breast cancer in previously augmented women. Breast J 12(4):343–348CrossRefPubMed

32.

Clemens MW, Kronowitz SJ (2012) Acellular dermal matrix in irradiated tissue expander/implant–based breast reconstruction: evidence-based review. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5S-2):27S–34SCrossRefPubMed

33.

Kim JYS, Davila AA, Persing S et al (2012) A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(1):28–41CrossRefPubMed

34.

Clough K, Kaufman G, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati I (2010) Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 17(5):1375–1391CrossRefPubMed

35.

Lee JW, Kim MC, Park HY, Yang JD (2014) Oncoplastic volume replacement techniques according to the excised volume and tumor location in small- to moderate-sized breasts. Gland Surg 3(1):14–21PubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Nava MB, Ottolenghi J, Pennati A et al (2012) Skin/nipple sparing mastectomies and implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with large and ptotic breast: oncological and reconstructive results. Breast 21(3):267–271CrossRefPubMed

37.

Richardson H, Ma G (2012) The Goldilocks mastectomy. Int J Surg 10(9):522–526CrossRefPubMed

38.

Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, Hwang BH, Chan LS, Wong AK (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 68(4):346–356CrossRefPubMed

39.

Park HC, Kim HY, Kim MC et al (2014) Partial breast reconstruction using various oncoplastic techniques for centrally located breast cancer. Arch Plast Surg 41(5):520–528CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Davies K, Allan L, Roblin P, Ross D, Farhadi J (2011) Factors affecting post-operative complications following skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Breast 20(1):21–25CrossRefPubMed

41.

Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G, Sinna R (2009) Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J 29(5):360–376CrossRefPubMed

42.

Petit JY, Rietjens M, Botteri E et al (2013) Evaluation of fat grafting safety in patients with intraepithelial neoplasia: a matched-cohort study. Ann Oncol 24(6):1479–1484CrossRefPubMed

43.

Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S (2009) Septum-based mammaplasty: a surgical technique based on Wuringer’s septum for breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(2):443–454CrossRefPubMed

44.

Andrade RA, Coca KP, Abrao AC (2010) Breastfeeding pattern in the first month of life in women submitted to breast reduction and augmentation. J Pediatr (Rio J) 86(3):239–244CrossRef

45.

Thibaudeau S, Sinno H, Williams B (2010) The effects of breast reduction on successful breastfeeding: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(10):1688–1693CrossRefPubMed

46.

Kakagia D, Tripsiannis G, Tsoutsos D (2005) Breastfeeding after reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of 3 techniques. Ann Plast Surg 55(4):343–345CrossRefPubMed

47.

Leal SC, Stuart SR, Carvalho Hde A (2013) Breast irradiation and lactation: a review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 13(2):159–164CrossRefPubMed

Title: Assessment and planning for oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery: a review and a proposed chart
Author: Amit Agrawal
Publication date: 01-10-2016
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1221-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Assessment and planning for oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery: a review and a proposed chart

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Blood supply to the second metatarsophalangeal joint—anatomical injection study and clinical correlation for free vascularised joint transfer

Interest in cosmetic surgery among Iranian women: the role of self-esteem, narcissism, and self-perceived attractiveness

Post-traumatic onset of secondary progression of gynecomastia

Lipofilling may induce nerve regeneration after previous traumatic injury: a clinical case with remarkable outcome

Combined anterolateral chest and medial arm flap for treatment of degloving injuries of four digits

Levels of evidence in plastic surgery—bibliometric trends and comparison with five other surgical specialties