Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

A turnaround strategy: improving equity in order to achieve quality of care and financial sustainability in Italy

Authors: Gianluca Cafagna, Chiara Seghieri, Milena Vainieri, Sabina Nuti

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Equity, financial sustainability, and quality in healthcare are key goals embraced by universal health systems. However, systematic performance management strategies for achieving equity are still weaker than those aimed at achieving financial sustainability and quality of care. Using a vertical equity perspective, the overarching aim of this paper is to examine how improving equity in quality of care impacts on financial sustainability. We applied a simulation to indicators of the heart failure clinical pathway in Tuscany (central Italy), in order to quantify the equity gaps and financial resources that could be reallocated in the absence of performance inequities.

Methods

The analysis included all patients hospitalized for heart failure as a principal diagnosis in 2014. We selected five indicators: hospitalization rate, 30-day readmission, cardiology visits, and the utilization of beta-blockers, and ACE inhibitors and sartans. For each indicator, the simulation followed three steps: 1) stratification by socioeconomic status (SES), using education as a proxy for SES; 2) computation of the vertical equity indicator; and 3) assessment of the financial value of the equity gap.

Results

All indicators showed performance gaps regarding inequities across SES-groups. For the hospitalization rate and 30-day readmission, resources could have been reallocated, if the performance of patients with a low SES had been equal to the performance of patients with a high SES, which amounted to €2,144,422 and €892,790 respectively. In contrast, limited additional resources would have been required for prescriptions and cardiology visits.

Conclusions

Reducing equity gaps by improving the performance of low-SES patients may be a crucial strategy to achieving financial sustainability in universal coverage healthcare systems. Universal healthcare systems, which aim to pursue financial sustainability and quality of care, are thus urged to develop performance management actions to improve equity. This approach should not only include the measurement and public disclosure of equity indicators but be part of a comprehensive evidence-based strategy for the management of chronic conditions along the clinical pathway.
Literature
1.
Papanicolas I, Smith P. Health system performance comparison: an agenda for policy, information and research: an agenda for policy, information and research. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education; 2013.
2.
Aday LA. Evaluating the healthcare system: effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2004.
3.
Reeve C, Humphreys J, Wakerman J. A comprehensive health service evaluation and monitoring framework. Eval Program Plann. 2015;53:91–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Ferreira A, Oltey D. The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis. Manage Account Res. 2009;20(4):263–82.CrossRef
5.
Smith P, Mossialos E, Papanicolas I, Leatherman S. Performance measurement for health system improvement: experiences, challenges and prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
6.
Barsanti S, Nuti S. The equity lens in the health care performance evaluation system. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2014;29(3):e233–46.CrossRef
7.
Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv Plan Adm Eval. 1992;22(3):429–45.CrossRef
8.
9.
Ward PR. The relevance of equity in health care for primary care: creating and sustaining a ‘fair go, for a fair innings’. Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(1):49–54.PubMed
10.
Appleby J, Raleigh V, Frosini F, Bevan G, Gao H, Lyscom T. Variations in health care: the good, the bad and the inexplicable. London: The King’s Fund; 2011.
11.
NHS Right Care. The NHS Atlas of Variation in Healthcare. Reducing unwarranted variation to increase value and improve quality. London: NHS Right Care; 2016.
12.
OECD. Geographic Variations in Health Care. What do we know and what can be done to improve health system performance? Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2014.
13.
Nuti S, Seghieri C. Is variation management included in regional healthcare governance systems? Some proposals from Italy. Health Policy. 2014;114(1):71–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Cafagna G, Seghieri C. Educational level and 30-day outcomes after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction in Italy. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Cookson R, Propper C, Asaria M, Raine R. Socio-economic inequalities in health Care in England. Fisc Stud. 2016;37(3–4):371–403.CrossRef
16.
Barsanti S, Salmi L-R, Bourgueil Y, Daponte A, Pinzal E, Ménival S. Strategies and governance to reduce health inequalities: evidences from a cross-European survey. Glob Health Res Policy. 2017;2:18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Goodwin N. How do you build programmes of integrated care? The need to broaden our conceptual and empirical understanding. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:e40.
18.
WHO. Integrated care models: an overview. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2016.
19.
Nuti S, Bini B, Ruggieri TG, Piaggesi A, Ricci L. Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in Integrated Care: The Case of the Diabetic Foot Pathway in Tuscany. Int J Integr Care. 2016;16(2):9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
21.
Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Equity in health care finance and delivery. In: Handbook of Health Economics. Oxford: Elsevier; 2000. p. 1803–62.
22.
Ubel PA, DeKay ML, Baron J, Asch DA. Cost-effectiveness analysis in a setting of budget constraints — is it equitable? N Engl J Med. 1996;334(18):1174–7.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Williams AH, Cookson RA. Equity-efficiency trade-offs in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(1):1–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
James C, Carrin G, Savedoff W, Hanvoravongchai P. Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries. Health Care Anal. 2005;13(1):33–51.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Culyer AJ. The bogus conflict between efficiency and vertical equity. Health Econ. 2006;15(11):1155–8.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Culyer AJ. Efficiency, equity and equality in health and health care. No. 120cherp. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York; 2015.
27.
Reidpath DD, Olafsdottir AE, Pokhrel S, Allotey P. The fallacy of the equity-efficiency trade off: rethinking the efficient health system. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(Suppl 1):S3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Davis P, Milne B, Parker K, Hider P, Lay-Yee R, Cumming J, et al. Efficiency, effectiveness, equity (E3). Evaluating hospital performance in three dimensions. Health Policy. 2013;112(1):19–27.PubMedCrossRef
29.
30.
Asaria M, Doran T, Cookson R. The costs of inequality: whole-population modelling study of lifetime inpatient hospital costs in the English National Health Service by level of neighbourhood deprivation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(10):990–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Public Health Agency of Canada. The Direct Economic Burden of Socioeconomic Health Inequalities in Canada: An Analysis of Health Care Costs by Income Level. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2016.
32.
Mackenbach JP, Meerding WJ, Kunst A. Economic implications of socio-economic inequalities in health in the European Union. European Commission: Rotterdam; 2007.
33.
LaVeist TA, Gaskin D, Richard P. Estimating the economic burden of racial health inequalities in the United States. Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(2):231–8.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Ferre F, de Belvis AG, Valerio L, Longhi S, Lazzari A, Fattore G, et al. Italy: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2014;16(4):1–168.PubMed
35.
Sagan A, Thomson S. Voluntary health insurance in Europe: role and regulation. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2016.
36.
Nuti S. Il sistema di valutazione della performance in sanità. Bologna: Il Mulino; 2008.
37.
Nuti S, Seghieri C, Vainieri M. Assessing the effectiveness of a performance evaluation system in the public health care sector: some novel evidence from the Tuscany region experience. J Manag Gov. 2013;17(1):59–69.CrossRef
38.
Nuti S, Vola F, Amat P. Evaluating the network healthcare system performance. Pisa: MeS Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna; 2015.
39.
Dimitrovová K, Costa C, Santana P, Perelman J. Evolution and financial cost of socioeconomic inequalities in ambulatory care sensitive conditions: an ecological study for Portugal, 2000-2014. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):145.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Agabiti N, Pirani M, Schifano P, Cesaroni G, Davoli M, Bisanti L, et al. Income level and chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions in adults: a multicity population-based study in Italy. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:457.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Roos LL, Walld R, Uhanova J, Bond R. Physician visits, hospitalizations, and socioeconomic status: ambulatory care sensitive conditions in a Canadian setting. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(4):1167–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Buja A, Solinas G, Visca M, Federico B, Gini R, Baldo V, et al. Prevalence of heart failure and adherence to process indicators: which socio-demographic determinants are involved? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(2):238.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Rathore SS, Masoudi FA, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Foody JM, Havranek EP, et al. Socioeconomic status, treatment, and outcomes among elderly patients hospitalized with heart failure: findings from the National Heart Failure Project. Am Heart J. 2006;152(2):371–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
45.
Manderbacka K, Keskimäki I, Reunanen A, Klaukka T. Equity in the use of antithrombotic drugs, beta-blockers and statins among Finnish coronary patients. Int J Equity Health. 2008;7:16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
46.
Hyun KK, Brieger D, Woodward M, Richtering S, Redfern J. The effect of socioeconomic disadvantage on prescription of guideline-recommended medications for patients with acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):162.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
48.
Hawkins NM, Jhund PS, McMurray JJV, Capewell S. Heart failure and socioeconomic status: accumulating evidence of inequality. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14(2):138–46.PubMedCrossRef
49.
van Loenen T, van den Berg MJ, Westert GP, Faber MJ. Organizational aspects of primary care related to avoidable hospitalization: a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2014;31(5):502–16.PubMedCrossRef
50.
51.
Vainieri M, D’Amato L, Podetti S, Cerausolo D. L sistema di valutazione della performance della sanità Toscana. Pisa: MeS Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna; 2016.
52.
Picciotto S, Forastiere F, Stafoggia M, D’Ippoliti D, Ancona C, Perucci CA. Associations of area based deprivation status and individual educational attainment with incidence, treatment, and prognosis of first coronary event in Rome, Italy. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(1):37–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Berta P, Seghieri C, Vittadini G. Comparing health outcomes among hospitals: the experience of the Lombardy region. Health Care Manag Sci. 2013;16(3):245–57.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Hannan EL, Wu C, DeLong ER, Raudenbush SW. Predicting risk-adjusted mortality for CABG surgery: logistic versus hierarchical logistic models. Med Care. 2005;43(7):726–35.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Charlson ME, Charlson RE, Peterson JC, Marinopoulos SS, Briggs WM, Hollenberg JP. The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primary care patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(12):1234–40.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Nuti S, Vainieri M, Bonini A. Disinvestment for re-allocation: a process to identify priorities in healthcare. Health Policy. 2010;95(2):137–43.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Goldman DP, Smith JP. Can patient self-management help explain the SES health gradient? Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99(16):10929–34.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Makaryus AN, Friedman EA. Patients’ understanding of their treatment plans and diagnosis at discharge. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(8):991–4.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Magán P, Alberquilla A, Otero A, Ribera JM. Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions and quality of primary care: their relation with socioeconomic and health care variables in the Madrid regional health service (Spain). Med Care. 2011;49(1):17–23.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Goddard M, Smith P. Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(9):1149–62.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Shah SM, Carey IM, DeWilde S, Richards N, Cook DG. Trends and inequities in beta-blocker prescribing for heart failure. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58(557):862–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(8):891–975.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Nuti S, Vainieri M. Priority setting in sanità: l’esperienza del percorso scompenso cardiaco e diabete mellito di tipo 2. Bologna: Il Mulino; 2013.
64.
Hernandez AF, Greiner MA, Fonarow GC, Hammill BG, Heidenreich PA, Yancy CW, et al. Relationship between early physician follow-up and 30-day readmission among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for heart failure. JAMA. 2010;303(17):1716–22.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Lambert-Kerzner A, Del Giacco EJ, Fahdi IE, Bryson CL, Melnyk SD, Bosworth HB, et al. Patient-centered adherence intervention after acute coronary syndrome hospitalization. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(4):571–6.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Barletta V, Profili F, Gini R, Grilli L, Rampichini C, Matarrese D, et al. Impact of chronic care model on diabetes care in Tuscany: a controlled before-after study. Eur J Pub Health. 2016;27(1):8–13.
67.
Davy C, Bleasel J, Liu H, Tchan M, Ponniah S, Brown A. Effectiveness of chronic care models: opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Bevan G, Wilson D. Does ‘naming and shaming’ work for schools and hospitals? Lessons from natural experiments following devolution in England and Wales. Public Money Manag. 2013;33(4):245–52.CrossRef
69.
Leatherman S, McCarthy D. Public disclosure of health care performance reports: experience, evidence and issues for policy. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999;11(2):93–8.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Cookson R, Asaria M, Ali S, Ferguson B, Fleetcroft R, Goddard M, et al. Health equity indicators for the English NHS: a longitudinal whole-population study at the small-area level. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2016.
71.
Ventura M, Colais P, Fusco D, Agabiti N, Cesaroni G, Davoli M. Information on educational level from hospital discharge register: an analysis of validity. Epidemiol Prev. 2013;37(4–5):289–96.PubMed
Metadata
Title
A turnaround strategy: improving equity in order to achieve quality of care and financial sustainability in Italy
Authors
Gianluca Cafagna
Chiara Seghieri
Milena Vainieri
Sabina Nuti
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0878-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Commentary

What have the social sciences ever done for equity in health policy and health systems?

Research

Contracting-out urban primary health care in Bangladesh: a qualitative exploration of implementation processes and experience

Research

Measuring financial protection against catastrophic health expenditures: methodological challenges for global monitoring

Systematic review

How do macro-level structural determinants affect inequalities in mental health? – a systematic review of the literature

Research

Accountability mechanisms for implementing a health financing option: the case of the basic health care provision fund (BHCPF) in Nigeria

Research

Critical considerations for the practical utility of health equity tools: a concept mapping study