Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1/2024

25-02-2023 | Research

Assessing reviews of academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons within the US on Healthgrades

Authors: Dani Stanbouly, Zacharie Rahhal, Austin Talis, Rami Stanbouly, Michael Baron, Kevin Arce, Srinivasa R. Chandra

Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the following study was to explore the patient feedback on academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) practicing in the United States (US) using the physician rating website (PRW) Healthgrades.com.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on academic OMSs in the US using data from Healthgrades.com. Predictor variables included OMS characteristics or rating characteristics. The primary outcome variable was overall rating. Linear regression was used to determine independent predictors of overall rating.

Results

The final study sample consisted of 309 academic OMSs (mean age, 56.4 years; males, 86.4%). Age group was significantly associated with overall rating (p = 0.034). Dual-degree OMSs had a higher mean overall rating than single-degree OMSs (4.26 vs. 3.98, p = 0.012). The number of ratings was also significantly associated with overall rating (p = 0.019). Upon controlling for all other variables, merely age group was independently associated with overall rating. Specifically, OMSs aged 41–55 years were associated with a higher overall rating (+0.96, p = 0.022) relative to OMSs aged >70 years.

Conclusions

The OPRs on Healthgrades.com for academic OMSs within the US are generally positive. Age was the only independent predictor for overall rating — younger OMSs (aged 41–55 years) were independently associated with a higher overall rating relative to older OMSs (aged >70 years). The new generation of younger OMSs is likely to be aware of PRWs and their implications in the growing world of online exposure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis MM (2014) Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA. 311(7):734–735CrossRefPubMed Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis MM (2014) Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA. 311(7):734–735CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Findlay SD (2016) Consumers’ interest in provider ratings grows, and improved report cards and other steps could accelerate their use. Health Aff (Millwood). 35(4):688–696CrossRefPubMed Findlay SD (2016) Consumers’ interest in provider ratings grows, and improved report cards and other steps could accelerate their use. Health Aff (Millwood). 35(4):688–696CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Carbonell G, Brand M (2018) Choosing a physician on social media: comments and ratings of users are more important than the qualification of a physician. Int J Hum-Comput Interact. 34(2):117–128CrossRef Carbonell G, Brand M (2018) Choosing a physician on social media: comments and ratings of users are more important than the qualification of a physician. Int J Hum-Comput Interact. 34(2):117–128CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lagu T, Hannon NS, Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK (2010) Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites. J Gen Intern Med. 25(9):942–946CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lagu T, Hannon NS, Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK (2010) Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites. J Gen Intern Med. 25(9):942–946CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Hong YA, Liang C, Radcliff TA, Wigfall LT, Street RL (2019) What do patients say about doctors online? a systematic review of studies on patient online reviews. J Med Internet Res. 21(4):e12521CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hong YA, Liang C, Radcliff TA, Wigfall LT, Street RL (2019) What do patients say about doctors online? a systematic review of studies on patient online reviews. J Med Internet Res. 21(4):e12521CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Lopez A, Detz A, Ratanawongsa N, Sarkar U (2012) What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 27(6):685–692CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lopez A, Detz A, Ratanawongsa N, Sarkar U (2012) What patients say about their doctors online: a qualitative content analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 27(6):685–692CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kadry B, Chu LF, Kadry B, Gammas D, Macario A (2011) Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating. J Med Internet Res. 13(4):e95CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kadry B, Chu LF, Kadry B, Gammas D, Macario A (2011) Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating. J Med Internet Res. 13(4):e95CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Prabhu AV, Randhawa S, Clump D, Heron DE, Beriwal S (2018) What do patients think about their radiation oncologists? An assessment of online patient reviews on Healthgrades. Cureus. 10(2):e2165PubMedPubMedCentral Prabhu AV, Randhawa S, Clump D, Heron DE, Beriwal S (2018) What do patients think about their radiation oncologists? An assessment of online patient reviews on Healthgrades. Cureus. 10(2):e2165PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Gilbert K, Hawkins CM, Hughes DR et al (2015) Physician rating websites: do radiologists have an online presence? J Am Coll Radiol. 12(8):867–871CrossRefPubMed Gilbert K, Hawkins CM, Hughes DR et al (2015) Physician rating websites: do radiologists have an online presence? J Am Coll Radiol. 12(8):867–871CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference McCormick JR, Patel MS, Hodakowski AJ et al (2021) Social media use by shoulder and elbow surgeons increases the number of ratings on physician review websites. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 30(12):e713–e723CrossRefPubMed McCormick JR, Patel MS, Hodakowski AJ et al (2021) Social media use by shoulder and elbow surgeons increases the number of ratings on physician review websites. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 30(12):e713–e723CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yu J, Samuel LT, Yalcin S, Sultan AA, Kamath AF (2020) Patient-recorded physician ratings: what can we learn from 11,527 online reviews of orthopedic surgeons? J Arthroplasty. 35(6S):S364–S367CrossRefPubMed Yu J, Samuel LT, Yalcin S, Sultan AA, Kamath AF (2020) Patient-recorded physician ratings: what can we learn from 11,527 online reviews of orthopedic surgeons? J Arthroplasty. 35(6S):S364–S367CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lewis P, Kobayashi E, Gupta S (2015) An online review of plastic surgeons in southern California. Ann Plast Surg. 74(Suppl 1):S66-70CrossRefPubMed Lewis P, Kobayashi E, Gupta S (2015) An online review of plastic surgeons in southern California. Ann Plast Surg. 74(Suppl 1):S66-70CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dorfman RG, Purnell C, Qiu C, Ellis MF, Basu CB, Kim JYS (2018) Happy and unhappy patients: a quantitative analysis of online plastic surgeon reviews for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 141(5):663e–673eCrossRefPubMed Dorfman RG, Purnell C, Qiu C, Ellis MF, Basu CB, Kim JYS (2018) Happy and unhappy patients: a quantitative analysis of online plastic surgeon reviews for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 141(5):663e–673eCrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Gupta A, Gupta R, White MD et al (2021) Patient satisfaction reviews for 967 spine neurosurgeons on Healthgrades. J Neurosurg Spine. 36(5):869–875 Gupta A, Gupta R, White MD et al (2021) Patient satisfaction reviews for 967 spine neurosurgeons on Healthgrades. J Neurosurg Spine. 36(5):869–875
17.
go back to reference Donnally CJ, McCormick JR, Li DJ et al (2018) How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons? J Neurosurg Spine. 30(2):279–288CrossRefPubMed Donnally CJ, McCormick JR, Li DJ et al (2018) How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons? J Neurosurg Spine. 30(2):279–288CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Basa K, Jabbour N, Rohlfing M et al (2021) Online reputations: comparing hospital- and patient-generated ratings in academic otolaryngology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 130(12):1317–1325CrossRefPubMed Basa K, Jabbour N, Rohlfing M et al (2021) Online reputations: comparing hospital- and patient-generated ratings in academic otolaryngology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 130(12):1317–1325CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sobin L, Goyal P (2014) Trends of online ratings of otolaryngologists: what do your patients really think of you? JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 140(7):635–638CrossRefPubMed Sobin L, Goyal P (2014) Trends of online ratings of otolaryngologists: what do your patients really think of you? JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 140(7):635–638CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lin Y, Hong YA, Henson BS et al (2020) Assessing patient experience and healthcare quality of dental care using patient online reviews in the United States: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res. 22(7):e18652CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin Y, Hong YA, Henson BS et al (2020) Assessing patient experience and healthcare quality of dental care using patient online reviews in the United States: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res. 22(7):e18652CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Susarla SM, Lopez J, Swanson EW et al (2015) Are quantitative measures of academic productivity correlated with academic rank in plastic surgery? A national study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 136(3):613–621CrossRefPubMed Susarla SM, Lopez J, Swanson EW et al (2015) Are quantitative measures of academic productivity correlated with academic rank in plastic surgery? A national study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 136(3):613–621CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Svider PF, Choudhry ZA, Choudhry OJ, Baredes S, Liu JK, Eloy JA (2013) The use of the h-index in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 123(1):103–106CrossRefPubMed Svider PF, Choudhry ZA, Choudhry OJ, Baredes S, Liu JK, Eloy JA (2013) The use of the h-index in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 123(1):103–106CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Svider PF, Pashkova AA, Choudhry Z et al (2013) Comparison of scholarly impact among surgical specialties: an examination of 2429 academic surgeons. Laryngoscope. 123(4):884–889CrossRefPubMed Svider PF, Pashkova AA, Choudhry Z et al (2013) Comparison of scholarly impact among surgical specialties: an examination of 2429 academic surgeons. Laryngoscope. 123(4):884–889CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference DeLuca LA Jr, St John A, Stolz U, Matheson L, Simpson A, Denninghoff KR (2013) The distribution of the h-index among academic emergency physicians in the United States. Acad Emerg Med. 20(10):997–1003CrossRefPubMed DeLuca LA Jr, St John A, Stolz U, Matheson L, Simpson A, Denninghoff KR (2013) The distribution of the h-index among academic emergency physicians in the United States. Acad Emerg Med. 20(10):997–1003CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lee J, Kraus KL, Couldwell WT (2009) Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 111(2):387–392CrossRefPubMed Lee J, Kraus KL, Couldwell WT (2009) Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 111(2):387–392CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Benway BM, Kalidas P, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB (2009) Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology? Urology. 74(1):30–33CrossRefPubMed Benway BM, Kalidas P, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB (2009) Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology? Urology. 74(1):30–33CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Rad AE, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2010) The H-index in academic radiology. Acad Radiol. 17(7):817–821CrossRefPubMed Rad AE, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2010) The H-index in academic radiology. Acad Radiol. 17(7):817–821CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Bakhsh W, Mesfin A (2014) Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 43(8):359–363PubMed Bakhsh W, Mesfin A (2014) Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 43(8):359–363PubMed
31.
go back to reference Prabhu AV, Kim C, De Guzman E et al (2017) Reputation management and content control: an analysis of radiation oncologists’ digital identities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 99(5):1083–1091CrossRefPubMed Prabhu AV, Kim C, De Guzman E et al (2017) Reputation management and content control: an analysis of radiation oncologists’ digital identities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 99(5):1083–1091CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Holliday AM, Kachalia A, Meyer GS, Sequist TD (2017) Physician and patient views on public physician rating websites: a cross-sectional study. J Gen Intern Med. 32(6):626–631CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Holliday AM, Kachalia A, Meyer GS, Sequist TD (2017) Physician and patient views on public physician rating websites: a cross-sectional study. J Gen Intern Med. 32(6):626–631CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick W, Abboudi J, Kim N et al (2017) An assessment of online reviews of hand surgeons. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 5(3):139–144PubMedPubMedCentral Kirkpatrick W, Abboudi J, Kim N et al (2017) An assessment of online reviews of hand surgeons. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 5(3):139–144PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Donate-Bartfield E, Lobb WK, Roucka TM (2014) Teaching culturally sensitive care to dental students: a multidisciplinary approach. J Dent Educ. 78(3):454–464CrossRefPubMed Donate-Bartfield E, Lobb WK, Roucka TM (2014) Teaching culturally sensitive care to dental students: a multidisciplinary approach. J Dent Educ. 78(3):454–464CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Grabner-Krauter S, Waiguny MK (2015) Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients’ decision making: randomized experiment. J Med Internet Res. 17(4):e93CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grabner-Krauter S, Waiguny MK (2015) Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients’ decision making: randomized experiment. J Med Internet Res. 17(4):e93CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Wang RY, Strong DM (2015) Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J Manag Inf Syst. 12(4):5–33CrossRef Wang RY, Strong DM (2015) Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J Manag Inf Syst. 12(4):5–33CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Trehan SK, Nguyen JT, Marx R et al (2018) Online patient ratings are not correlated with total knee replacement surgeon-specific outcomes. HSS J. 14(2):177–180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Trehan SK, Nguyen JT, Marx R et al (2018) Online patient ratings are not correlated with total knee replacement surgeon-specific outcomes. HSS J. 14(2):177–180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Metadata
Title
Assessing reviews of academic oral and maxillofacial surgeons within the US on Healthgrades
Authors
Dani Stanbouly
Zacharie Rahhal
Austin Talis
Rami Stanbouly
Michael Baron
Kevin Arce
Srinivasa R. Chandra
Publication date
25-02-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Electronic ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-023-01146-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1/2024 Go to the issue