Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Assessing willingness to pay for health care quality improvements

Authors: Md Sadik Pavel, Sayan Chakrabarty, Jeff Gow

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Contingent valuation (CV) is used to estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) of consumers for specific attributes to improve the quality of health care they received in three hospitals in Bangladesh.

Methods

Random sample of 252 patients were interviewed to measure their willingness to pay for seven specified improvements in the quality of delivered medical care. Partial tobit regression and corresponding marginal effects analysis were used to analyze the data and obtain WTP estimates.

Results

Patients are willing to pay more if their satisfaction with three attributes of care are increased. These are: a closer doctor-patient relationship, increased drug availability and increased chances of recovery. The doctor patient relationship is considered most important by patients and exhibited the highest willingness to pay.

Conclusions

This study provides important information to policy makers about the monetary valuation of patients for improvements in certain attributes of health care in Bangladesh.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adams MA, Ahmed T, Arifeen E, Evans GT, Huda T, Reichenbach L. Innovation for universal health coverage in Bangladesh: a call to action. Lancet. 2013;382(9910):2104–11.CrossRefPubMed Adams MA, Ahmed T, Arifeen E, Evans GT, Huda T, Reichenbach L. Innovation for universal health coverage in Bangladesh: a call to action. Lancet. 2013;382(9910):2104–11.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Majumder MA. World Health Statistics 2011: How does Bangladesh compare with other South-East Asian countries? South East Asia J Public Health. 2011;1:4–11. Majumder MA. World Health Statistics 2011: How does Bangladesh compare with other South-East Asian countries? South East Asia J Public Health. 2011;1:4–11.
3.
go back to reference Mitchell R, Carson R. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future; 1989. Mitchell R, Carson R. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future; 1989.
4.
go back to reference Adamowicz W, Boxall P, Williams M, Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiment and contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ. 1998;80:64–75.CrossRef Adamowicz W, Boxall P, Williams M, Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiment and contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ. 1998;80:64–75.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environ Resour Econ. 2000;19:173–210.CrossRef Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environ Resour Econ. 2000;19:173–210.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nocera S, Telser H, Bonato D. The contingent valuation method in health care. Heidelberg: Springer; 2003.CrossRef Nocera S, Telser H, Bonato D. The contingent valuation method in health care. Heidelberg: Springer; 2003.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Green C, Gerard K. Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2009;18:951–76.CrossRefPubMed Green C, Gerard K. Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2009;18:951–76.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mataria A, Donaldson C, Luchini S, Moatti JP. A stated preference approach to assessing health care-quality improvements in Palestine: from theoretical validity to policy implications. J Health Econ. 2004;23:1285–311.CrossRefPubMed Mataria A, Donaldson C, Luchini S, Moatti JP. A stated preference approach to assessing health care-quality improvements in Palestine: from theoretical validity to policy implications. J Health Econ. 2004;23:1285–311.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions. Health Econ. 2004;13:563–73.CrossRefPubMed Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions. Health Econ. 2004;13:563–73.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference O’Brien B, Gafni A. When do the “dollars” make sense? Toward a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care. Med Decis Mak. 1996;16:288–99.CrossRef O’Brien B, Gafni A. When do the “dollars” make sense? Toward a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care. Med Decis Mak. 1996;16:288–99.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kim T, Kwak S, Yoo S. Applying multi-attribute utility theory to decision making in environmental planning: a case study of the electric utility in Korea. J Environ Econ Manag. 1998;1:597–609. Kim T, Kwak S, Yoo S. Applying multi-attribute utility theory to decision making in environmental planning: a case study of the electric utility in Korea. J Environ Econ Manag. 1998;1:597–609.
13.
go back to reference McDaniels T, Roessler C. Multiattribute elicitation of wilderness preservation benefits: a constructive approach. Ecol Econ. 1998;1998(7):299–312.CrossRef McDaniels T, Roessler C. Multiattribute elicitation of wilderness preservation benefits: a constructive approach. Ecol Econ. 1998;1998(7):299–312.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ekstrand C, Carpenter TE. Using a tobit regression model to analyse risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in commercially grown broilers. Prev Vet Med. 1998;37:219–28.CrossRefPubMed Ekstrand C, Carpenter TE. Using a tobit regression model to analyse risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in commercially grown broilers. Prev Vet Med. 1998;37:219–28.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference McDonald JF, Moffitt RA. The uses of Tobit analysis. Rev Econ Stat. 1980;62:318–21.CrossRef McDonald JF, Moffitt RA. The uses of Tobit analysis. Rev Econ Stat. 1980;62:318–21.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tobin J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica. 1958;26:24–36.CrossRef Tobin J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica. 1958;26:24–36.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Donaldson C. Valuing the benefits of publicly-provided health care: does ‘ability to pay’ preclude the use of ‘willingness to pay’? Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:551–63.CrossRefPubMed Donaldson C. Valuing the benefits of publicly-provided health care: does ‘ability to pay’ preclude the use of ‘willingness to pay’? Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:551–63.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Donaldson C, Jones AM, Mapp TJ, Olson JA. Limited dependent variables in willingness to pay studies: application in health care. Appl Econ. 1998;30:667–77.CrossRef Donaldson C, Jones AM, Mapp TJ, Olson JA. Limited dependent variables in willingness to pay studies: application in health care. Appl Econ. 1998;30:667–77.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ramsey JB. Tests for specification errors in classical linear least squares regression analysis. J Roy Stat Soc. 1969;31:350–71. Ramsey JB. Tests for specification errors in classical linear least squares regression analysis. J Roy Stat Soc. 1969;31:350–71.
20.
go back to reference Roncek DW. Learning more from Tobit coefficients: extending a comparative analysis of political protest. Am Sociol Rev. 1992;57:503–7.CrossRef Roncek DW. Learning more from Tobit coefficients: extending a comparative analysis of political protest. Am Sociol Rev. 1992;57:503–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessing willingness to pay for health care quality improvements
Authors
Md Sadik Pavel
Sayan Chakrabarty
Jeff Gow
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0678-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Health Services Research 1/2015 Go to the issue