Published in:
10-05-2023 | ANKLE
Arthroscopic modified Broström procedure achieved similar favorable short term outcomes to open procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability cases with generalized joint laxity
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 9/2023
Login to get accessAbstract
Purpose
To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of the open versus arthroscopic modified Broström procedure in generalized joint laxity (GJL) patients.
Methods
From January 2018 to January 2020, 64 consecutive patients with chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) and GJL (Beighton score ≥ 4) were prospectively enrolled into two groups: those who underwent the open modified Broström procedure (open group, n = 32) and those who underwent the arthroscopic modified Broström procedure (arthroscopic group, n = 32). Patients underwent an open or arthroscopic modified Broström procedure based on the time when they attended the clinic for consultation. All patients were followed-up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Karlsson score, and the radiographic outcomes were assessed using stress radiography at 24 months postoperatively. The time to return to work and the failure rate were also evaluated and compared.
Results
Follow-up was completed for 31 patients in the open group and 30 patients in the arthroscopic group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, Beighton score (6.2 ± 1.9 vs. 5.5 ± 1.4, n.s.), or duration of symptoms. There were no significant differences in the functional scores before surgery and at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively or in the mean anterior translation of the talus and talar tilt angle on stress radiography at 24 months postoperatively between the open and arthroscopic groups. Compared to the open group, the arthroscopic group showed a significantly earlier return to work (6.8 ± 2.1 vs. 8.1 ± 2.4 weeks, p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in terms of the failure rate between the open and arthroscopic groups (16.1% vs. 23.3%, n.s.).
Conclusion
Arthroscopic modified Broström procedure achieved similar short-term outcomes to the open procedure for GJL patients. Arthroscopic modified Broström procedure showed an earlier return to work than the open modified Broström procedure and was an alternative to open surgery for CLAI patients with GJL.
Level of evidence
III.
Clinical trial registration
This study is a prospective study NCT05284188.