Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 4/2023

Open Access 08-04-2022 | Artificial Intelligence | KNEE

Prediction of complications and surgery duration in primary TKA with high accuracy using machine learning with arthroplasty-specific data

Authors: Florian Hinterwimmer, Igor Lazic, Severin Langer, Christian Suren, Fiona Charitou, Michael T. Hirschmann, Georg Matziolis, Fritz Seidl, Florian Pohlig, Daniel Rueckert, Rainer Burgkart, Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 4/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The number of primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA) is expected to rise constantly. For patients and healthcare providers, the early identification of risk factors therefore becomes increasingly fundamental in the context of precision medicine. Others have already investigated the detection of risk factors by conducting literature reviews and applying conventional statistical methods. Since the prediction of events has been moderately accurate, a more comprehensive approach is needed. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have had ample success in many disciplines. However, these methods have not yet had a significant impact in orthopaedic research. The selection of a data source as well as the inclusion of relevant parameters is of utmost importance in this context. In this study, a standardized approach for ML in TKA to predict complications during surgery and an irregular surgery duration using data from two German arthroplasty-specific registries was evaluated.

Methods

The dataset is based on two initiatives of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery. A problem statement and initial parameters were defined. After screening, cleaning and preparation of these datasets, 864 cases of primary TKA (2016–2019) were gathered. The XGBoost algorithm was chosen and applied with a hyperparameter search, a cross validation and a loss weighting to cope with class imbalance. For final evaluation, several metrics (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC) were calculated.

Results

An accuracy of 92.0%, sensitivity of 34.8%, specificity of 95.8%, and AUC of 78.0% were achieved for predicting complications in primary TKA and 93.4%, 74.0%, 96.3%, and 91.6% for predicting irregular surgery duration, respectively. While traditional statistics (correlation coefficient) could not find any relevant correlation between any two parameters, the feature importance revealed several non-linear outcomes.

Conclusion

In this study, a feasible ML model to predict outcomes of primary TKA with very promising results was built. Complex correlations between parameters were detected, which could not be recognized by conventional statistical analysis. Arthroplasty-specific data were identified as relevant by the ML model and should be included in future clinical applications. Furthermore, an interdisciplinary interpretation as well as evaluation of the results by a data scientist and an orthopaedic surgeon are of paramount importance.

Level of evidence

Level IV.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arias-de la Torre J, Smith K, Dregan A, Valderas JM, Evans JP, Prieto-Alhambra D, Lozano L, Molina AJ, Martín V, Domingo L, Muñoz L, Espallargues M (2020) Impact of comorbidity on the short- and medium-term risk of revision in total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21:447CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arias-de la Torre J, Smith K, Dregan A, Valderas JM, Evans JP, Prieto-Alhambra D, Lozano L, Molina AJ, Martín V, Domingo L, Muñoz L, Espallargues M (2020) Impact of comorbidity on the short- and medium-term risk of revision in total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21:447CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Baker PN, Rushton S, Jameson SS, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan DJ (2013) Patient satisfaction with total knee replacement cannot be predicted from pre-operative variables alone: A cohort study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J 95-b:1359–1365 Baker PN, Rushton S, Jameson SS, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan DJ (2013) Patient satisfaction with total knee replacement cannot be predicted from pre-operative variables alone: A cohort study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J 95-b:1359–1365
4.
go back to reference Boyer B, Bordini B, Caputo D, Neri T, Stea S, Toni A (2019) What are the influencing factors on hip and knee arthroplasty survival? Prospective cohort study on 63619 arthroplasties. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:1251–1256CrossRefPubMed Boyer B, Bordini B, Caputo D, Neri T, Stea S, Toni A (2019) What are the influencing factors on hip and knee arthroplasty survival? Prospective cohort study on 63619 arthroplasties. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:1251–1256CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ (2010) The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:45–51CrossRefPubMed Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ (2010) The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:45–51CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Charette RS, Sloan M, DeAngelis RD, Lee GC (2019) Higher Rate of Early Revision Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Under Age 55: A Cautionary Tale. J Arthroplasty 34:2918–2924CrossRefPubMed Charette RS, Sloan M, DeAngelis RD, Lee GC (2019) Higher Rate of Early Revision Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Under Age 55: A Cautionary Tale. J Arthroplasty 34:2918–2924CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; San Francisco, California, USA. Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; San Francisco, California, USA.
8.
go back to reference Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement. BMC Med 13:1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM (2015) Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement. BMC Med 13:1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Delanois RE, Mistry JB, Gwam CU, Mohamed NS, Choksi US, Mont MA (2017) Current epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 32:2663–2668CrossRefPubMed Delanois RE, Mistry JB, Gwam CU, Mohamed NS, Choksi US, Mont MA (2017) Current epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 32:2663–2668CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Edelstein AI, Kwasny MJ, Suleiman LI, Khakhkhar RH, Moore MA, Beal MD, Manning DW (2015) Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-Day Complications After Knee and Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 30:5–10CrossRefPubMed Edelstein AI, Kwasny MJ, Suleiman LI, Khakhkhar RH, Moore MA, Beal MD, Manning DW (2015) Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-Day Complications After Knee and Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 30:5–10CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference El-Galaly A, Grazal C, Kappel A, Nielsen PT, Jensen SL, Forsberg JA (2020) Can machine-learning algorithms predict early revision TKA in the Danish knee arthroplasty registry? Clin Orthop Relat Res 478:2088–2101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral El-Galaly A, Grazal C, Kappel A, Nielsen PT, Jensen SL, Forsberg JA (2020) Can machine-learning algorithms predict early revision TKA in the Danish knee arthroplasty registry? Clin Orthop Relat Res 478:2088–2101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Fontana MA (2020) CORR Insights®: can machine-learning algorithms predict early revision TKA in the Danish knee arthroplasty registry? Clin Orthop Relat Res 478:2102–2104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fontana MA (2020) CORR Insights®: can machine-learning algorithms predict early revision TKA in the Danish knee arthroplasty registry? Clin Orthop Relat Res 478:2102–2104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Fontana MA, Lyman S, Sarker GK, Padgett DE, MacLean CH (2019) Can Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Which Patients Will Achieve Minimally Clinically Important Differences From Total Joint Arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 477:1267–1279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fontana MA, Lyman S, Sarker GK, Padgett DE, MacLean CH (2019) Can Machine Learning Algorithms Predict Which Patients Will Achieve Minimally Clinically Important Differences From Total Joint Arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 477:1267–1279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Harris AHS, Kuo AC, Bowe TR, Manfredi L, Lalani NF, Giori NJ (2021) Can machine learning methods produce accurate and easy-to-use preoperative prediction models of one-year improvements in pain and functioning after knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 36:112-117.e116CrossRefPubMed Harris AHS, Kuo AC, Bowe TR, Manfredi L, Lalani NF, Giori NJ (2021) Can machine learning methods produce accurate and easy-to-use preoperative prediction models of one-year improvements in pain and functioning after knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 36:112-117.e116CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jo C, Ko S, Shin WC, Han HS, Lee MC, Ko T, Ro DH (2020) Transfusion after total knee arthroplasty can be predicted using the machine learning algorithm. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:1757–1764CrossRefPubMed Jo C, Ko S, Shin WC, Han HS, Lee MC, Ko T, Ro DH (2020) Transfusion after total knee arthroplasty can be predicted using the machine learning algorithm. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:1757–1764CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Katakam A, Karhade AV, Schwab JH, Chen AF, Bedair HS (2020) Development and validation of machine learning algorithms for postoperative opioid prescriptions after TKA. J Orthop 22:95–99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Katakam A, Karhade AV, Schwab JH, Chen AF, Bedair HS (2020) Development and validation of machine learning algorithms for postoperative opioid prescriptions after TKA. J Orthop 22:95–99CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Klemt C, Laurencin S, Uzosike AC, Burns JC, Costales TG, Yeo I, Habibi Y, Kwon Y-M (2021) Machine learning models accurately predict recurrent infection following revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06794-3 Klemt C, Laurencin S, Uzosike AC, Burns JC, Costales TG, Yeo I, Habibi Y, Kwon Y-M (2021) Machine learning models accurately predict recurrent infection following revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00167-021-06794-3
18.
19.
go back to reference Kunze KN, Polce EM, Sadauskas AJ, Levine BR (2020) Development of machine learning algorithms to predict patient dissatisfaction after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 35:3117–3122CrossRefPubMed Kunze KN, Polce EM, Sadauskas AJ, Levine BR (2020) Development of machine learning algorithms to predict patient dissatisfaction after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 35:3117–3122CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ (2014) Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:624–630CrossRefPubMed Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ (2014) Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:624–630CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Li H, Jiao J, Zhang S, Tang H, Qu X, Yue B (2020) Construction and Comparison of Predictive Models for Length of Stay after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Regression Model and Machine Learning Analysis Based on 1826 Cases in a Single Singapore Center. J Knee Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710573 Li H, Jiao J, Zhang S, Tang H, Qu X, Yue B (2020) Construction and Comparison of Predictive Models for Length of Stay after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Regression Model and Machine Learning Analysis Based on 1826 Cases in a Single Singapore Center. J Knee Surg. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0040-1710573
22.
go back to reference Manning DW, Edelstein AI, Alvi HM (2016) Risk prediction tools for hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24:19–27CrossRefPubMed Manning DW, Edelstein AI, Alvi HM (2016) Risk prediction tools for hip and knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24:19–27CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Pitta M, Esposito CI, Li Z, Lee Y-y, Wright TM, Padgett DE (2018) Failure after modern total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study of 18,065 knees. J Arthroplasty 33:407–414CrossRefPubMed Pitta M, Esposito CI, Li Z, Lee Y-y, Wright TM, Padgett DE (2018) Failure after modern total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study of 18,065 knees. J Arthroplasty 33:407–414CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pua YH, Kang H, Thumboo J, Clark RA, Chew ES, Poon CL, Chong HC, Yeo SJ (2020) Machine learning methods are comparable to logistic regression techniques in predicting severe walking limitation following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:3207–3216CrossRefPubMed Pua YH, Kang H, Thumboo J, Clark RA, Chew ES, Poon CL, Chong HC, Yeo SJ (2020) Machine learning methods are comparable to logistic regression techniques in predicting severe walking limitation following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:3207–3216CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rassir R, Sierevelt IN, van Steenbergen LN, Nolte PA (2020) Is obesity associated with short-term revision after total knee arthroplasty? An analysis of 121,819 primary procedures from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Knee 27:1899–1906CrossRefPubMed Rassir R, Sierevelt IN, van Steenbergen LN, Nolte PA (2020) Is obesity associated with short-term revision after total knee arthroplasty? An analysis of 121,819 primary procedures from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Knee 27:1899–1906CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL Jr (2020) Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 35:S79-s85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL Jr (2020) Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 35:S79-s85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP (2018) Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:1455–1460CrossRefPubMed Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP (2018) Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:1455–1460CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiol 18:805–835CrossRef Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiol 18:805–835CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prediction of complications and surgery duration in primary TKA with high accuracy using machine learning with arthroplasty-specific data
Authors
Florian Hinterwimmer
Igor Lazic
Severin Langer
Christian Suren
Fiona Charitou
Michael T. Hirschmann
Georg Matziolis
Fritz Seidl
Florian Pohlig
Daniel Rueckert
Rainer Burgkart
Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe
Publication date
08-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-06957-w

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 4/2023 Go to the issue