Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Changing cluster composition in cluster randomised controlled trials: design and analysis considerations

Authors: Neil Corrigan, Michael J G Bankart, Laura J Gray, Karen L Smith

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are many methodological challenges in the conduct and analysis of cluster randomised controlled trials, but one that has received little attention is that of post-randomisation changes to cluster composition. To illustrate this, we focus on the issue of cluster merging, considering the impact on the design, analysis and interpretation of trial outcomes.

Methods

We explored the effects of merging clusters on study power using standard methods of power calculation. We assessed the potential impacts on study findings of both homogeneous cluster merges (involving clusters randomised to the same arm of a trial) and heterogeneous merges (involving clusters randomised to different arms of a trial) by simulation. To determine the impact on bias and precision of treatment effect estimates, we applied standard methods of analysis to different populations under analysis.

Results

Cluster merging produced a systematic reduction in study power. This effect depended on the number of merges and was most pronounced when variability in cluster size was at its greatest. Simulations demonstrate that the impact on analysis was minimal when cluster merges were homogeneous, with impact on study power being balanced by a change in observed intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC). We found a decrease in study power when cluster merges were heterogeneous, and the estimate of treatment effect was attenuated.

Conclusions

Examples of cluster merges found in previously published reports of cluster randomised trials were typically homogeneous rather than heterogeneous. Simulations demonstrated that trial findings in such cases would be unbiased. However, simulations also showed that any heterogeneous cluster merges would introduce bias that would be hard to quantify, as well as having negative impacts on the precision of estimates obtained. Further methodological development is warranted to better determine how to analyse such trials appropriately. Interim recommendations include avoidance of cluster merges where possible, discontinuation of clusters following heterogeneous merges, allowance for potential loss of clusters and additional variability in cluster size in the original sample size calculation, and use of appropriate ICC estimates that reflect cluster size.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hayes RJ, Moulton LH: Cluster Randomised Trials. 2009, Boca Raton FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC PressCrossRef Hayes RJ, Moulton LH: Cluster Randomised Trials. 2009, Boca Raton FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC PressCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Eldridge S, Kerry S: A Practical Guide to Cluster Randomised Trials in Health Services Research. 2012, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & SonsCrossRef Eldridge S, Kerry S: A Practical Guide to Cluster Randomised Trials in Health Services Research. 2012, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & SonsCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG; CONSORT Group: CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2004, 328: 702-708. 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG; CONSORT Group: CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2004, 328: 702-708. 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Foy R, Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Hawthorne G, Steen N, Gibb I, Croal B, Grimshaw J: A cluster randomised trial of educational messages to improve the primary care of diabetes. Implement Sci. 2011, 6: 129-10.1186/1748-5908-6-129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Foy R, Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Hawthorne G, Steen N, Gibb I, Croal B, Grimshaw J: A cluster randomised trial of educational messages to improve the primary care of diabetes. Implement Sci. 2011, 6: 129-10.1186/1748-5908-6-129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Schermer TR, Akkermans RP, Crockett AJ, van Montfort M, Grootens-Stekelenburg J, Stout JW, Pieters W: Effect of e-learning and repeated performance feedback on spirometry test quality in family practice: a cluster trial. Ann Fam Med. 2011, 9: 330-336. 10.1370/afm.1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schermer TR, Akkermans RP, Crockett AJ, van Montfort M, Grootens-Stekelenburg J, Stout JW, Pieters W: Effect of e-learning and repeated performance feedback on spirometry test quality in family practice: a cluster trial. Ann Fam Med. 2011, 9: 330-336. 10.1370/afm.1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Donner A, Birkett N, Buck C: Randomization by cluster: sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1981, 114: 906-914.PubMed Donner A, Birkett N, Buck C: Randomization by cluster: sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1981, 114: 906-914.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hemming K, Girling AJ, Sitch AJ, March J, Lilford RJ: Sample size calculations for cluster randomised controlled trials with a fixed number of clusters. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011, 11: 102-10.1186/1471-2288-11-102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hemming K, Girling AJ, Sitch AJ, March J, Lilford RJ: Sample size calculations for cluster randomised controlled trials with a fixed number of clusters. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011, 11: 102-10.1186/1471-2288-11-102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Kerry SM, Bland JM: Unequal cluster sizes for trials in English and Welsh general practice: implications for sample size calculations. Stat Med. 2001, 20: 377-390. 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<377::AID-SIM799>3.0.CO;2-N.CrossRefPubMed Kerry SM, Bland JM: Unequal cluster sizes for trials in English and Welsh general practice: implications for sample size calculations. Stat Med. 2001, 20: 377-390. 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<377::AID-SIM799>3.0.CO;2-N.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lake S, Kammann E, Klar N, Betensky R: Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials. Stat Med. 2002, 21: 1337-1350. 10.1002/sim.1121.CrossRefPubMed Lake S, Kammann E, Klar N, Betensky R: Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials. Stat Med. 2002, 21: 1337-1350. 10.1002/sim.1121.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Kerry S: Sample size for cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method. Int J Epidemiol. 2006, 35: 1292-1300. 10.1093/ije/dyl129.CrossRefPubMed Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Kerry S: Sample size for cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method. Int J Epidemiol. 2006, 35: 1292-1300. 10.1093/ije/dyl129.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kong SH, Ahn CW, Jung SH: Sample size calculation for dichotomous outcomes in cluster randomization trials with varying cluster size. Drug Inf J. 2003, 37: 109-114. Kong SH, Ahn CW, Jung SH: Sample size calculation for dichotomous outcomes in cluster randomization trials with varying cluster size. Drug Inf J. 2003, 37: 109-114.
14.
go back to reference Manatunga AK, Hudgens MG, Chen S: Sample size estimation in cluster randomized studies with varying cluster size. Biom J. 2001, 43: 75-86. 10.1002/1521-4036(200102)43:1<75::AID-BIMJ75>3.0.CO;2-N.CrossRef Manatunga AK, Hudgens MG, Chen S: Sample size estimation in cluster randomized studies with varying cluster size. Biom J. 2001, 43: 75-86. 10.1002/1521-4036(200102)43:1<75::AID-BIMJ75>3.0.CO;2-N.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Twisk JWR: Applied Multilevel Analysis: A Practical Guide for Medical Researchers. 2006, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Twisk JWR: Applied Multilevel Analysis: A Practical Guide for Medical Researchers. 2006, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Taljaard M, Donner A, Klar N: Accounting for expected attrition in the planning of community intervention trials. Stat Med. 2007, 26: 2615-2628. 10.1002/sim.2733.CrossRefPubMed Taljaard M, Donner A, Klar N: Accounting for expected attrition in the planning of community intervention trials. Stat Med. 2007, 26: 2615-2628. 10.1002/sim.2733.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Donner A: An empirical study of cluster randomization. Int J Epidemiol. 1982, 11: 283-286. 10.1093/ije/11.3.283.CrossRefPubMed Donner A: An empirical study of cluster randomization. Int J Epidemiol. 1982, 11: 283-286. 10.1093/ije/11.3.283.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Chinn S: Components of variance and intraclass correlations for the design of community-based surveys and intervention studies: data from the Health Survey for England 1994. Am J Epidemiol. 1999, 149: 876-883. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009904.CrossRefPubMed Gulliford MC, Ukoumunne OC, Chinn S: Components of variance and intraclass correlations for the design of community-based surveys and intervention studies: data from the Health Survey for England 1994. Am J Epidemiol. 1999, 149: 876-883. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009904.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Feder GS, Rudnicka AR, Ukoumunne OC: Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care. Clin Trials. 2004, 1: 80-90. 10.1191/1740774504cn006rr.CrossRefPubMed Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Feder GS, Rudnicka AR, Ukoumunne OC: Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care. Clin Trials. 2004, 1: 80-90. 10.1191/1740774504cn006rr.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Diehr P, Martin DC, Koepsell T, Cheadle A, Psaty BM, Wagner EH: Optimal survey design for community evaluations: cohort or cross-sectional. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995, 48: 1461-1472. 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00055-0.CrossRefPubMed Diehr P, Martin DC, Koepsell T, Cheadle A, Psaty BM, Wagner EH: Optimal survey design for community evaluations: cohort or cross-sectional. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995, 48: 1461-1472. 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00055-0.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Changing cluster composition in cluster randomised controlled trials: design and analysis considerations
Authors
Neil Corrigan
Michael J G Bankart
Laura J Gray
Karen L Smith
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-184

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Trials 1/2014 Go to the issue