Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research

Vulnerability in health and social capital: a qualitative analysis by levels of marginalization in Mexico

Authors: Oscar A. Martínez-Martínez, Anidelys Rodríguez-Brito

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Social capital is employed as an asset when there is a lack of an efficient health-care system. However, this relationship is not homogeneous and can differ according to the characteristics of individuals and their context. In this paper, we aim to analyze the role of social capital in the solution of healthcare problems among individuals with different levels of marginalization and unequal access to health services.

Methods

This qualitative study examines the role of social capital in the demand for healthcare among Mexican individuals with different levels of marginalization. The research draws data from semi-structured interviews (N = 247) that were collected in four Mexican states with different social welfare benefits: Mexico City, Tamaulipas, the State of Mexico, and Oaxaca. The interviewees were selected using the snowball method and other eligibility criteria such as education, age, and gender.

Results

Findings suggest that social capital is a relevant factor in solving healthcare problems, depending on the level of marginalization. The role of social capital can be explained by the precariousness of medical service delivery, the poor health infrastructure, and the difficult access to health care in Mexico. Networks are the main resource to deal with health related issues, food, medicine, and out-of-the-pocket medical expenses in contexts of high levels of marginalization. In the middle level of marginalization, networks also help in raising funds for more-specialized medical services and higher quality hospitals. In the least-marginalized levels, social capital is used as companionship for sick individuals, while support networks act as emotional relief. At this level, most individuals have private health insurance, and many of them have major medical healthcare coverage.

Conclusions

Participants reported low levels of trust in the health care system because of the poor infrastructure and quality of medical service delivery. Although the main criticism is focused on public healthcare institutions, there is a lack of trust in private medical services as well. These facts are related to the access and quality of medical service delivery and turn social capital into a significant asset. Despite that social bonds or links are valuable resources that individuals can use to solve healthcare related issues, the use of social capital is not homogenous. Indeed, it can be influenced by several factors that were represented in this study through the municipal marginalization index.
Literature
1.
CONEVAL. Diez años de medición de la pobreza multidimensional en México: avances y desafíos en política social. Ciudad de México: Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social; 2019.
2.
Lynch JW, Smith GD, Kaplan GA, et al. Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions. BMJ. 2000;320(7243):1200.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Marmot M, Wilkinson RG. Psychosocial and material pathways in the relation between income and health: a response to Lynch et al. BMJ. 2001;322(7296):1233.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
Szreter S, Woolcock M. Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:650–67.PubMedCrossRef
5.
CONEVAL. Metodología para la medición multidimensional de la pobreza en México. MéxicoDF: Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social; 2010.
6.
OCDE. Estudios de la OCDE sobre los Sistemas de Salud. México: OCDE; 2016.
7.
MCS-ENIGH. Módulo de condiciones socioeconómicas. Encuesta Nacional de Ingreso y Gasto en los Hogares. Ciudad de México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía; 2018.
8.
CONEVAL. Informe de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social en México 2014. México DF: Consejo Nacional para la Evaluación de la política Social; 2015.
9.
CONEVAL. Indicadores de acceso y uso efectivo de los servicios de salud de afiliados al Seguro Popular. México DF: Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social; 2014.
10.
Martínez-Martínez O, Lombe M, Vazquez-Rodriguez AM, et al. Rethinking the Construction of Welfare in Mexico: Going beyond the Economic Measures. Int J Soc Welf. 2016;25(3):259-72.CrossRef
11.
CONEVAL. Medición de la pobreza en México y en las entidades Federativas 2016. México, DF.: Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. 2017.
12.
Musalia J. Social capital and health in Kenya: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2016;167:11–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Mohnen SM, Groenewegen PP, Völker B, et al. Neighborhood social capital and individual health. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(5):660–7.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Mohnen SM, Völker B, Flap H, et al. The influence of social capital on individual health: is it the neighborhood or the network? Soc Indic Res. 2014;121(1):195–214.CrossRef
15.
Bourdieu P. Le capital social. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 1980; 31: 2–3.
16.
Coleman J. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1990.
17.
Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973;78(6):1360–80.CrossRef
18.
Putnam R. El declive del capital social: un estudio internacional sobre sociedades y el sentido comunitario. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg; 2003.
19.
Durston J. ¿Qué es el capital social comunitario? Santiago de Chile: Serie políticas sociales. Naciones Unidas, CEPAL; 2000.
20.
Rodríguez-Brito A. Redes de capital: (des)tejiendo relaciones sociales en Ciudad de México. Acercamiento a las articulaciones entre el uso de plataformas de comunicación en red y el capital social, según factores socioeconómicos y demográficos. [PhD. Thesis]. Mexico: Universidad Iberoamericana; 2018.
21.
Chen, H., Meng, T. Bonding, bridging, and linking social capital and self-rated health among Chinese adults: Use of the anchoring vignettes technique. PLoS One 2015, 10, 01 e0142300. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142300.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
23.
24.
25.
Kawachi I, Berkman LF. Social capital, social cohesion, and health. Social epidemiology. 2014;2:290–319.
26.
27.
Phelan JC, Link BG, Stueve A, et al. Public conceptions of mental illness in 1950 and 1996: what is mental illness and is it to be feared? J Health Soc Behav. 2000;41(2):188–207.CrossRef
28.
Skrabski Á, Kopp M, Kawachi I. Social capital in a changing society: cross sectional associations with middle aged female and male mortality rates. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(2):114–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Ziersch AM. Health implications of access to social capital: findings from an Australian study. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(10):2119–31.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Berry HL, Welsh JA. Social capital and health in Australia: an overview from the household, income and labor dynamics in Australia survey. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(4):588–96.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Prins RG, Mohnen SM, Lenthe v, et al. Are neighborhood social capital and availability of sports facilities related to sports participation among Dutch adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ. 2012;9:90.CrossRef
32.
Rözer J, Kraaykamp G, Huijts T. National income inequality and self-rated health: the differing impact of individual social trust across 89 countries. Eur Soc. 2016:1e19.
33.
De Silva MJD, McKenzie K, Harpham T, Huttly SRA. Social capital and mental illness: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(8):619–e627.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Jansson A, Karisto A, Pitkälä K. Loneliness in assisted living facilities: an exploration of the group process. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019:1–12.
35.
Beller J, Wagner A. Disentangling loneliness: differential effects of subjective loneliness, network quality, network size, and living alone on physical, mental, and cognitive health. J Aging Health. 2018;30(4):521–39.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Rottenberg, Y, Litwin, H, Manor, O, et al. Prediagnostic self-assessed health and extent of social networks predict survival in older individuals with cancer: a population based cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol 2014; 5, 400–407. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jgo.​2014.​08.​001.​PubMedCrossRef
37.
Herbolsheimer, F, Ungar, N, Peter, R. Why is social isolation among older adults associated with depressive symptoms? The mediating role of out-of-home physical activity. Int J Behav Med. 25;649-657:2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12529-018-9752-x.​PubMedCrossRef
38.
Gyasi RM, Yeboah AA, Mensah CM, et al. Neighborhood, social isolation and mental health outcome among older people in Ghana. J Affect Disord. 2019;259:154–63.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Hegeman A, Schutter N, Comijs H, et al. Loneliness and cardiovascular disease and the role of late-life depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33:e65–72.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Stoeckel KJ, Litwin H. The impact of social networks on the relationship between functional impairment and depressive symptoms in older adults. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28:39–47.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Arriagada I. Capital social: potencialidades y limitaciones analíticas de un concepto. Estudios Sociológicos. 2003;21:557–84.
42.
Ostrom E, Ahn TK. Una perspectiva del capital social desde las ciencias sociales: capital social y acción colectiva. Rev Mex Sociol. 2003;65:155–233.CrossRef
43.
Portes A. Capital social: sus orígenes y aplicaciones en la sociología moderna. In: Carpio J, Novacovsky I, editors. De Igual a igual. CLACSO: El desafío del Estado ante los nuevos problemas sociales. Fondo de Cultura Económica; 1999. p. 243–66.
44.
Helliwell JF, Putnam RD. The social context of well-being. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2004;359(1449):1435.CrossRef
45.
46.
Woolcock M. The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Can J Policy Res. 2001;2(1):11–7.
47.
Putnam R. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster; 2000.
48.
Szreter S. Social capital, the economy and education in historical perspective. In: Baron S, Field J, Schuller T, editors. Social capital: critical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
49.
Musalia JM. Gender, social networks, and contraceptive use in Kenya. Sex Roles. 2005;53(11e12):835–e846.CrossRef
50.
Baheiraei A, Bakouei F, Mohammadi E, et al. Association between social capital and health in women of reproductive age: a population-based study. Glob Health Promot. 2016;23:6–15.PubMedCrossRef
51.
House JS. Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman, Reading, MA; 1981.
52.
Gillies P. Effectiveness of alliances and partnerships for health promotion. Health Promot Int. 1998;13(2):99–120.CrossRef
53.
MacKian S. Complex cultures: rereading the story about health and social capital. Crit Soc Policy. 2002;22:203–25.CrossRef
54.
55.
Knack S, Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Q J Econ. 1997;112(4):1251–88.CrossRef
56.
Gilbert KL, Quinn SC, Goodman RM, et al. A meta-analysis of social capital and health: a case for needed research. J Health Psychol. 2013;18:1385–99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Smith S, Kulynych J. It may be social, but why is it capital? The social construction of social capital and the politics of language. Polit Soc. 2002;30(1):149–86.CrossRef
58.
CONAPO. Índice de Marginación Municipal. México DF: Consejo Nacional de Población; 2015.
59.
CONAPO. Índice de marginación por entidad federativa y municipio 2015. México DF: Consejo Nacional de Población; 2016.
60.
Martínez-Martínez O. Diseño y operación de un programa de transferencias monetarias: la Renta Garantizada de Ciudadanía, Ayuntamiento de Valencia, España. Desacatos. 2017;53:114-29.
61.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL, Strutzel E. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nurs Res. 1968;17(4):364.CrossRef
62.
Corbin J, Anselm S. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Inc.; 2008.
63.
Alvarez EC, Kawachi I, Romani JR. Family social capital and health–a systematic review and redirection. Soc Health Illn. 2017;39(1):5–29.CrossRef
64.
Smith GD, Lynch J. Commentary: social capital, social epidemiology and disease aetiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33(4):691–700.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Dahl E, Malmberg-Heimonen I. Social inequality and health: the role of social capital. Soc Health Illn. 2010;32(7):1102–19.CrossRef
66.
Berkman LF, Glass T. Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Soc Epidemiol. 2000;1:137–73.
Metadata
Title
Vulnerability in health and social capital: a qualitative analysis by levels of marginalization in Mexico
Authors
Oscar A. Martínez-Martínez
Anidelys Rodríguez-Brito
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-1138-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2020 Go to the issue

Research

Utilization profile of emergency department by irregular migrants and hospitalization rates: lessons from a large urban medical center in Tel Aviv, Israel

Research

Identifying the determinants of health insurance coverage among Peruvian women of reproductive age: an assessment based on the national Peruvian demographic survey of 2017

Research

Typology of organizational innovation components: building blocks to improve access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations

Research

Cancer screening among racial/ethnic groups in health centers

Short report

Economic fluctuations and urban-rural differences in educational inequalities in mortality in the Baltic countries and Finland in 2000–2015: a register-based study

Commentary

The challenges facing indigenous communities in Latin America as they confront the COVID-19 pandemic