Published in:
08-09-2023 | Artificial Intelligence | Short Communication
Assessing the accuracy of ChatGPT references in head and neck and ENT disciplines
Authors:
Andrea Frosolini, Leonardo Franz, Simone Benedetti, Luigi Angelo Vaira, Cosimo de Filippis, Paolo Gennaro, Gino Marioni, Guido Gabriele
Published in:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
|
Issue 11/2023
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
ChatGPT has gained popularity as a web application since its release in 2022. While artificial intelligence (AI) systems’ potential in scientific writing is widely discussed, their reliability in reviewing literature and providing accurate references remains unexplored. This study examines the reliability of references generated by ChatGPT language models in the Head and Neck field.
Methods
Twenty clinical questions were generated across different Head and Neck disciplines, to prompt ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0 to produce texts on the assigned topics. The generated references were categorized as “true,” “erroneous,” or “inexistent” based on congruence with existing records in scientific databases.
Results
ChatGPT 4.0 outperformed version 3.5 in terms of reference reliability. However, both versions displayed a tendency to provide erroneous/non-existent references.
Conclusions
It is crucial to address this challenge to maintain the reliability of scientific literature. Journals and institutions should establish strategies and good-practice principles in the evolving landscape of AI-assisted scientific writing.