Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2021

01-12-2021 | Original Research

Artifact reduction by using alternating polarity stimulus pairs in intraoperative peripheral nerve action potential recording

Authors: Gang Wu, Allan Belzberg, Jessica Nance, Sergio Gutierrez-Hernandez, Eva K. Ritzl, Matthias Ringkamp

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Intraoperative nerve action potential (NAP) recording permits direct study of an injured nerve for functional assessment of lesions in continuity. Stimulus artifact contamination often hampers NAP recording and interferes with its interpretation. In the present study, we evaluated the artifact reduction method using alternating polarity in peripheral nerve recording. Our study was conducted under controlled conditions in laboratory animals. NAPs were recorded from surgically exposed median or ulnar nerves. For the artifact reduction method with alternating polarity, two sequential recordings, one with normal and one with reversed stimulus polarity, were acquired and the signals from this recording pair were averaged. Simulation was also performed to further evaluate the effects of alternating polarity on the waveforms. The results are as follows: First, we found that this method worked for recordings with unsaturated electrical stimulus artifacts. Second, slightly unequal latencies occurred in an NAP pair, and this inequality contributed to a minimal loss of NAP amplitudes when averaging the two recordings. Third, perfect artifact cancelation and minimal signal loss were also demonstrated by simulation. Finally, we applied the method during nerve inching and demonstrated its usefulness in intraoperative NAP recordings as the method made the recording more resilient to short conduction distances. Thus, our findings demonstrate that this artifact reduction method can be used as a supplemental tool together with our previously described bridge grounding technique or the nonlifting nerve recording configuration to further improve intraoperative peripheral nerve recording. The method can be applied in clinical settings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Simon NG, Spinner RJ, Kline DG, Kliot M. Advances in the neurological and neurosurgical management of peripheral nerve trauma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2016;87:198–208.CrossRef Simon NG, Spinner RJ, Kline DG, Kliot M. Advances in the neurological and neurosurgical management of peripheral nerve trauma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2016;87:198–208.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Crum BA, Strommen JA. Peripheral nerve stimulation and monitoring during operative procedures. Muscle Nerve. 2007;35:159–70.CrossRef Crum BA, Strommen JA. Peripheral nerve stimulation and monitoring during operative procedures. Muscle Nerve. 2007;35:159–70.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kline DG, Hackett ER, May PR. Evaluation of nerve injuries by evoked potentials and electromyography. J Neurosurg. 1969;31:128–36.CrossRef Kline DG, Hackett ER, May PR. Evaluation of nerve injuries by evoked potentials and electromyography. J Neurosurg. 1969;31:128–36.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kline DG, Happel LT, Lecture P. A quarter century’s experience with intraoperative nerve action potential recording. Can J Neurol Sci. 1993;20:3–10.CrossRef Kline DG, Happel LT, Lecture P. A quarter century’s experience with intraoperative nerve action potential recording. Can J Neurol Sci. 1993;20:3–10.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nair DG. Intraoperative mapping of roots, plexuses, and nerves. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;30:613–9.CrossRef Nair DG. Intraoperative mapping of roots, plexuses, and nerves. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;30:613–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Oberle JW, Antoniadis G, Rath SA, Richter HP. Value of nerve action potentials in the surgical management of traumatic nerve lesions. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:1337–42.CrossRef Oberle JW, Antoniadis G, Rath SA, Richter HP. Value of nerve action potentials in the surgical management of traumatic nerve lesions. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:1337–42.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Robert EG, Happel LT, Kline DG. Intraoperative nerve action potential recordings: technical considerations, problems, and pitfalls. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:A97-104.CrossRef Robert EG, Happel LT, Kline DG. Intraoperative nerve action potential recordings: technical considerations, problems, and pitfalls. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:A97-104.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wu G, Belzberg A, Nance J, Gutierrez-Hernandez S, Ritzl EK, Ringkamp M. Solutions to the technical challenges embedded in the current methods for intraoperative peripheral nerve action potential recordings. J Neurosurg. 2019; 1-10. Wu G, Belzberg A, Nance J, Gutierrez-Hernandez S, Ritzl EK, Ringkamp M. Solutions to the technical challenges embedded in the current methods for intraoperative peripheral nerve action potential recordings. J Neurosurg. 2019; 1-10.
9.
go back to reference Krarup C, Loeb GE, Pezeshkpour GH. Conduction studies in peripheral cat nerve using implanted electrodes: II. The effects of prolonged constriction on regeneration of crushed nerve fibers. Muscle Nerve. 1988;11:933–44.CrossRef Krarup C, Loeb GE, Pezeshkpour GH. Conduction studies in peripheral cat nerve using implanted electrodes: II. The effects of prolonged constriction on regeneration of crushed nerve fibers. Muscle Nerve. 1988;11:933–44.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Morita G, Tu YX, Okajima Y, Honda S, Tomita Y. Estimation of the conduction velocity distribution of human sensory nerve fibers. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002;12:37–43.CrossRef Morita G, Tu YX, Okajima Y, Honda S, Tomita Y. Estimation of the conduction velocity distribution of human sensory nerve fibers. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002;12:37–43.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Parker JL, Shariati NH, Karantonis DM. Electrically evoked compound action potential recording in peripheral nerves. Bioelectron Med. 2018;1:71–83.CrossRef Parker JL, Shariati NH, Karantonis DM. Electrically evoked compound action potential recording in peripheral nerves. Bioelectron Med. 2018;1:71–83.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Spinner RJ, Kline DG. Surgery for peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries or other nerve lesions. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23:680–95.CrossRef Spinner RJ, Kline DG. Surgery for peripheral nerve and brachial plexus injuries or other nerve lesions. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23:680–95.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hughes ML, Goehring JL, Baudhuin JL. Effects of stimulus polarity and artifact reduction method on the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear. 2017;38:332–43.CrossRef Hughes ML, Goehring JL, Baudhuin JL. Effects of stimulus polarity and artifact reduction method on the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear. 2017;38:332–43.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Caress JB. Technical, physiological and anatomic considerations in nerve conduction studies. In: Blum AS, Rutkove SB, eds. The Clinical Neurophysiology Primer. Humana Press, 2007; 217-27. Caress JB. Technical, physiological and anatomic considerations in nerve conduction studies. In: Blum AS, Rutkove SB, eds. The Clinical Neurophysiology Primer. Humana Press, 2007; 217-27.
15.
go back to reference Li Y, Lao J, Zhao X, Tian D, Zhu Y, Wei X. The optimal distance between two electrode tips during recording of compound nerve action potentials in the rat median nerve. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9:171–8.CrossRef Li Y, Lao J, Zhao X, Tian D, Zhu Y, Wei X. The optimal distance between two electrode tips during recording of compound nerve action potentials in the rat median nerve. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9:171–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lopez J. Peripheral nerve monitoring. In: Galloway G, Nuwer M, Lopez J, Zamel K, editors. Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 142–62.CrossRef Lopez J. Peripheral nerve monitoring. In: Galloway G, Nuwer M, Lopez J, Zamel K, editors. Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 142–62.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pei YC, Chen TY, Hsu PC, Lin CH, Huang JJ. An electroneurography-based assay for identifying injured nerve segment during surgery: design and in vivo application in the rat. J Neural Eng. 2019;16:026027.CrossRef Pei YC, Chen TY, Hsu PC, Lin CH, Huang JJ. An electroneurography-based assay for identifying injured nerve segment during surgery: design and in vivo application in the rat. J Neural Eng. 2019;16:026027.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Saponaro-Gonzalez A, Perez-Lorensu PJ. Novel approach to continuous neurophysiological monitoring during surgery of peripheral nerve tumors. Surg Neurol Int. 2017;8:184.CrossRef Saponaro-Gonzalez A, Perez-Lorensu PJ. Novel approach to continuous neurophysiological monitoring during surgery of peripheral nerve tumors. Surg Neurol Int. 2017;8:184.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kline DG, Happel L. Obstetric brachial plexus lesions. J Neurosurg. 2010;112:693–5.CrossRef Kline DG, Happel L. Obstetric brachial plexus lesions. J Neurosurg. 2010;112:693–5.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Malessy MJ, Pondaag W, van Dijk JG. Electromyography, nerve action potential, and compound motor action potentials in obstetric brachial plexus lesions: validation in the absence of a “gold standard.” Neurosurgery. 2009;65:A153–9.CrossRef Malessy MJ, Pondaag W, van Dijk JG. Electromyography, nerve action potential, and compound motor action potentials in obstetric brachial plexus lesions: validation in the absence of a “gold standard.” Neurosurgery. 2009;65:A153–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pondaag W, van Someren PJ, van Dijk JG, Malessy MJ. Intraoperative nerve action and compound motor action potential recordings in patients with obstetric brachial plexus lesions. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:946–54.CrossRef Pondaag W, van Someren PJ, van Dijk JG, Malessy MJ. Intraoperative nerve action and compound motor action potential recordings in patients with obstetric brachial plexus lesions. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:946–54.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Artifact reduction by using alternating polarity stimulus pairs in intraoperative peripheral nerve action potential recording
Authors
Gang Wu
Allan Belzberg
Jessica Nance
Sergio Gutierrez-Hernandez
Eva K. Ritzl
Matthias Ringkamp
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00613-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2021 Go to the issue