Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2016

01-04-2016 | Original Research

Assessing the Associations of Patient-Reported Perceptions of Patient-Centered Care as Supplemental Measures of Health Care Quality in VA

Authors: Bella Etingen, MA, Scott Miskevics, BS, Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Special Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are useful for assessing health care quality and safety and patients’ perceptions of health care.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the relationship between PREMS [e.g., measures of patient-centered care (PCC)] and health care quality metrics.

DESIGN

We conducted a national survey via mail. Survey data were supplemented with US Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) administrative data.

PARTICIPANTS

Veteran (n = 5512) VA health care users participated in the study.

MAIN MEASURES

PCC measures included: patient activation; shared decision-making (SDM); empathy and holistic care; chronic illness care; perceptions of participation, respect for choices, and support; and overall health care experience. Health care quality measures included: preventive care screening receipt; chronic condition management (diabetes, hypertension); and health care utilization (hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits). Analyses included: bivariate comparisons of PCC measures by health care quality measures; and multivariate linear regression to identify variables associated with attaining multiple positive health care quality indicators (when controlling for potential confounders).

KEY RESULTS

PREMs assessing factors relating to patient–provider communication (e.g., empathic provider care, shared decision-making) are mainly related to clinical indicators representing good chronic condition management, while those relating more broadly to health care in general (e.g., patient activation, chronic illness care) are mainly related to measures of appropriate health care use (e.g., preventive care screening receipt; potentially avoidable hospitalizations; unscheduled care, such as ER visits). When controlling for potential confounders, higher perceptions of the decision-making effectiveness component of SDM (β = 0.004, p = 0.03) and empathy and holistic care (β = 0.01, p = 0.02) showed a weak but positive relationship with attaining a greater number of positive health care quality indicators, while a weak but negative relationship emerged for perceptions of participation, respect for choices, and support (β = −0.003, p = 0.03) and overall VA experiences (β = −0.10, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

PREMs that measure PCC offer rich data about health care quality while engaging patients, and considering patient experiences and preferences, in performance assessment. PREMs may be used to supplement existing performance metrics.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (US). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine (US). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001.
4.
go back to reference Veterans Administration (VA) Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation (OPCC&CT). VA Patient Centered Care. Washington, DC: Veterans Administration Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation; 2014. Available at: http://www.va.gov/PATIENTCENTEREDCARE/about.asp . Accessed May 11, 2015. Veterans Administration (VA) Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation (OPCC&CT). VA Patient Centered Care. Washington, DC: Veterans Administration Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation; 2014. Available at: http://www.va.gov/PATIENTCENTEREDCARE/about.asp . Accessed May 11, 2015.
5.
go back to reference Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Blueprint for Excellence. Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration; 2014. Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Blueprint for Excellence. Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration; 2014.
6.
go back to reference Bechtel C, Ness DL. If you build it, will they come? Designing truly patient-centered health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):914–920.CrossRef Bechtel C, Ness DL. If you build it, will they come? Designing truly patient-centered health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):914–920.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(1):6–8.CrossRefPubMed Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(1):6–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):780–781.CrossRefPubMed Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):780–781.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gabbay RA, Bailit MH, Mauger DT, Wagner EH, Siminerio L. Multipayer patient-centered medical home implementation guided by the chronic care model. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011;37(6):265–273.PubMed Gabbay RA, Bailit MH, Mauger DT, Wagner EH, Siminerio L. Multipayer patient-centered medical home implementation guided by the chronic care model. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011;37(6):265–273.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Rosenthal MB, Abrams MK, Bitton A. The Patient-Centered Medical Home Evaluator’s Collaborative. Recommended Core Measures for Evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home: Cost, Utilization, and Clinical Quality. The Commonwealth Fund Data Brief. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012. Rosenthal MB, Abrams MK, Bitton A. The Patient-Centered Medical Home Evaluator’s Collaborative. Recommended Core Measures for Evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home: Cost, Utilization, and Clinical Quality. The Commonwealth Fund Data Brief. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012.
12.
go back to reference Friedberg MW, Schneider EC, Rosenthal MB, Volpp KG, Werner RM. Association between participation in a multipayer medical home intervention and changes in quality, utilization, and costs of care. JAMA. 2014;311(8):815–825.CrossRefPubMed Friedberg MW, Schneider EC, Rosenthal MB, Volpp KG, Werner RM. Association between participation in a multipayer medical home intervention and changes in quality, utilization, and costs of care. JAMA. 2014;311(8):815–825.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Grumbach K, Grundy P. Outcomes of Implementing Patient Centered Medical Home Interventions: A Review of the Evidence from Prospective Evaluation Studies in the United States. Washington, DC: Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative; 2010. Grumbach K, Grundy P. Outcomes of Implementing Patient Centered Medical Home Interventions: A Review of the Evidence from Prospective Evaluation Studies in the United States. Washington, DC: Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative; 2010.
14.
go back to reference Jackson GL, Powers BJ, Chatterjee R, et al. The patient-centered medical home: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):169–178.CrossRefPubMed Jackson GL, Powers BJ, Chatterjee R, et al. The patient-centered medical home: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):169–178.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Weldring T, Smith SMS. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights. 2013;6:61–68.PubMedPubMedCentral Weldring T, Smith SMS. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights. 2013;6:61–68.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: the Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2009. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: the Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2009.
18.
go back to reference Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 1):1918–1930.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 1):1918–1930.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, et al. The development of COMRADE—a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50(3):311–322.CrossRefPubMed Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, et al. The development of COMRADE—a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50(3):311–322.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mercer SW, Maxwell H, Heaney D, Watt GC. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004;21(6):699–705.CrossRefPubMed Mercer SW, Maxwell H, Heaney D, Watt GC. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004;21(6):699–705.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Greene SM. Development and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC). Med Care. 2005;43(5):436–444.CrossRefPubMed Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Greene SM. Development and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC). Med Care. 2005;43(5):436–444.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tackett S, Tad-y D, Rios R, Kisuule F, Wright S. Appraising the practice of etiquette-based medicine in the inpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(7):908–913.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tackett S, Tad-y D, Rios R, Kisuule F, Wright S. Appraising the practice of etiquette-based medicine in the inpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(7):908–913.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Jaén CR, Crabtree BF, Palmer R, et al. Methods for evaluating practice change toward a patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(Suppl 1):s9–s20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jaén CR, Crabtree BF, Palmer R, et al. Methods for evaluating practice change toward a patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(Suppl 1):s9–s20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, Stewart EE, et al. Effect of facilitation on practice outcomes in the National Demonstration Project model of the patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(Suppl 1):s33–s44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, Stewart EE, et al. Effect of facilitation on practice outcomes in the National Demonstration Project model of the patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(Suppl 1):s33–s44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1364–1379.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):1364–1379.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS. Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med. 2011;86(3):359–364.CrossRefPubMed Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS. Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med. 2011;86(3):359–364.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Street RL Jr, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295–301.CrossRefPubMed Street RL Jr, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295–301.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Bertakis KD, Azari R. Patient-centered care is associated with decreased health care utilization. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(3):229–239.CrossRefPubMed Bertakis KD, Azari R. Patient-centered care is associated with decreased health care utilization. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(3):229–239.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(5):520–526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(5):520–526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Fromer L. Implementing chronic care for COPD: planned visits, care coordination, and patient empowerment for improved outcomes. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:605–614.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fromer L. Implementing chronic care for COPD: planned visits, care coordination, and patient empowerment for improved outcomes. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;6:605–614.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Black N, Varaganum M, Hutchings A. Relationship between patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in elective surgery. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:534–542.CrossRefPubMed Black N, Varaganum M, Hutchings A. Relationship between patient reported experience (PREMs) and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in elective surgery. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:534–542.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Hostetter M, Klein S. Using Patient-Reported Outcomes to Improve Health Care Quality. In: Quality Matters: Innovations in Health Care Quality Improvement. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012. Hostetter M, Klein S. Using Patient-Reported Outcomes to Improve Health Care Quality. In: Quality Matters: Innovations in Health Care Quality Improvement. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012.
37.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10(Suppl 2):S125–S137.CrossRefPubMed Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10(Suppl 2):S125–S137.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Centers for Clinical Standards and Quality. National Impact Assessment of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Measures Report. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2015:2015. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Centers for Clinical Standards and Quality. National Impact Assessment of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Measures Report. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2015:2015.
39.
go back to reference LaVela SL, Gallan AS. Evaluation and measurement of patient experience. Patient Experience J. 2014;1(1):28–36. LaVela SL, Gallan AS. Evaluation and measurement of patient experience. Patient Experience J. 2014;1(1):28–36.
41.
go back to reference Alexander JA, Hearld LR, Mittler JN, Harvey J. Patient–physician role relationships and patient activation among individuals with chronic illness. Health Serv Res. 2012;47(3 Pt 1):1201–1223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alexander JA, Hearld LR, Mittler JN, Harvey J. Patient–physician role relationships and patient activation among individuals with chronic illness. Health Serv Res. 2012;47(3 Pt 1):1201–1223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Assessing the Associations of Patient-Reported Perceptions of Patient-Centered Care as Supplemental Measures of Health Care Quality in VA
Authors
Bella Etingen, MA
Scott Miskevics, BS
Sherri L. LaVela, PhD, MPH, MBA
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue Special Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3557-2

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2016

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine