Published in:
Open Access
28-11-2022 | Antibiotic | Correspondence
Decontamination regimens: do not forget half of the protocol. Author's reply
Authors:
Josef Briegel, Wolfgang A. Krueger, Baocheng Wang, Ludwig Christian Hinske, Beatrice Grabein
Published in:
Intensive Care Medicine
|
Issue 1/2023
Login to get access
Excerpt
We thank our colleagues for their critical comments, which give us the opportunity to point out the study methods in some more details [
1,
2]. First, it is correct that the resistance rates of some multi-drug resistant bacteria (MDRB) differed between groups with and without selective oral decontamination (SOD) already at admission (first 48 h). Importantly, these findings were excluded from the analysis. The objective of the study was to specifically investigate the emergence of MDRB due to selection pressure of SOD in the intensive care unit (ICU). Second, the incidence densities in MDRB are reported as we found them. Clinically important differences in patient characteristics (medical or surgical admission, transplantation, Table 1 in [
1]) are not taken into account since the effectiveness of SOD is not modified by the type of ICU admission [
3]. Third, the outcome analysis on health care infections and in-hospital death, however, was done after propensity score analysis which was based on seven clinically important variables (Table 2 in [
1]). This gave us the opportunity to compare two well balanced groups, especially with respect to type of admission, severity of illness, duration of ventilation and length of stay in the ICU. The effect of propensity score matching on hospital death rate is illustrated in Table 7 of our publication [
1]. Of note, the death rates found in the groups after propensity score matching were very similar to those in recent clinical trials [
1,
4,
5]. Fourth, we believe that the inclusion of length of stay in the propensity score analysis is a strength of our study, as it generates two homogeneous groups with respect to length of exposure at risk between these groups. From this point of view, it is also justified to compare incidence rates of these two groups. Fifth, as detailed in the methods the protocols for infection control were investigated in all participating ICUs according to guidelines given by a national group of experts of the Robert-Koch-Institut in Berlin, Germany. Quality assurance measures showed strict adherence to recommendations in all ICUs included in our analysis. …