Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Assessing utility values for treatment-related health states of acute myeloid leukemia in the United States

Authors: Eytan M. Stein, Min Yang, Annie Guerin, Wei Gao, Philip Galebach, Cheryl Q. Xiang, Subrata Bhattacharyya, Gaetano Bonifacio, George J. Joseph

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Preference valuations of health status are essential in health technology and economic appraisal. This study estimated utilities for treatment-related health states of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and disutilities of severe adverse events (SAEs) using a representative sample of adults from the general population in the United States (US).

Methods

Treatment-related AML health states, defined based on literature and interviews with clinicians, included complete remission (CR), no CR, relapse, stem cell transplant (SCT), and post SCT short-term recovery. Six attributes with varying levels, including fever, lack of energy, problems with daily function, anxiety/depression, blood transfusions, and hospitalization, were used to define health states. An online survey using discrete choice experiment methodology was designed to capture preferences for health status scenarios including the identified attributes and key grade 3/4 chemotherapy-related SAEs. Health state utilities and SAE disutilities were generated from a conditional logistic regression with generalized estimating equations.

Results

Of the 300 survey participants, the demographic distributions were within a 3% margin of those in the 2010 US Census. CR had the highest utility value (0.875), followed by post-SCT short-term recovery (0.398), relapse (0.355), no CR (0.262), and SCT (0.158). Of the SAEs, serious infection had the highest decline in utility (0.218), followed by severe diarrhea (0.176), abnormally low blood cell counts (0.100), and severe redness/skin peeling (0.060).

Conclusions

AML and treatments can result in reduced quality of life and impaired ability to perform daily activities. Findings of this study underline the value that society places on treatment-related AML health states and SAEs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Deschler B, Lubbert M. Acute myeloid leukemia: epidemiology and etiology. Cancer. 2006;107(9):2099–107.CrossRef Deschler B, Lubbert M. Acute myeloid leukemia: epidemiology and etiology. Cancer. 2006;107(9):2099–107.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Redaelli A, Stephens JM, Brandt S, Botteman MF, Pashos CL. Short- and long-term effects of acute myeloid leukemia on patient health-related quality of life. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30(1):103–17.CrossRef Redaelli A, Stephens JM, Brandt S, Botteman MF, Pashos CL. Short- and long-term effects of acute myeloid leukemia on patient health-related quality of life. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30(1):103–17.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Oliva EN, Nobile F, Alimena G, Ronco F, Specchia G, Impera S, et al. Quality of life in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: patients may be more accurate than physicians. Haematologica. 2011;96(5):696–702.CrossRef Oliva EN, Nobile F, Alimena G, Ronco F, Specchia G, Impera S, et al. Quality of life in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: patients may be more accurate than physicians. Haematologica. 2011;96(5):696–702.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Szer J. The prevalent predicament of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012;2012:43–8.PubMed Szer J. The prevalent predicament of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012;2012:43–8.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Preisler HD, Anderson K, Rai K, Cuttner J, Yates J, DuPre E, et al. The frequency of long-term remission in patients with acute myelogenous leukaemia treated with conventional maintenance chemotherapy: a study of 760 patients with a minimal follow-up time of 6 years. Br J Haematol. 1989;71(2):189–94.CrossRef Preisler HD, Anderson K, Rai K, Cuttner J, Yates J, DuPre E, et al. The frequency of long-term remission in patients with acute myelogenous leukaemia treated with conventional maintenance chemotherapy: a study of 760 patients with a minimal follow-up time of 6 years. Br J Haematol. 1989;71(2):189–94.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pidala J, Anasetti C, Jim H. Quality of life after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2009;114(1):7–19.CrossRef Pidala J, Anasetti C, Jim H. Quality of life after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2009;114(1):7–19.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference El-Jawahri A, LeBlanc T, VanDusen H, Traeger L, Greer JA, Pirl WF, et al. Effect of inpatient palliative care on quality of life 2 weeks after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(20):2094–103.CrossRef El-Jawahri A, LeBlanc T, VanDusen H, Traeger L, Greer JA, Pirl WF, et al. Effect of inpatient palliative care on quality of life 2 weeks after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(20):2094–103.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Blinman P, King M, Norman R, Viney R, Stockler MR. Preferences for cancer treatments: an overview of methods and applications in oncology. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(5):1104–10.CrossRef Blinman P, King M, Norman R, Viney R, Stockler MR. Preferences for cancer treatments: an overview of methods and applications in oncology. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(5):1104–10.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Forsythe A, Brandt PS, Dolph M, Patel S, Rabe APJ, Tremblay G. Systematic review of health state utility values for acute myeloid leukemia. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;10:83–92.CrossRef Forsythe A, Brandt PS, Dolph M, Patel S, Rabe APJ, Tremblay G. Systematic review of health state utility values for acute myeloid leukemia. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018;10:83–92.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Johnson FRLE, Marshall D, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health. 2013;2013(16):3–13.CrossRef Johnson FRLE, Marshall D, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health. 2013;2013(16):3–13.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.CrossRef Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Xie F, Pickard AS, Krabbe PF, Revicki D, Viney R, Devlin N, et al. A checklist for reporting valuation studies of multi-attribute utility-based instruments (CREATE). PharmacoEconomics. 2015;33(8):867–77.CrossRef Xie F, Pickard AS, Krabbe PF, Revicki D, Viney R, Devlin N, et al. A checklist for reporting valuation studies of multi-attribute utility-based instruments (CREATE). PharmacoEconomics. 2015;33(8):867–77.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bansback N, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Anis A. Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values. J Health Econ. 2012;31(1):306–18.CrossRef Bansback N, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Anis A. Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values. J Health Econ. 2012;31(1):306–18.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bansback N, Hole AR, Mulhern B, Tsuchiya A. Testing a discrete choice experiment including duration to value health states for large descriptive systems: addressing design and sampling issues. Soc Sci Med. 2014;114:38–48.CrossRef Bansback N, Hole AR, Mulhern B, Tsuchiya A. Testing a discrete choice experiment including duration to value health states for large descriptive systems: addressing design and sampling issues. Soc Sci Med. 2014;114:38–48.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Viney R, Norman R, Brazier J, Cronin P, King MT, Ratcliffe J, et al. An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states. Health Econ. 2014;23(6):729–42.CrossRef Viney R, Norman R, Brazier J, Cronin P, King MT, Ratcliffe J, et al. An Australian discrete choice experiment to value eq-5d health states. Health Econ. 2014;23(6):729–42.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gu Y, Norman R, Viney R. Estimating health state utility values from discrete choice experiments--a QALY space model approach. Health Econ. 2014;23(9):1098–114.CrossRef Gu Y, Norman R, Viney R. Estimating health state utility values from discrete choice experiments--a QALY space model approach. Health Econ. 2014;23(9):1098–114.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Orme B. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison, WI: Research Publishers LLC; 2006. Orme B. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison, WI: Research Publishers LLC; 2006.
25.
go back to reference Cheng J, Pullenayegum E, Marshall DA, Marshall JK, Thabane L. An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:15.CrossRef Cheng J, Pullenayegum E, Marshall DA, Marshall JK, Thabane L. An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:15.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hauber AB, Gonzalez JM, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Prior T, Marshall DA, Cunningham C, et al. Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good research practices task force. Value Health. 2016;19(4):300–15.CrossRef Hauber AB, Gonzalez JM, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Prior T, Marshall DA, Cunningham C, et al. Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good research practices task force. Value Health. 2016;19(4):300–15.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Pan W. Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics. 2001;57(1):120–5.CrossRef Pan W. Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics. 2001;57(1):120–5.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Buckley SA, Lee SJ, Walter RB. Measuring quality of life in acute myeloid leukemia: limitations and future directions. Expert Rev Hematol. 2016;9(9):821–3.CrossRef Buckley SA, Lee SJ, Walter RB. Measuring quality of life in acute myeloid leukemia: limitations and future directions. Expert Rev Hematol. 2016;9(9):821–3.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wu J, Han Y, Zhao FL, Zhou J, Chen Z, Sun H. Validation and comparison of EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) among stable angina patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:156.CrossRef Wu J, Han Y, Zhao FL, Zhou J, Chen Z, Sun H. Validation and comparison of EuroQoL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) among stable angina patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:156.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cunillera O, Tresserras R, Rajmil L, Vilagut G, Brugulat P, Herdman M, et al. Discriminative capacity of the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 as measures of health status in population health survey. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(6):853–64.CrossRef Cunillera O, Tresserras R, Rajmil L, Vilagut G, Brugulat P, Herdman M, et al. Discriminative capacity of the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 as measures of health status in population health survey. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(6):853–64.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bharmal M, Thomas J 3rd. Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population. Value Health. 2006;9(4):262–71.CrossRef Bharmal M, Thomas J 3rd. Comparing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D descriptive systems to assess their ceiling effects in the US general population. Value Health. 2006;9(4):262–71.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Aristides M, Barlev A, Barber B, Gijsen M, Quinn C. Population preference values for health states in relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the United Kingdom. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:181.CrossRef Aristides M, Barlev A, Barber B, Gijsen M, Quinn C. Population preference values for health states in relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the United Kingdom. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:181.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Beusterien KM, Davies J, Leach M, Meiklejohn D, Grinspan JL, O'Toole A, et al. Population preference values for treatment outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a cross-sectional utility study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:50.CrossRef Beusterien KM, Davies J, Leach M, Meiklejohn D, Grinspan JL, O'Toole A, et al. Population preference values for treatment outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a cross-sectional utility study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:50.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Szabo SM, Levy AR, Davis C, Holyoake TL, Cortes J. A multinational study of health state preference values associated with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Value Health. 2010;13(1):103–11.CrossRef Szabo SM, Levy AR, Davis C, Holyoake TL, Cortes J. A multinational study of health state preference values associated with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Value Health. 2010;13(1):103–11.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Ferrara F, Schiffer CA. Acute myeloid leukaemia in adults. Lancet. 2013;381(9865):484–95.CrossRef Ferrara F, Schiffer CA. Acute myeloid leukaemia in adults. Lancet. 2013;381(9865):484–95.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Stein EM, Tallman MS. Emerging therapeutic drugs for AML. Blood. 2016;127(1):71–8.CrossRef Stein EM, Tallman MS. Emerging therapeutic drugs for AML. Blood. 2016;127(1):71–8.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in health care. BMJ. 2004;328(7436):360–1.CrossRef Ryan M. Discrete choice experiments in health care. BMJ. 2004;328(7436):360–1.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessing utility values for treatment-related health states of acute myeloid leukemia in the United States
Authors
Eytan M. Stein
Min Yang
Annie Guerin
Wei Gao
Philip Galebach
Cheryl Q. Xiang
Subrata Bhattacharyya
Gaetano Bonifacio
George J. Joseph
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1013-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2018 Go to the issue