Top

European Spine Journal

Published in:

Open Access 17-02-2024 | Review Article

Assessing the predictive power of the GAP score on mechanical complications: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Minseong Cho, Sanghoon Lee, Ho-Joong Kim

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 4/2024

Abstract

Purpose

The prevention of mechanical complications (MC) is a major concern in adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction surgery; thus, the global alignment and proportion (GAP) score was developed to assess MC risk. Numerous studies have clarified the validity of the GAP score, but their contradictory results have prevented researchers from reaching compelling conclusions. This study aimed to analyze the predictive power of the GAP score on MC via a meta-analysis.

Methods

A total of 1,617 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Studies relevant to the GAP score and MC were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL and screened according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The GAP score categories of the patients and their MC/revision surgery status were collected. The data collected for the meta-analysis of odds ratios (OR) included the number of patients in the GAP score subgroups and their MC/revision surgery status. To calculate the OR, three GAP score subgroups were combined into two groups; hence, the analysis was conducted twice (gap proportioned [GAP-P] and higher groups, and gap severely disproportioned [GAP-SD] and lower groups).

Results

Eleven studies were collected; of them, revision surgery data were available for seven. The proportion of MC in the studies was 27.7–60.6%, while that of revision surgery was 11.7–34.9%. In the meta-analysis of the GAP-P and higher score groups, the difference in MC ratio was significant (OR = 2.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20–6.67; P = 0.02), whereas that for revision surgery was not. For the GAP-SD and lower score groups, the GAP-SD group had significantly higher proportions of both MC (OR = 2.65; 95% CI = 1.57–4.45; P < 0.001) and revision surgery (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.33–3.88; P = 0.003). Publication bias was significant only in the latter MC analysis.

Conclusion

The GAP score offers predictive value for the risk of mechanical complications.

Diebo BG, Shah NV, Boachie-Adjei O, Zhu F, Rothenfluh DA, Paulino CB, Schwab FJ, Lafage V (2019) Adult spinal deformity. Lancet 394:160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31125-0CrossRefPubMed

Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstuck F, Perez-Grueso FJS, Acaroglu E, Haddad S, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A, European Spine Study G (2017) Global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1661–1672. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01594CrossRef

Cho SK, Shin JI, Kim YJ (2014) Proximal junctional kyphosis following adult spinal deformity surgery. Eur Spine J 23:2726–2736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3531-4CrossRefPubMed

Lau D, Clark AJ, Scheer JK, Daubs MD, Coe JD, Paonessa KJ, LaGrone MO, Kasten MD, Amaral RA, Trobisch PD, Lee JH, Fabris-Monterumici D, Anand N, Cree AK, Hart RA, Hey LA, Ames CP, Committee SRSASD (2014) Proximal junctional kyphosis and failure after spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature as a background to classification development. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:2093–2102. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000627CrossRefPubMed

Liu FY, Wang T, Yang SD, Wang H, Yang DL, Ding WY (2016) Incidence and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 25:2376–2383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4534-0CrossRefPubMed

Kim JS, Phan K, Cheung ZB, Lee N, Vargas L, Arvind V, Merrill RK, Gidumal S, Di Capua J, Overley S, Dowdell J, Cho SK (2019) Surgical, radiographic, and patient-related risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a meta-analysis. Global Spine J 9:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218761362CrossRefPubMed

Han X, Ren J (2022) Risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after correction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 56:158–165. https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.21255CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jacobs E, van Royen BJ, van Kuijk SMJ, Merk JMR, Stadhouder A, van Rhijn LW, Willems PC (2019) Prediction of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery-the GAP score versus the Schwab classification. Spine J 19:781–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.11.013CrossRefPubMed

Gupta MC, Yilgor C, Moon HJ, Lertudomphonwanit T, Alanay A, Lenke L, Bridwell KH (2021) Evaluation of global alignment and proportion score in an independent database. Spine J 21:1549–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.004CrossRefPubMed

10.

Bari TJ, Ohrt-Nissen S, Hansen LV, Dahl B, Gehrchen M (2019) Ability of the global alignment and proportion score to predict mechanical failure following adult spinal deformity surgery-validation in 149 patients with 2-year follow-up. Spine Deform 7:331–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.08.002CrossRefPubMed

11.

Baum GR, Ha AS, Cerpa M, Zuckerman SL, Lin JD, Menger RP, Osorio JA, Morr S, Leung E, Lehman RA, Sardar Z, Lenke LG (2020) Does the global alignment and proportion score overestimate mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity correction? J Neurosurg Spine 34:96–102. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.6.SPINE20538CrossRefPubMed

12.

Kwan KYH, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, Carreon LY, Dahl BT, Fehlings MG, Ames CP, Boachie-Adjei O, Dekutoski MB, Kebaish KM, Lewis SJ, Matsuyama Y, Mehdian H, Qiu Y, Schwab FJ, Cheung KMC, Deformity AOSKF (2021) Are higher global alignment and proportion scores associated with increased risks of mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery? An external validation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 479:312–320. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001521CrossRefPubMed

13.

Sun X, Sun W, Sun S, Hu H, Zhang S, Kong C, Lu S (2021) Which sagittal evaluation system can effectively predict mechanical complications in the treatment of elderly patients with adult degenerative scoliosis? Roussouly classification or global alignment and proportion (GAP) score. J Orthop Surg Res 16:641. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02786-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Quarto E, Zanirato A, Pellegrini M, Vaggi S, Vitali F, Bourret S, Le Huec JC, Formica M (2022) GAP score potential in predicting post-operative spinal mechanical complications: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 31:3286–3295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07386-6CrossRefPubMed

15.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535CrossRef

16.

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schunemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A (2011) GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 64:380–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011CrossRefPubMed

17.

Kim SY, Park JE, Lee YJ, Seo HJ, Sheen SS, Hahn S, Jang BH, Son HJ (2013) Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. J Clin Epidemiol 66:408–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.016CrossRefPubMed

18.

Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D, DeWald C, Mehdian H, Shaffrey C, Tribus C, Lafage V (2012) Scoliosis research society-schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823e15e2CrossRefPubMed

19.

Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Yavuz Y, Abul K, Boissiere L, Haddad S, Obeid I, Kleinstuck F, Sanchez Perez-Grueso FJ, Acaroglu E, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A, European Spine Study G (2017) Relative lumbar lordosis and lordosis distribution index: individualized pelvic incidence-based proportional parameters that quantify lumbar lordosis more precisely than the concept of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. Neurosurg Focus 43:E5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17498CrossRef

20.

Soroceanu A, Diebo BG, Burton D, Smith JS, Deviren V, Shaffrey C, Kim HJ, Mundis G, Ames C, Errico T, Bess S, Hostin R, Hart R, Schwab F, Lafage V, International Spine Study G (2015) Radiographical and implant-related complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, patient risk factors, and impact on health-related quality of life. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:1414–1421. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001020CrossRef

21.

Roussouly P, Nnadi C (2010) Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J 19:1824–1836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1476-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Kim HJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Park MS, Song KS, Piyaskulkaew C, Chuntarapas T (2014) Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E576-580. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000246CrossRefPubMed

23.

Ham DW, Kim HJ, Choi JH, Park J, Lee J, Yeom JS (2021) Validity of the global alignment proportion (GAP) score in predicting mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery in elderly patients. Eur Spine J 30:1190–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06734-2CrossRefPubMed

24.

Teles AR, Aldebeyan S, Aoude A, Swamy G, Nicholls FH, Thomas KC, Jacobs WB (2022) Mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: can spinal alignment explain everything? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 47:E1–E9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004217CrossRefPubMed

25.

Noh SH, Ha Y, Park JY, Kuh SU, Chin DK, Kim KS, Cho YE, Lee HS, Kim KH (2021) Modified global alignment and proportion scoring with body mass index and bone mineral density analysis in global alignment and proportion score of each 3 categories for predicting mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. Neurospine 18:484–491. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142470.235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Baum GR, Ha AS, Cerpa M, Zuckerman SL, Lin JD, Menger RP, Osorio JA, Morr S, Leung E, Lehman RA, Sardar Z, Lenke LG (2020) Does the Global Alignment and Proportion score overestimate mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity correction? J Neurosurg Spine 34:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.6.Spine20538CrossRef

27.

Kawabata A, Yoshii T, Sakai K, Hirai T, Yuasa M, Inose H, Utagawa K, Hashimoto J, Matsukura Y, Tomori M, Torigoe I, Kusano K, Otani K, Mizuno K, Satoshi S, Kazuyuki F, Tomizawa S, Arai Y, Shindo S, Okawa A (2020) Identification of predictive factors for mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery: a multi-institutional retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45:1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003500CrossRefPubMed

28.

Kwan KYH, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, Carreon LY, Dahl BT, Fehlings MG, Ames CP, Boachie-Adjei O, Dekutoski MB, Kebaish KM, Lewis SJ, Matsuyama Y, Mehdian H, Qiu Y, Schwab FJ, Cheung KMC (2021) Are higher global alignment and proportion scores associated with increased risks of mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery? An external validation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 479:312–320. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000001521CrossRefPubMed

29.

Yagi M, Daimon K, Hosogane N, Okada E, Suzuki S, Tsuji O, Nagoshi N, Fujita N, Nakamura M, Matsumoto M, Watanabe K (2021) Predictive probability of the global alignment and proportion score for the development of mechanical failure following adult spinal deformity surgery in Asian patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 46:E80-e86. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000003738CrossRefPubMed

30.

Oe S, Yamato Y, Hasegawa T, Yoshida G, Banno T, Arima H, Ide K, Yamada T, Kurosu K, Nakai K, Yuki T, Matsuyama Y (2022) The validation study of preoperative surgical planning for corrective target in adult spinal deformity surgery with 5-year follow-up for mechanical complications. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07420-7CrossRefPubMed

Title: Assessing the predictive power of the GAP score on mechanical complications: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Minseong Cho
Sanghoon Lee
Ho-Joong Kim
Publication date: 17-02-2024
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Spine Journal / Issue 4/2024
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08135-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Assessing the predictive power of the GAP score on mechanical complications: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2024

Analysis of duration of different stages of surgery in posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients: comparison between severe versus non-severe AIS

In subjects with chronic low back pain, does neuropathia exclusively correlated to neuronal compression? A correlation study of PainDETECT questionnaire and corresponding MRI and X-ray findings

Analysis of adjacent vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty: do radiological or surgical features matter?

Sarcopenia and its effects on outcome of lumbar spine surgeries

The correlation between altmetric score and traditional measures of article impact for studies pertaining to spine trauma

Automatic assessment of scoliosis surgery outcome on trunk shape using left–right trunk asymmetry