Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2/2021

Open Access 01-04-2021 | Artificial Intelligence | Original Research

Performance of a closed-loop glucose control system, comprising a continuous glucose monitoring system and an AI-based controller in swine during severe hypo- and hyperglycemic provocations

Authors: Jeremy DeJournett, Michael Nekludov, Leon DeJournett, Mats Wallin

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients develop stress induced insulin resistance causing hyperglycemia, large glucose variability and hypoglycemia. These glucose metrics have all been associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. The only way to achieve safe glucose control at a lower glucose range (e.g., 4.4–6.6 mmol/L) will be through use of an autonomous closed loop glucose control system (artificial pancreas). Our goal with the present study was to assess the safety and performance of an artificial pancreas system, composed of the EIRUS (Maquet Critical Care AB) continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and novel artificial intelligence-based glucose control software, in a swine model using unannounced hypo- and hyperglycemia challenges. Fourteen piglets (6 control, 8 treated) underwent sequential unannounced hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic challenges with 3 IU of NovoRapid and a glucose infusion at 17 mg/kg/min over the course of 5 h. In the Control animals an experienced ICU physician used every 30-min blood glucose values to maintain control to a range of 4.4–9 mmol/L. In the Treated group the artificial pancreas system attempted to maintain blood glucose control to a range of 4.4–6.6 mmol/L. Five of six Control animals and none of eight Treated animals experienced severe hypoglycemia (< 2.22 mmol/L). The area under the curve 3.5 mmol/L was 28.9 (21.1–54.2) for Control and 4.8 (3.1–5.2) for the Treated animals. The total percent time within tight glucose control range, 4.4–6.6 mmol/L, was 32.8% (32.4–47.1) for Controls and 55.4% (52.9–59.4) for Treated (p < 0.034). Data are median and quartiles. The artificial pancreas system abolished severe hypoglycemia and outperformed the experienced ICU physician in avoiding clinically significant hypoglycemic excursions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1359–67.CrossRef van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1359–67.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Krinsley JS. Effect of an intensive glucose management protocol on the mortality of critically ill adult patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79(8):992–1000.CrossRef Krinsley JS. Effect of an intensive glucose management protocol on the mortality of critically ill adult patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79(8):992–1000.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Okabayashi T, Shima Y, Sumiyoshi T, Kozuki A, Tokumaru T, Iiyama T, et al. Intensive versus intermediate glucose control in surgical intensive care unit patients. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(6):1516–24.CrossRef Okabayashi T, Shima Y, Sumiyoshi T, Kozuki A, Tokumaru T, Iiyama T, et al. Intensive versus intermediate glucose control in surgical intensive care unit patients. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(6):1516–24.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Krinsley JS, Maurer P, Holewinski S, Hayes R, McComsey D, Umpierrez GE, et al. Glucose control, diabetes status, and mortality in critically Ill patients: the continuum from intensive care unit admission to hospital discharge. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(7):1019–29.CrossRef Krinsley JS, Maurer P, Holewinski S, Hayes R, McComsey D, Umpierrez GE, et al. Glucose control, diabetes status, and mortality in critically Ill patients: the continuum from intensive care unit admission to hospital discharge. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92(7):1019–29.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Scalea TM, Bochicchio GV, Bochicchio KM, Johnson SB, Joshi M, Pyle A. Tight glycemic control in critically injured trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2007;246(4):605–10.CrossRef Scalea TM, Bochicchio GV, Bochicchio KM, Johnson SB, Joshi M, Pyle A. Tight glycemic control in critically injured trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2007;246(4):605–10.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kosiborod M, Inzucchi SE, Krumholz HM, Masoudi FA, Goyal A, Xiao L, et al. Glucose normalization and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(5):438–46.CrossRef Kosiborod M, Inzucchi SE, Krumholz HM, Masoudi FA, Goyal A, Xiao L, et al. Glucose normalization and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(5):438–46.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nice-Sugar Study Investigators, Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, Blair D, Foster D, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1283–97.CrossRef Nice-Sugar Study Investigators, Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, Blair D, Foster D, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1283–97.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference De La Rosa GC, Donado JH, Restrepo AH, Quintero AM, Gonzalez LG, Saldarriaga NE, et al. Strict glycaemic control in patients hospitalised in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit: a randomised clinical trial. Crit Care. 2008;12(5):R120.CrossRef De La Rosa GC, Donado JH, Restrepo AH, Quintero AM, Gonzalez LG, Saldarriaga NE, et al. Strict glycaemic control in patients hospitalised in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit: a randomised clinical trial. Crit Care. 2008;12(5):R120.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Krinsley JS, Grover A. Severe hypoglycemia in critically ill patients: risk factors and outcomes. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(10):2262–7.CrossRef Krinsley JS, Grover A. Severe hypoglycemia in critically ill patients: risk factors and outcomes. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(10):2262–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Egi M, Bellomo R, Stachowski E, French CJ, Hart GK, Taori G, et al. Hypoglycemia and outcome in critically ill patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(3):217–24.CrossRef Egi M, Bellomo R, Stachowski E, French CJ, Hart GK, Taori G, et al. Hypoglycemia and outcome in critically ill patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(3):217–24.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nice-Sugar Study Investigators, Finfer S, Liu B, Chittock DR, Norton R, Myburgh JA, et al. Hypoglycemia and risk of death in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1108–18.CrossRef Nice-Sugar Study Investigators, Finfer S, Liu B, Chittock DR, Norton R, Myburgh JA, et al. Hypoglycemia and risk of death in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(12):1108–18.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference De Block CEM, Rogiers P, Jorens PG, Schepens T, Scuffi C, Van Gaal LF. A comparison of two insulin infusion protocols in the medical intensive care unit by continuous glucose monitoring. Ann Intensiv Care. 2016;6(1):115.CrossRef De Block CEM, Rogiers P, Jorens PG, Schepens T, Scuffi C, Van Gaal LF. A comparison of two insulin infusion protocols in the medical intensive care unit by continuous glucose monitoring. Ann Intensiv Care. 2016;6(1):115.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yamashita S, Ng E, Brommecker F, Silverberg J, Adhikari NK. Implementation of the glucommander method of adjusting insulin infusions in critically ill patients. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2011;64(5):333–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Yamashita S, Ng E, Brommecker F, Silverberg J, Adhikari NK. Implementation of the glucommander method of adjusting insulin infusions in critically ill patients. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2011;64(5):333–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Mann EA, Salinas J. The use of computer decision support systems for the critical care environment. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2009;20(3):216–9.PubMed Mann EA, Salinas J. The use of computer decision support systems for the critical care environment. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2009;20(3):216–9.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Mann EA, Jones JA, Wolf SE, Wade CE. Computer decision support software safely improves glycemic control in the burn intensive care unit: a randomized controlled clinical study. J Burn Care Res. 2011;32(2):246–55.CrossRef Mann EA, Jones JA, Wolf SE, Wade CE. Computer decision support software safely improves glycemic control in the burn intensive care unit: a randomized controlled clinical study. J Burn Care Res. 2011;32(2):246–55.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Marheineke N. Optimal control of glucose balance in ICU patients based on GlucoSafe model. Math Ind. 2014;4:3.CrossRef Marheineke N. Optimal control of glucose balance in ICU patients based on GlucoSafe model. Math Ind. 2014;4:3.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Morris AH, Orme J, Rocha BH, Holmen J, Clemmer T, Nelson N, et al. An electronic protocol for translation of research results to clinical practice: a preliminary report. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(5):802–8.CrossRef Morris AH, Orme J, Rocha BH, Holmen J, Clemmer T, Nelson N, et al. An electronic protocol for translation of research results to clinical practice: a preliminary report. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(5):802–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lanspa MJ, Krinsley JS, Hersh AM, Wilson EL, Holmen JR, Orme JF, et al. Percentage of Time in range 70 to 139 mg/dL is associated with reduced mortality among critically Ill patients receiving IV insulin infusion. Chest. 2019;156:878–86.CrossRef Lanspa MJ, Krinsley JS, Hersh AM, Wilson EL, Holmen JR, Orme JF, et al. Percentage of Time in range 70 to 139 mg/dL is associated with reduced mortality among critically Ill patients receiving IV insulin infusion. Chest. 2019;156:878–86.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Krinsley JS, Preiser JC. Time in blood glucose range 70 to 140 mg/dl %3e 80% is strongly associated with increased survival in non-diabetic critically ill adults. Crit Care. 2015;19:179.CrossRef Krinsley JS, Preiser JC. Time in blood glucose range 70 to 140 mg/dl %3e 80% is strongly associated with increased survival in non-diabetic critically ill adults. Crit Care. 2015;19:179.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Todi S, Bhattacharya M. Glycemic variability and outcome in critically ill. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18(5):285–90.CrossRef Todi S, Bhattacharya M. Glycemic variability and outcome in critically ill. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18(5):285–90.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Leopold JH, van Hooijdonk RT, Boshuizen M, Winters T, Bos LD, Abu-Hanna A, et al. Point and trend accuracy of a continuous intravenous microdialysis-based glucose-monitoring device in critically ill patients: a prospective study. Ann Intensiv Care. 2016;6(1):68.CrossRef Leopold JH, van Hooijdonk RT, Boshuizen M, Winters T, Bos LD, Abu-Hanna A, et al. Point and trend accuracy of a continuous intravenous microdialysis-based glucose-monitoring device in critically ill patients: a prospective study. Ann Intensiv Care. 2016;6(1):68.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schierenbeck F, Franco-Cereceda A, Liska J. Evaluation of a continuous blood glucose monitoring system using central venous microdialysis. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(6):1365–71.CrossRef Schierenbeck F, Franco-Cereceda A, Liska J. Evaluation of a continuous blood glucose monitoring system using central venous microdialysis. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(6):1365–71.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schierenbeck F, Franco-Cereceda A, Liska J. Accuracy of 2 different continuous glucose monitoring systems in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(1):108–16.CrossRef Schierenbeck F, Franco-Cereceda A, Liska J. Accuracy of 2 different continuous glucose monitoring systems in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(1):108–16.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference DeJournett L. Essential elements of the native glucoregulatory system, which, if appreciated, may help improve the function of glucose controllers in the intensive care unit setting. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(1):190–8.CrossRef DeJournett L. Essential elements of the native glucoregulatory system, which, if appreciated, may help improve the function of glucose controllers in the intensive care unit setting. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(1):190–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference DeJournett L, DeJournett J. In silico testing of an artificial-intelligence-based artificial pancreas designed for use in the intensive care unit setting. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10(6):1360–71.CrossRef DeJournett L, DeJournett J. In silico testing of an artificial-intelligence-based artificial pancreas designed for use in the intensive care unit setting. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10(6):1360–71.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference DeJournett J, DeJournett L. Comparative simulation study of glucose control methods designed for use in the intensive care unit setting via a novel controller scoring metric. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(6):1207–17.CrossRef DeJournett J, DeJournett L. Comparative simulation study of glucose control methods designed for use in the intensive care unit setting via a novel controller scoring metric. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(6):1207–17.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference DeJournett L. Artificial intelligence based artificial pancreas system in an animal model of stress induced hyperglycemia. Diabetes. 2016;65(Supplement 1):A259. DeJournett L. Artificial intelligence based artificial pancreas system in an animal model of stress induced hyperglycemia. Diabetes. 2016;65(Supplement 1):A259.
28.
go back to reference Gottesman I, Mandarino L, Verdonk C, Rizza R, Gerich J. Insulin increases the maximum velocity for glucose uptake without altering the Michaelis constant in man Evidence that insulin increases glucose uptake merely by providing additional transport sites. J Clin Invest. 1982;70(6):1310–4.CrossRef Gottesman I, Mandarino L, Verdonk C, Rizza R, Gerich J. Insulin increases the maximum velocity for glucose uptake without altering the Michaelis constant in man Evidence that insulin increases glucose uptake merely by providing additional transport sites. J Clin Invest. 1982;70(6):1310–4.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hersh AM, Hirshberg EL, Wilson EL, Orme JF, Morris AH, Lanspa MJ. Lower glucose target is associated with improved 30-day mortality in cardiac and cardiothoracic patients. Chest. 2018;154(5):1044–51.CrossRef Hersh AM, Hirshberg EL, Wilson EL, Orme JF, Morris AH, Lanspa MJ. Lower glucose target is associated with improved 30-day mortality in cardiac and cardiothoracic patients. Chest. 2018;154(5):1044–51.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Aragon D. Evaluation of nursing work effort and perceptions about blood glucose testing in tight glycemic control. Am J Crit Care. 2006;15(4):370–7.CrossRef Aragon D. Evaluation of nursing work effort and perceptions about blood glucose testing in tight glycemic control. Am J Crit Care. 2006;15(4):370–7.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference van Hooijdonk RT, Winters T, Fischer JC, van Dongen-Lases EC, Krinsley JS, Preiser JC, et al. Accuracy and limitations of continuous glucose monitoring using spectroscopy in critically ill patients. Ann Intensiv Care. 2014;4(1):8.CrossRef van Hooijdonk RT, Winters T, Fischer JC, van Dongen-Lases EC, Krinsley JS, Preiser JC, et al. Accuracy and limitations of continuous glucose monitoring using spectroscopy in critically ill patients. Ann Intensiv Care. 2014;4(1):8.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Preiser JC, Lheureux O, Thooft A, Brimioulle S, Goldstein J, Vincent JL. Near-continuous glucose monitoring makes glycemic control safer in ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(8):1224–9.CrossRef Preiser JC, Lheureux O, Thooft A, Brimioulle S, Goldstein J, Vincent JL. Near-continuous glucose monitoring makes glycemic control safer in ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(8):1224–9.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Bochicchio GV, Nasraway S, Moore L, Furnary A, Nohra E, Bochicchio K. Results of a multicenter prospective pivotal trial of the first inline continuous glucose monitor in critically ill patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(6):1049–54.CrossRef Bochicchio GV, Nasraway S, Moore L, Furnary A, Nohra E, Bochicchio K. Results of a multicenter prospective pivotal trial of the first inline continuous glucose monitor in critically ill patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(6):1049–54.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Foubert LA, Lecomte PV, Nobels FR, Gulino AM, De Decker KH. Accuracy of a feasibility version of an intravenous continuous glucose monitor in volunteers with diabetes and hospitalized patients. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(12):858–66.CrossRef Foubert LA, Lecomte PV, Nobels FR, Gulino AM, De Decker KH. Accuracy of a feasibility version of an intravenous continuous glucose monitor in volunteers with diabetes and hospitalized patients. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(12):858–66.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Frey AM. Drawing blood samples from vascular access devices: evidence-based practice. J Infus Nurs. 2003;26(5):285–93.CrossRef Frey AM. Drawing blood samples from vascular access devices: evidence-based practice. J Infus Nurs. 2003;26(5):285–93.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Trerotola SO, Stavropoulos SW, Mondschein JI, Patel AA, Fishman N, Fuchs B, et al. Triple-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter in patients in the critical care unit: prospective evaluation. Radiology. 2010;256(1):312–20.CrossRef Trerotola SO, Stavropoulos SW, Mondschein JI, Patel AA, Fishman N, Fuchs B, et al. Triple-lumen peripherally inserted central catheter in patients in the critical care unit: prospective evaluation. Radiology. 2010;256(1):312–20.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wall C, Moore J, Thachil J. Catheter-related thrombosis: a practical approach. J Intensiv Care Soc. 2016;17(2):160–7.CrossRef Wall C, Moore J, Thachil J. Catheter-related thrombosis: a practical approach. J Intensiv Care Soc. 2016;17(2):160–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Performance of a closed-loop glucose control system, comprising a continuous glucose monitoring system and an AI-based controller in swine during severe hypo- and hyperglycemic provocations
Authors
Jeremy DeJournett
Michael Nekludov
Leon DeJournett
Mats Wallin
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00474-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2/2021 Go to the issue