Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Original Article

Assessing patients’ preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provider

Authors: Tanya P. Hoke, Alexander A. Berger, Christine C. Pan, Lindsey A. Jackson, William D. Winkelman, Rachel High, Katherine A. Volpe, Chee Paul Lin, Holly E. Richter

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Understanding patient preferences regarding provider characteristics is an under-explored area in urogynecology. This study aims to describe patient preferences for urogynecologic care, including provider gender, age, experience, and presence of medical trainees.

Methods

This was a multicenter, cross-sectional, survey-based study assessing patient preferences with a voluntary, self-administered, anonymous questionnaire prior to their first urogynecology consult. A 5-point Likert scale addressing provider gender, age, experience, and presence of trainees was used. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics and provider preferences. Chi-squared (or Fisher’s exact) test was used to test for associations.

Results

Six hundred fifteen women participated from eight sites including all geographic regions across the US; 70.8% identified as white with mean age of 58.5 ± 14.2 years. Urinary incontinence was the most commonly reported symptom (45.9%); 51.4% saw a female provider. The majority of patients saw a provider 45–60 years old (42.8%) with > 15 years’ experience (60.9%). Sixty-five percent of patients preferred a female provider; 10% preferred a male provider. Sixteen percent preferred a provider < 45 years old, 36% preferred 45–60 years old, and 11% of patients preferred a provider > 60 years old. Most patients preferred a provider with 5–15 or > 15 years’ experience (49% and 46%, respectively). Eleven percent preferred the presence of trainees while 24% preferred trainee absence.

Conclusion

Patient preferences regarding urogynecologic providers included female gender and provider age 45–60 years old with > 5 years’ experience. Further study is needed to identify qualitative components associated with these preferences.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rayburn WF, Liu CQ, Elwell EC, Rogers RG. Diversity of physician faculty in obstetrics and gynecology. J Reprod Med. 2016;61(1–2):22–6.PubMed Rayburn WF, Liu CQ, Elwell EC, Rogers RG. Diversity of physician faculty in obstetrics and gynecology. J Reprod Med. 2016;61(1–2):22–6.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Neubardt SB, moderator. Women’s liberation and the male gynecologist [roundtable]. Med Aspect Hum Sex 1974;8:158–199. Neubardt SB, moderator. Women’s liberation and the male gynecologist [roundtable]. Med Aspect Hum Sex 1974;8:158–199.
3.
go back to reference Jolliff L, Leadley J, Coakley E, Sloane RA. Women in US academic medicine and science: statistics and benchmarking report 2011–2012. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2012. Jolliff L, Leadley J, Coakley E, Sloane RA. Women in US academic medicine and science: statistics and benchmarking report 2011–2012. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2012.
4.
go back to reference Haar E, Halitsky V, Stricker G. Factors related to the preference for a female gynecologist. Med Care. 1975;13:782–90.CrossRefPubMed Haar E, Halitsky V, Stricker G. Factors related to the preference for a female gynecologist. Med Care. 1975;13:782–90.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Johnson AM, Schnatz PF, Kelsey AM, Ohannessian CM. Do women prefer care from female or male obstetrician–gynecologists? A study of patient gender preference. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005;105:369–79.PubMed Johnson AM, Schnatz PF, Kelsey AM, Ohannessian CM. Do women prefer care from female or male obstetrician–gynecologists? A study of patient gender preference. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005;105:369–79.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Plunkett BA, Kohli P, Milad MP. The importance of physician gender in the selection of an obstetrician or a gynecologist. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):926–8.CrossRefPubMed Plunkett BA, Kohli P, Milad MP. The importance of physician gender in the selection of an obstetrician or a gynecologist. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):926–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Huis Int’Veld EA, Canales FL, Furnas HJ. The impact of a plastic surgeon’s gender on patient choice. Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Apr 1;37(4):466–71. Huis Int’Veld EA, Canales FL, Furnas HJ. The impact of a plastic surgeon’s gender on patient choice. Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Apr 1;37(4):466–71.
9.
go back to reference Dusch MN, O’Sullivan PS, Ascher NL. Patient perceptions of female surgeons: how surgeon demeanor and type of surgery affect patient preference. J Surg Res. 2014 Mar;187(1):59–64.CrossRefPubMed Dusch MN, O’Sullivan PS, Ascher NL. Patient perceptions of female surgeons: how surgeon demeanor and type of surgery affect patient preference. J Surg Res. 2014 Mar;187(1):59–64.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Abghari MS, Takemoto R, Sadiq A, Karia R, Phillips D, Egol KA. Patient perceptions and preferences when choosing an orthopaedic surgeon. Iowa Orthop J. 2014;34:204–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Abghari MS, Takemoto R, Sadiq A, Karia R, Phillips D, Egol KA. Patient perceptions and preferences when choosing an orthopaedic surgeon. Iowa Orthop J. 2014;34:204–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Brueseke T, Muffly T, Rayburn W, Connolly A, Nieto M, De La Cruz J, et al. Workforce analysis of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, 2015 to 2045. Female Pelvic Med Reconst Surg. 2016;22:385–9.CrossRef Brueseke T, Muffly T, Rayburn W, Connolly A, Nieto M, De La Cruz J, et al. Workforce analysis of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, 2015 to 2045. Female Pelvic Med Reconst Surg. 2016;22:385–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference York NL, DaRosa DA, Markwell SJ, Niehaus AH, Folse R. Patients’ attitudes toward the involvement of medical students in their care. Am J Surg. 1995;169(4):421–3.CrossRefPubMed York NL, DaRosa DA, Markwell SJ, Niehaus AH, Folse R. Patients’ attitudes toward the involvement of medical students in their care. Am J Surg. 1995;169(4):421–3.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference O’Malley PG, Omori DM, Laudry FJ, Jackson J, Kroenke K. A prospective study to assess the effect of ambulatory teaching on patient satisfaction. Acad Med. 1997;72(11):1015–7.CrossRefPubMed O’Malley PG, Omori DM, Laudry FJ, Jackson J, Kroenke K. A prospective study to assess the effect of ambulatory teaching on patient satisfaction. Acad Med. 1997;72(11):1015–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Malcolm CE, Wong KK, Elwood-Martin R. Patients’ perceptions and experiences of family medicine residents in the office. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54(4):570–1.PubMedPubMedCentral Malcolm CE, Wong KK, Elwood-Martin R. Patients’ perceptions and experiences of family medicine residents in the office. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54(4):570–1.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Jiang X, Altomare C, Egan JF, Tocco DB, Schnatz PF. The ObGyn clerkship: are students denied the opportunity to provide patient care and what is the role of gender? Conn Med. 2012;76(4):231–6.PubMed Jiang X, Altomare C, Egan JF, Tocco DB, Schnatz PF. The ObGyn clerkship: are students denied the opportunity to provide patient care and what is the role of gender? Conn Med. 2012;76(4):231–6.PubMed
17.
go back to reference (2011) TF–IDF. In: Sammut C., Webb G.I. (eds) Encyclopedia of Machine Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. (2011) TF–IDF. In: Sammut C., Webb G.I. (eds) Encyclopedia of Machine Learning. Springer, Boston, MA.
18.
go back to reference Joachims T. A probabilistic analysis of the Rocchio algorithm with TFIDF for text categorization: DTIC document, 1996. Joachims T. A probabilistic analysis of the Rocchio algorithm with TFIDF for text categorization: DTIC document, 1996.
Metadata
Title
Assessing patients’ preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provider
Authors
Tanya P. Hoke
Alexander A. Berger
Christine C. Pan
Lindsey A. Jackson
William D. Winkelman
Rachel High
Katherine A. Volpe
Chee Paul Lin
Holly E. Richter
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04189-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2020 Go to the issue