Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Artificial Intelligence | Opinion

Building the case for actionable ethics in digital health research supported by artificial intelligence

Authors: Camille Nebeker, John Torous, Rebecca J. Bartlett Ellis

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The digital revolution is disrupting the ways in which health research is conducted, and subsequently, changing healthcare. Direct-to-consumer wellness products and mobile apps, pervasive sensor technologies and access to social network data offer exciting opportunities for researchers to passively observe and/or track patients ‘in the wild’ and 24/7. The volume of granular personal health data gathered using these technologies is unprecedented, and is increasingly leveraged to inform personalized health promotion and disease treatment interventions. The use of artificial intelligence in the health sector is also increasing. Although rich with potential, the digital health ecosystem presents new ethical challenges for those making decisions about the selection, testing, implementation and evaluation of technologies for use in healthcare. As the ‘Wild West’ of digital health research unfolds, it is important to recognize who is involved, and identify how each party can and should take responsibility to advance the ethical practices of this work. While not a comprehensive review, we describe the landscape, identify gaps to be addressed, and offer recommendations as to how stakeholders can and should take responsibility to advance socially responsible digital health research.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Herrmann M, Boehme P, Mondritzki T, Ehlers JP, Kavadias S, Truebel H. Digital transformation and disruption of the health care sector: internet-based observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e104.CrossRef Herrmann M, Boehme P, Mondritzki T, Ehlers JP, Kavadias S, Truebel H. Digital transformation and disruption of the health care sector: internet-based observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e104.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lupton D. The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36(6):856–69.CrossRef Lupton D. The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36(6):856–69.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boyd D, Crawford K. Critical questions for big data. Inform Commun Soc. 2012;15(5):662–79.CrossRef Boyd D, Crawford K. Critical questions for big data. Inform Commun Soc. 2012;15(5):662–79.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lupton D. Self-tracking, health and medicine. Health Sociol Rev. 2017;26(1):1–5.CrossRef Lupton D. Self-tracking, health and medicine. Health Sociol Rev. 2017;26(1):1–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Arigo D, Jake-Schoffman DE, Wolin K, Beckjord E, Hekler EB, Pagoto SL. The history and future of digital health in the field of behavioral medicine. J Behav Med. 2019;42(1):67–83.CrossRef Arigo D, Jake-Schoffman DE, Wolin K, Beckjord E, Hekler EB, Pagoto SL. The history and future of digital health in the field of behavioral medicine. J Behav Med. 2019;42(1):67–83.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(4):230–43.CrossRef Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(4):230–43.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nebeker C, Harlow J, Giacinto-Espinoza R, Linares-Orozco R, Bloss C, Weibel N. Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives. Am J Bioeth Empir Bioeth AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017;8(4):266–76.CrossRef Nebeker C, Harlow J, Giacinto-Espinoza R, Linares-Orozco R, Bloss C, Weibel N. Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives. Am J Bioeth Empir Bioeth AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017;8(4):266–76.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kluge EH. Health information, the fair information principles and ethics. Methods Inf Med. 1994;33(04):336–45.CrossRef Kluge EH. Health information, the fair information principles and ethics. Methods Inf Med. 1994;33(04):336–45.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pimple KD. Emerging pervasive information and communication tTechnologies (PICT): ethical challenges, opportunities and safeguards. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2013. Pimple KD. Emerging pervasive information and communication tTechnologies (PICT): ethical challenges, opportunities and safeguards. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2013.
15.
go back to reference Vitak J, Proferes N, Shilton K, Ashktorab Z. Ethics regulation in social computing research: examining the role of institutional review boards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017;12(5):372–82.CrossRef Vitak J, Proferes N, Shilton K, Ashktorab Z. Ethics regulation in social computing research: examining the role of institutional review boards. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017;12(5):372–82.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Van Velthoven MH, Smith J, Wells G, Brindley D. Digital health app development standards: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e022969.CrossRef Van Velthoven MH, Smith J, Wells G, Brindley D. Digital health app development standards: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e022969.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Barnett I, Torous J. Ethics, transparency, and public health at the intersection of innovation and Facebook’s suicide prevention efforts. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(8):565.CrossRef Barnett I, Torous J. Ethics, transparency, and public health at the intersection of innovation and Facebook’s suicide prevention efforts. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(8):565.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bloss C, Nebeker C, Bietz M, Bae D, Bigby B, Devereaux M, et al. Reimagining human research protections for 21st century science. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(12):e329.CrossRef Bloss C, Nebeker C, Bietz M, Bae D, Bigby B, Devereaux M, et al. Reimagining human research protections for 21st century science. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(12):e329.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pagoto S, Nebeker C. How scientists can take the lead in establishing ethical practices for social media research. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2019;26(4):311–3.CrossRef Pagoto S, Nebeker C. How scientists can take the lead in establishing ethical practices for social media research. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2019;26(4):311–3.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Adibuzzaman M, DeLaurentis P, Hill J, Benneyworth BD. Big data in healthcare – the promises, challenges and opportunities from a research perspective: a case study with a model database. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018;2017:384–92.PubMedPubMedCentral Adibuzzaman M, DeLaurentis P, Hill J, Benneyworth BD. Big data in healthcare – the promises, challenges and opportunities from a research perspective: a case study with a model database. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018;2017:384–92.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Building the case for actionable ethics in digital health research supported by artificial intelligence
Authors
Camille Nebeker
John Torous
Rebecca J. Bartlett Ellis
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1377-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Medicine 1/2019 Go to the issue