Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

Assessing the link between implementation fidelity and health outcomes for a trial of intensive case management by community health workers: a mixed methods study protocol

Authors: Barbara Schmidt, Kerrianne Watt, Robyn McDermott, Jane Mills

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Better systems of care are required to address chronic disease in Indigenous people to ensure they can access all their care needs. Health research has produced evidence about effective models of care and chronic disease strategies to address Indigenous health, however the transfer of research findings into routine clinical practice has proven challenging. Complex interventions, such as those related to chronic disease, have many components that are often poorly implemented and hence rarely achieve implementation fidelity. Implementation fidelity is “the degree to which programs are implemented as intended by the program developer”. Knowing if an intervention was implemented as planned is fundamental to knowing what has contributed to the success of an intervention.

Methods

The aim of this study is to adapt the implementation fidelity framework developed by Keith et al. and apply it to the intervention implemented in phase 1 of the Getting Better at Chronic Care in North Queensland study. The objectives are to quantify the level of implementation fidelity achieved during phase 1 of the study, measure the association between implementation fidelity and health outcomes and to explore the features of the primary health care system that contributed to improved health outcomes. A convergent parallel mixed methods study design will be used to develop a process for assessing implementation fidelity. Information collected via a questionnaire and routine data generated during phase 1 of the study will be used to explain the context for the intervention in each site and develop an implementation fidelity score for each component of the intervention. A weighting will be applied to each component of the intervention to calculate the overall implementation score for each participating community. Statistical analysis will assess the level of association between implementation fidelity scores and health outcomes.

Discussion

Health services research seeks to find solutions to social and technical problems to improve health outcomes. The development of a tool and methodology for assessing implementation fidelity in the Indigenous primary health care context will help address some of the barriers to the translation of research into practice.

Trial registration

Literature
1.
go back to reference Oxfam. Closing the Gap: Solutions to Indigenous Health crisis facing Australia. Fitzroy: Oxfam; 2007. Oxfam. Closing the Gap: Solutions to Indigenous Health crisis facing Australia. Fitzroy: Oxfam; 2007.
2.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia Health 2014, in Australia’s health. Canberra: AIHW; 2014. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia Health 2014, in Australia’s health. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.
3.
go back to reference Wagner E, et al. Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action. Health Aff. 2001;20(6):64–78.CrossRef Wagner E, et al. Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action. Health Aff. 2001;20(6):64–78.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Liddy C, et al. The Community Connection Model: Implementation of best evidence into practice for self-management of chronic diseases. Public Health. 2013;127(6):538–45.CrossRefPubMed Liddy C, et al. The Community Connection Model: Implementation of best evidence into practice for self-management of chronic diseases. Public Health. 2013;127(6):538–45.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Griew R. The link between primary health care and health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. Canberra: Robert Griew Consulting; 2008. Griew R. The link between primary health care and health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. Canberra: Robert Griew Consulting; 2008.
6.
go back to reference Phillips A. Health status differentials across rural and remote Australia. Aust J Rural Health. 2009;17(1):2–9.CrossRefPubMed Phillips A. Health status differentials across rural and remote Australia. Aust J Rural Health. 2009;17(1):2–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Carey T, et al. What primary health care services should residents of rural and remote Australia be able to access? A systematic review of "core" primary health care services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carey T, et al. What primary health care services should residents of rural and remote Australia be able to access? A systematic review of "core" primary health care services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Gibson O, et al. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of primary health care interventions for Indigenous people with chronic diseases: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):1–11.CrossRef Gibson O, et al. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of primary health care interventions for Indigenous people with chronic diseases: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):1–11.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schmidt B, Campbell S, McDermott R. Community health workers as chronic care coordinators: evaluation of an Australian Indigenous primary health care program. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015;40(S1):S107–S114.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt B, Campbell S, McDermott R. Community health workers as chronic care coordinators: evaluation of an Australian Indigenous primary health care program. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015;40(S1):S107–S114.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Knight A, et al. Improving primary care in Australia through the Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program: a quality improvement report. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(11):948–55.CrossRefPubMed Knight A, et al. Improving primary care in Australia through the Australian Primary Care Collaboratives Program: a quality improvement report. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(11):948–55.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wise M. National Appraisal of Continuous Quality Improvement Initiatives in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Primary Health Care: Final report. Melbourne: Lowitja Insititute; 2013. Wise M. National Appraisal of Continuous Quality Improvement Initiatives in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Primary Health Care: Final report. Melbourne: Lowitja Insititute; 2013.
13.
go back to reference Schierhout G. Evaluating the effectiveness of a multifaceted, multilevel continuous quality improvement program in primary health care: Developing a realist theory of change. Implementation Sci. 2013;8:119.CrossRef Schierhout G. Evaluating the effectiveness of a multifaceted, multilevel continuous quality improvement program in primary health care: Developing a realist theory of change. Implementation Sci. 2013;8:119.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Glasgow R, Vogt T, Boles S. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Glasgow R, Vogt T, Boles S. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How Can We Increase Translation of Research into Practice? Types of Evidence Needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28(1):413–33.CrossRefPubMed Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How Can We Increase Translation of Research into Practice? Types of Evidence Needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28(1):413–33.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Glasziou P. Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice. BMJ. 2010;341:2010. Glasziou P. Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice. BMJ. 2010;341:2010.
18.
go back to reference Glasziou P, et al. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? Br Med J. 2008;336:1472–4.CrossRef Glasziou P, et al. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? Br Med J. 2008;336:1472–4.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Damschroder L, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Damschroder L, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Breitenstein SGD, Garvey C, Hill C, Fogg L, Resnick B. Implementation Fidelity in Community - Based Interventions. Natl Insititute Health. 2010;33(2):164–73. Breitenstein SGD, Garvey C, Hill C, Fogg L, Resnick B. Implementation Fidelity in Community - Based Interventions. Natl Insititute Health. 2010;33(2):164–73.
22.
go back to reference Glasgow R, et al. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns. 2001;44:119–27.CrossRefPubMed Glasgow R, et al. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns. 2001;44:119–27.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, et al. Using RE-AIM Metrics to Evaluate Diabetes Self-Management Support Interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(1):67–73.CrossRefPubMed Glasgow RE, et al. Using RE-AIM Metrics to Evaluate Diabetes Self-Management Support Interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(1):67–73.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Keith R, et al. Fidelity of implementation: development and testing of a measure. Implement Sc. 2010;5(1):99.CrossRef Keith R, et al. Fidelity of implementation: development and testing of a measure. Implement Sc. 2010;5(1):99.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Klein K, Sorra J. The Challenge of Innovation Implementation. Acad Manag Rev. 1996;21:1055–80. Klein K, Sorra J. The Challenge of Innovation Implementation. Acad Manag Rev. 1996;21:1055–80.
26.
go back to reference Schmidt B, et al. Getting better at chronic care in remote communities: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled of community based management. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):1017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schmidt B, et al. Getting better at chronic care in remote communities: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled of community based management. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):1017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Rittel H, Webber M. Dilemmas in General Theory of Planning. Policy Sci. 1973;4:155–69.CrossRef Rittel H, Webber M. Dilemmas in General Theory of Planning. Policy Sci. 1973;4:155–69.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kessler R, Glasgow R. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):637–44.CrossRefPubMed Kessler R, Glasgow R. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):637–44.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessing the link between implementation fidelity and health outcomes for a trial of intensive case management by community health workers: a mixed methods study protocol
Authors
Barbara Schmidt
Kerrianne Watt
Robyn McDermott
Jane Mills
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2320-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue