Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Women’s perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey

Authors: Frankie J. Fair, Helen Watson, Rachel Gardner, Hora Soltani

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The practice of antenatal breast expression (ABE) has been proposed as a strategy to promote successful breastfeeding. Although there has been some focus on the evaluation of the effects of ABE in promotion of breastfeeding, little or no evidence exists on women’s experiences of ABE or opinions on ABE, particularly amongst overweight or obese women.

Methods

This study aimed to explore women’s knowledge, practices and opinions of ABE, and any differences within the overweight and obese subgroups. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken using an online questionnaire distributed by a maternity user group representative via social media. Quantitative data were analysed using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests in SPSS. Simple thematic analysis was used for the qualitative data.

Results

A total of 688 responses were analysed; the sample represented a group of breastfeeding mothers, of whom 64.5% had heard of ABE, 8.2% had been advised to do ABE, and 14.2% had undertaken ABE. Of the women who had been advised to do ABE, 67.9% had complied. Most participants (58.6%) were unsure if ABE was a good idea; however 80.9% would consider doing ABE if it was found to be helpful to prepare for breastfeeding. Women in the overweight or obese subgroups were significantly more likely to have heard of ABE (p < 0.001), and positive opinion of ABE also increased with higher BMI groups. The qualitative data demonstrated participants felt ABE may be beneficial when mother or baby have medical problems, and in preparation for breastfeeding, but highlighted their concerns that it may interfere with nature and be harmful, and that they wanted more information and knowledge about ABE.

Conclusions

Amongst women who have breastfed, many have heard of ABE, compliance with advice to undertake ABE is relatively high, and ABE is considered an acceptable practice. Further investigation into the benefits and safety of ABE is warranted, to address the needs of childbearing women for evidence-based information about this practice. If the evidence base is established, overweight and obese pregnant women could be an important target group for this intervention.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Eidelman AI, Schanler RJ, Johnston M, et al. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e827–41.CrossRef Eidelman AI, Schanler RJ, Johnston M, et al. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e827–41.CrossRef
7.
19.
go back to reference Chapman DJ, Perez-Escamilla R. Maternal perception of the onset of lactation is a valid, public health indicator of lactogenesis stage II. J Nutr. 2000;130:2972–80.CrossRefPubMed Chapman DJ, Perez-Escamilla R. Maternal perception of the onset of lactation is a valid, public health indicator of lactogenesis stage II. J Nutr. 2000;130:2972–80.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Neville MC, Morton J. Physiology and endocrine changes underlying human lactogenesis II. J Nutr. 2001;131:3005S–8S.CrossRefPubMed Neville MC, Morton J. Physiology and endocrine changes underlying human lactogenesis II. J Nutr. 2001;131:3005S–8S.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hartmann P, Cregan M. Lactogenesis and the effects of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and prematurity. J Nutr. 2001;131:3016S–20S.CrossRefPubMed Hartmann P, Cregan M. Lactogenesis and the effects of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and prematurity. J Nutr. 2001;131:3016S–20S.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Marchi J, Berg M, Dencker A, Olander EK, Begley C. Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews. Obes Rev. 2015;16:621–38.CrossRefPubMed Marchi J, Berg M, Dencker A, Olander EK, Begley C. Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews. Obes Rev. 2015;16:621–38.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Rasmussen KM, Kjolhede CL. Prepregnant overweight and obesity diminish the prolactin response to suckling in the first week postpartum. Pediatrics. 2004;113:e465–71.CrossRefPubMed Rasmussen KM, Kjolhede CL. Prepregnant overweight and obesity diminish the prolactin response to suckling in the first week postpartum. Pediatrics. 2004;113:e465–71.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference West D, Marasco L. Getting your milk supply off to a good start. The breastfeeding mother’s guide to making more milk. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009. West D, Marasco L. Getting your milk supply off to a good start. The breastfeeding mother’s guide to making more milk. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
27.
go back to reference East CE, Dolan WJ, Forster DA. Antenatal breast milk expression by women with diabetes for improving infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD010408. East CE, Dolan WJ, Forster DA. Antenatal breast milk expression by women with diabetes for improving infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD010408.
28.
go back to reference Cox SG. Expressing and storing colostrum antenatally for use in the newborn period. Breastfeed Rev. 2006;143:11–6. Cox SG. Expressing and storing colostrum antenatally for use in the newborn period. Breastfeed Rev. 2006;143:11–6.
29.
go back to reference Britain LLLG. Antenatal expression of colostrum. Information sheet no. 2811. Nottingham, Great Britain: LaLeche League Great Britain; 2010. Britain LLLG. Antenatal expression of colostrum. Information sheet no. 2811. Nottingham, Great Britain: LaLeche League Great Britain; 2010.
33.
go back to reference Derby Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Antenatal hand expression of colostrum, draft guideline. Derby: Derby Hosital; 2007. Derby Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Antenatal hand expression of colostrum, draft guideline. Derby: Derby Hosital; 2007.
44.
go back to reference Pathak S. Practice of antenatal breast expression in National Health Service in England. Int J Health Res Medico Legal Pract. 2017;3:12–4. Pathak S. Practice of antenatal breast expression in National Health Service in England. Int J Health Res Medico Legal Pract. 2017;3:12–4.
46.
go back to reference Forster DA, McEgan K, Ford R, Moorhead A, Opie G, Walker S, et al. Diabetes and antenatal milk expressing: a pilot project to inform the development of a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery. 2011;27:209–14.CrossRefPubMed Forster DA, McEgan K, Ford R, Moorhead A, Opie G, Walker S, et al. Diabetes and antenatal milk expressing: a pilot project to inform the development of a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery. 2011;27:209–14.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Forster DA, Moorhead AM, Jacobs SE, et al. Advising women with diabetes in pregnancy to express breastmilk in late pregnancy (diabetes and antenatal milk expressing [DAME]): a multicentre, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2204–13.CrossRefPubMed Forster DA, Moorhead AM, Jacobs SE, et al. Advising women with diabetes in pregnancy to express breastmilk in late pregnancy (diabetes and antenatal milk expressing [DAME]): a multicentre, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2204–13.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Women’s perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey
Authors
Frankie J. Fair
Helen Watson
Rachel Gardner
Hora Soltani
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0497-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Reproductive Health 1/2018 Go to the issue