Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

The Infant Feeding Genogram: a tool for exploring family infant feeding history and identifying support needs

Authors: K. L. Darwent, R. J. McInnes, V. Swanson

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Family culture and beliefs are passed through the generations within families and influence what constitutes appropriate infant care. This includes infant feeding decisions where a family history and support network congruent with women’s infant feeding intentions has been shown to be important to women’s breastfeeding experience. This is reflected in breastfeeding rates where women who were not breastfed themselves are less likely to initiate and continue with breastfeeding. Given the importance of family infant feeding history in the initiation and duration of breastfeeding, and the limited ability of some families to provide support; it is unclear why infant feeding family history and support networks are not explored during pregnancy.

Methods

The Infant Feeding Genogram was adapted from a simple pictorial device that is widely used in psychotherapy and genetic counselling. This tool was developed as part of a study investigating the experience of women when they were the first to breastfeed in their family. Fourteen Scottish participants completed their Infant Feeding Genogram as part of a semi-structured interview. The tool was adapted alongside their narratives to give a visual representation of each participant’s family infant feeding history.

Results

The utility of the genogram is illustrated through two contrasting case examples with very different family feeding histories. The genogram showed family structures, patterns of infant feeding over time, and supportive or conflicting relationships. In the research setting it assisted women to explore their infant feeding history, identify challenges and sources of support and build rapport with the interviewer.

Conclusions

The infant feeding genogram is proposed as a time efficient tool that could assist health professionals and other breastfeeding workers to support women and their families and by stimulating discussion around breastfeeding, Bby identifying strengths or possible deficits in social support for each individual, the tool could inform tailored support and care interventions. The effectiveness and acceptability of the Infant Feeding Genogram requires testing in the clinical environment. However, its successful application in other clinical contexts, combined with the interest in genealogy in popular culture, mean this is likely to be an acceptable, family friendly way to develop more effective breastfeeding conversations.
Literature
1.
Renfrew MJ, Pokhrel S, Quigley M, McCormick F, Fox-Rushby J, Dodds R, et al. Preventing disease and saving resources: The potential contribution of increasing breastfeeding rates in the UK. UNICEF: London; 2012.
2.
Quigley M, Hokley C, Carson C, Kelly Y, Renfrew MJ, Sacker A. Breastfeeding is associated with improved child cognitive development: a population-based cohort study. Pediatrics. 2012;160:25–32.CrossRef
3.
Fisk CM, Crozier SR, Inskip HM, Godfrey KM, Cooper C, Roberts GC, et al. Breastfeeding and reported morbidity in infancy: findings from the Southampton Women’s Survey. Matern Child Nutr. 2011;7:61–70.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Quigley M, Kelly YJ, Sacker A. Breastfeeding and hospitalization for diarrhoeal and respiratory infection in the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study. Pediatrics. 2011;119:837–42.CrossRef
5.
Yang L, Jacobson KH. A systematic review of the association between breastfeeding and breast cancer. J Women’s Health. 2008;17(10):1635–45.CrossRef
6.
Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, Chew P, Magula N, Devine D, Trikalinos T, Lau J. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 153, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2007;(153):1–186.
7.
World Health Organisation: The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
8.
9.
Bradshaw P, Bromley C, Hill T, Mabelis J, Parkes A, Smith K. et al. Growing up in Scotland: birth cohort 2—results from the first year. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2013.
10.
Bolling K, Grant C, Hamlyn B, and Thornton A. Infant Feeding Survey 2005, London: The Information Study; 2007.
11.
Forster DA, Mclachlan HL, Lumley J. Factors associated with breastfeeding at 6 months postpartum in a group of Australian women. Int Breastfeed J. 2006;12:18.CrossRef
12.
13.
Scott JA, Landers MC, Hughes RM, Binns CW. Factors associated with breastfeeding at discharge and duration of breastfeeding. J Paediatr Child Health. 2001;37:254–61.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Ekström A, Widström AM, Nissen E. Breastfeeding support from partners and grandmothers: perceptions of Swedish women. Birth. 2003;30(4):261–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Swanson V, Power K, Kaur B, Carter H, Shepherd K. The impact of knowledge and social influences on adolescents’ breast-feeding beliefs and intentions. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(3):297–305.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Barona-Vilar C, Escribaaguir V, Ferrerogandia R. A qualitative approach to social support and breast-feeding decisions. Midwifery. 2009;25(2):187–94.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Mcinnes R, Chambers J. Supporting breastfeeding mothers: Qualitative synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(4):407–27.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
WHO, International code of marketing of breastmilk substitutes. Geneva, WHO; 1981.
20.
21.
Byng-Hall J. The family script: a useful bridge between theory and practice. J Fam Ther. 1985;7(3):301–5.
22.
Byng-Hall J. Rewriting family scripts: improvisation and systems change. London: Guilford Press; 1995.
23.
Cowan PA, Cowan CP. Becoming a family: research and intervention. In Sigel IG. and Brody GH. (editors), Methods of family research: biographies of research projects. vol I.: Normal families. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1990
24.
Thomson R, Kehily MJ, Hadfield L, Sharpe S. Making modern mothers, Bristol: Policy Press; 2011.
25.
Darvill R, Skirton H, Farrand P. Psychological factors that impact on women’s experiences of first-time motherhood: a qualitative study of the transition. Midwifery. 2010;26(3):357–66.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Henwood K, Shirani F, Coltart C. Fathers and financial risk-taking during the economic downturn: insights from a QLL study of men’s identities-in-the-making. 21st Century. Society. 2010;5(2):137–47.
27.
Reid J, Schmied V, Beale V. ‘I only give advice if I am asked’: Examining the grandmother’s potential to influence infant feeding decisions and parenting practices of new mothers. Women Birth. 2010;23(2):74–80.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Dykes F, Griffiths H. Societal influences upon initiation and continuation of breastfeeding. Br J Midwifery. 1998;6(2):76–80.CrossRef
29.
Dykes F, Moran V, Burt S, Edwards J. Adolescent mothers and breastfeeding: experiences and support needs-an exploratory study. J Hum Lact. 2003;19(4):391–400.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Scott JA, Mostyn T. Women’s experiences of breastfeeding in a bottle-feeding culture. J Hum Lact. 2003;19(3):270–7.CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
Grassley JS, Eschiti V. Grandmother breastfeeding support: what do mothers need and want? Birth. 2008;35(4):329–35.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Suisin LRO, Giugliani ERJ, Kummer SC. Influence of grandmothers on breastfeeding practices. Rev Saude Publica. 2005;39(2):141–7.CrossRef
34.
Dykes F, Williams C. Falling by the wayside: a phenomenological exploration of perceived breast-milk inadequacy in lactating women. Midwifery. 1999;15(4):232–46.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Hauck YL, Irurita VF. Incompatible expectations: the dilemma of breastfeeding mothers. Health Care Women Int. 2003;24(1):62–78.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Lavender T, Mcfadden C, Baker L. Breastfeeding and family life. Matern Child Nutr. 2006;2(3):145–55.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Hall Moran V, Edwards J, Dykes F, Downe S. A systematic review of the nature of support for breast-feeding adolescent mothers. Midwifery. 2007;23(2):157–71.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Winterburn S, Jiwa M, Thompson J. Maternal grandmothers and support for breastfeeding: research by randomised controlled trial in North Trent. J Comm Nurs. 2003;17(12):4–9.
39.
Brannen J. Cultures of intergenerational transmission in four-generation families. Sociol Rev. 2006;54:133–54.CrossRef
40.
Entwistle F, Kendall S, Mead M. Breastfeeding support ? The importance of self-efficacy for low-income women. Matern Child Nutr. 2010;6(3):228–42.PubMed
41.
Lamm B, Keller H, Yovsi RD, Chaudhary N. Grandmaternal and maternal ethnotheories about early child care. J Fam Psychol. 2008;22(1):80–8.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Bryant CA. The impact of kin, friend and neighbour networks on infant feeding practices: Cuban, Puerto Rican and Anglo families in Florida. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(20):1757–65.CrossRefPubMed
43.
44.
Grassley JS, Eschiti VS. Two generations learning together: facilitating grandmothers’ support of breastfeeding. Int J Childbirth Educ. 2008;22(3):23–6.
45.
46.
47.
48.
McGoldrick M, Shellenberger S. and Petry, SS. Genograms: Assessment and Intervention. 3rd ed. New York: Norton Professional Books; 2008.
49.
Puskar K, Faan PH, Nerone M. Genogram: a useful tool for nurse practitioners. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 1996;3(1):55–60.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Martinez A, D’Artois D, Rennick JE. Does the 15-min (or less) family interview influence family nursing practice. J Fam Nurs. 2007;13(2):157–78.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Dudley-Brown SL. The genetic family history assessment in gastroenterology nursing practice. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2004;27(3):107–10.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Hockley J. Psychosocial aspects in palliative care: communicating with the patient and family. Acta Oncol. 2000;39(8):905–10.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Wright LM, Leahey M. Maximising time, minimising suffering: 15 min (or less) family interviews. J Fam Nurs. 1999;5(3):259–74.CrossRef
54.
Rogers K, Durkin M. The semi-structured genogram interview: I Protocol. II. Evaluation. Fam Syst Med. 1984;2(2):176–87.CrossRef
55.
Platt LF, Skowron EA. The family genogram interview reliability and validity of a new interview protocol. Fam J. 2013;21(1):35–45.CrossRef
56.
Mcinnes RJ, Hoddinott P, Britten J, Darwent K, Craig LC. Significant others, situations and infant feeding behaviour change processes: a serial qualitative interview study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Hoddinott P, Craig LCA, Britten J, Mcinnes R. A serial qualitative interview study of infant feeding experiences: idealism meets realism. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e0000504.
58.
Williamson RI, Sacranie MS. Nourishing body and spirit: exploring British Muslim mothers’ constructions and experiences of breastfeeding. Diversity Equality Health Care. 2012;9(2):113–23.
59.
Schmied V, Sheehan A, Fenwick J, Dykes F. Embodied knowledge and emotional labour in family Conversations about breastfeeding: a discourse analysis. Women Birth. 2013;26:S18.CrossRef
60.
61.
62.
Boscolo L, Bertrando P. Systemic therapy with individuals. London: Karnac Books;1996.
63.
Darwent KL, Kempenaar LE. A comparison of breastfeeding women’s, peer supporters’ and student midwives’ breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014;14(3):319–25.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Dykes F. The education of health practitioners supporting breastfeeding mothers: time for critical reflection. Matern Child Nutr. 2006;2(4):204–16.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Infant Feeding Genogram: a tool for exploring family infant feeding history and identifying support needs
Authors
K. L. Darwent
R. J. McInnes
V. Swanson
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1107-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

This baby is not for turning: Women’s experiences of attempted external cephalic version

Study protocol

Early nasogastric tube feeding in optimising treatment for hyperemesis gravidarum: the MOTHER randomised controlled trial (Maternal and Offspring outcomes after Treatment of HyperEmesis by Refeeding)

Research article

Pregnancy outcome in women with Eisenmenger’s syndrome: a case series from west China

Research article

A description of sleep behaviour in healthy late pregnancy, and the accuracy of self-reports

Research article

Obesity and pregnancy outcomes: Do the relationships differ by maternal region of birth? A retrospective cohort study

Research article

Perinatal outcomes of reduced fetal movements: a cohort study