Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Assessing the usability by clinicians of VISION: A hierarchical display of patient-collected physiological information to clinicians

Authors: Cubby L. Gardner, Fang Liu, Paul Fontelo, Michael C. Flanagan, Albert Hoang, Harry B. Burke

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The inability of patients to accurately and completely recount their clinical status between clinic visits reduces the clinician’s ability to properly manage their patients. One way to improve this situation is to collect objective patient information while the patients are at home and display the collected multi-day clinical information in parallel on a single screen, highlighting threshold violations for each channel, and allowing the viewer to drill down to any analog signal on the same screen, while maintaining the overall physiological context of the patient. All this would be accomplished in a way that was easy for the clinician to view and use.

Methods

Patients used five mobile devices to collect six heart failure-related clinical variables: body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, blood oxygen saturation, physical activity, and subjective input. Fourteen clinicians practicing in a heart failure clinic rated the display using the System Usability Scale that, for acceptability, had an expected mean of 68 (SD, 12.5). In addition, we calculated the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of the clinician responses using a two-way, mixed effects model, ICC (3,1).

Results

We developed a single-screen temporal hierarchical display (VISION) that summarizes the patient’s home monitoring activities between clinic visits. The overall System Usability Scale score was 92 (95% CI, 87-97), p < 0.0001; the ICC was 0.89 (CI, 0.79-0.97), p < 0.0001.

Conclusion

Clinicians consistently found VISION to be highly usable. To our knowledge, this is the first single-screen, parallel variable, temporal hierarchical display of both continuous and discrete information acquired by patients at home between clinic visits that presents clinically significant information at the point of care in a manner that is usable by clinicians.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Wang PS, Benner JS, Glynn RJ, Winkelmayer WC, Mogun H, Avorn J. How well do patients report noncompliance with antihypertensive medications?: a comparison of self-report versus filled prescriptions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004;13(1):11–9. doi:10.1002/pds.819.CrossRefPubMed Wang PS, Benner JS, Glynn RJ, Winkelmayer WC, Mogun H, Avorn J. How well do patients report noncompliance with antihypertensive medications?: a comparison of self-report versus filled prescriptions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004;13(1):11–9. doi:10.​1002/​pds.​819.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Beaudin JS, Intille SS, Morris ME. To track or not to track: user reactions to concepts in longitudinal health monitoring. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(4):e29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beaudin JS, Intille SS, Morris ME. To track or not to track: user reactions to concepts in longitudinal health monitoring. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(4):e29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Fox S, Duggan M. Tracking for Health. 2013. Fox S, Duggan M. Tracking for Health. 2013.
9.
go back to reference Rind A, Wang TD, Aigner W, Miksch S, Wongsuphasawat K, Plaisant C, Shneiderman B. Interactive information visualization to explore and query electronic health records. Foundations Trends Human-Comput Interaction. 2011;5(3):207–98.CrossRef Rind A, Wang TD, Aigner W, Miksch S, Wongsuphasawat K, Plaisant C, Shneiderman B. Interactive information visualization to explore and query electronic health records. Foundations Trends Human-Comput Interaction. 2011;5(3):207–98.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Plaisant C, Milash B, Rose A, Widoff S, Shneiderman B. LifeLines: visualizing personal histories. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: ACM; 1996. p. 221–7. Plaisant C, Milash B, Rose A, Widoff S, Shneiderman B. LifeLines: visualizing personal histories. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: ACM; 1996. p. 221–7.
12.
go back to reference Bui AA, Aberle DR, Kangarloo H. TimeLine: visualizing integrated patient records. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2007;11(4):462–73.CrossRefPubMed Bui AA, Aberle DR, Kangarloo H. TimeLine: visualizing integrated patient records. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2007;11(4):462–73.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Martins SB, Shahar Y, Galperin M, Kaizer H, Goren-Bar D, McNaughton D, Basso LV, Goldstein MK. Evaluation of KNAVE-II: a tool for intelligent query and exploration of patient data. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):648–52.PubMed Martins SB, Shahar Y, Galperin M, Kaizer H, Goren-Bar D, McNaughton D, Basso LV, Goldstein MK. Evaluation of KNAVE-II: a tool for intelligent query and exploration of patient data. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):648–52.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Bade R, Schlechtweg S, Miksch S. Connecting time-oriented data and information to a coherent interactive visualization. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vienna, Austria: ACM; 2004. p. 105–12. Bade R, Schlechtweg S, Miksch S. Connecting time-oriented data and information to a coherent interactive visualization. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vienna, Austria: ACM; 2004. p. 105–12.
21.
go back to reference Brooke J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval Industry. 1996;189:194. Brooke J. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval Industry. 1996;189:194.
25.
go back to reference Sauro J. A Practical Guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, Benchmarks, and Best Practices. In. Denver: Measuring Usability, LLC; 2011. Sauro J. A Practical Guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, Benchmarks, and Best Practices. In. Denver: Measuring Usability, LLC; 2011.
26.
go back to reference Lewis JR, Sauro J. The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale. In: Kurosu M. (eds)Human Centered Design. HCD 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5619. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. Lewis JR, Sauro J. The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale. In: Kurosu M. (eds)Human Centered Design. HCD 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5619. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009.
27.
go back to reference Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud. 2009;4(3):114–23. Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud. 2009;4(3):114–23.
28.
go back to reference Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2008;24(6):574–94.CrossRef Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2008;24(6):574–94.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Cleveland WS, McGill R. Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data. Science (New York, NY). 1985;229(4716):828–33.CrossRef Cleveland WS, McGill R. Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data. Science (New York, NY). 1985;229(4716):828–33.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Furnas GW. Generalized fisheye views. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston, Massachusetts: ACM; 1986. p. 16–23. Furnas GW. Generalized fisheye views. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston, Massachusetts: ACM; 1986. p. 16–23.
32.
go back to reference Baudisch P, Good N, Bellotti V, Schraedley P. Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02). New York: ACM; 2002. p.259-266. Baudisch P, Good N, Bellotti V, Schraedley P. Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02). New York: ACM; 2002. p.259-266.
34.
go back to reference Jackson JL, O’Malley PG, Kroenke K. A psychometric comparison of military and civilian medical practices. Mil Med. 1999;164(2):112–5.PubMed Jackson JL, O’Malley PG, Kroenke K. A psychometric comparison of military and civilian medical practices. Mil Med. 1999;164(2):112–5.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Jackson JL, Strong J, Cheng EY, Meyer G. Patients, diagnoses, and procedures in a military internal medicine clinic: comparison with civilian practices. Mil Med. 1999;164(3):194–7.PubMed Jackson JL, Strong J, Cheng EY, Meyer G. Patients, diagnoses, and procedures in a military internal medicine clinic: comparison with civilian practices. Mil Med. 1999;164(3):194–7.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Jackson JL, Cheng EY, Jones DL, Meyer G. Comparison of discharge diagnoses and inpatient procedures between military and civilian health care systems. Mil Med. 1999;164(10):701–4.PubMed Jackson JL, Cheng EY, Jones DL, Meyer G. Comparison of discharge diagnoses and inpatient procedures between military and civilian health care systems. Mil Med. 1999;164(10):701–4.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessing the usability by clinicians of VISION: A hierarchical display of patient-collected physiological information to clinicians
Authors
Cubby L. Gardner
Fang Liu
Paul Fontelo
Michael C. Flanagan
Albert Hoang
Harry B. Burke
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0435-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2017 Go to the issue