Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Shoulder

Arthroscopic knotless-anchor rotator cuff repair: a clinical and radiological evaluation

Authors: Konstantin Hug, Christian Gerhardt, Hendrik Haneveld, Markus Scheibel

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 9/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of the arthroscopic knotless-anchor Speed-Bridge technique, in particular the pattern and the rate of retears. The results were compared with a modified Suture-Bridge knot-tying technique (mDR). The hypothesis is that arthroscopic knotless-anchor Speed-Bridge rotator cuff repair is a sufficient technique to address supraspinatus tears and differs in pattern of retears when compared to mDR.

Methods

This study includes twenty-two consecutive patients (8f/14m ø 63.3 ± 7.2 years) undergoing knotless-anchor Speed-Bridge repair. The subjective shoulder value (SSV), Constant score (CS) and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Score were used for clinical follow-up. MRI scans were conducted within 3 weeks post-operatively, after 1 and after 2 years for analysis of (a) tendon integrity (according to Sugaya), (b) muscle atrophy according to Thomazeau and (c) fatty infiltration. Results were compared with 20 patients operated in mDR (ø 61.2 ± 7.5 years).

Results

The mean follow-up was 24.4 ± 4.7 months. The average SSV was 88.7 ± 14.9 %, the CS was 78.2 ± 13.2 points (contralateral side 78.5 ± 16.6) and the WORC Score averaged 87.1 ± 18.2 %. On magnetic resonance imaging, the integrity failure rate was 22.7 % (n = 5). The pattern of retear was a medial cuff failure in 2/5 cases (mDR 4/5, n.s.). Muscular atrophy or fatty degeneration did not increase between surgery and follow-up (n.s.). Compared with mDR (25 %) reconstruction, no significant differences were obtained regarding integrity failure rate and muscular atrophy (n.s.).

Conclusion

The modified knotless-anchor Speed-Bridge technique shows good to excellent clinical results as well as acceptable retear rates. This technique eliminates medial and lateral knot impingement. Concerning the potential reduction in the medial strangulation of the tendon, there is a need for further clinical research.

Level of evidence

III.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anderl W, Heuberer PR, Laky B, Kriegleder B, Reihsner R, Eberhardsteiner J (2012) Superiority of bridging techniques with medial fixation on initial strength. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2559–2566CrossRefPubMed Anderl W, Heuberer PR, Laky B, Kriegleder B, Reihsner R, Eberhardsteiner J (2012) Superiority of bridging techniques with medial fixation on initial strength. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2559–2566CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Aydin N, Kocaoglu B, Guven O (2010) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in small- to medium-sized tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:722–725CrossRefPubMed Aydin N, Kocaoglu B, Guven O (2010) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in small- to medium-sized tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:722–725CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo IK, Bird J, Gladstone JN, Flatow EL (2006) Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:290–299CrossRefPubMed Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo IK, Bird J, Gladstone JN, Flatow EL (2006) Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:290–299CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Brown BS, Cooper AD, McIff TE, Key VH, Toby EB (2008) Initial fixation and cyclic loading stability of knotless suture anchors for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:313–318CrossRefPubMed Brown BS, Cooper AD, McIff TE, Key VH, Toby EB (2008) Initial fixation and cyclic loading stability of knotless suture anchors for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:313–318CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Buess E, Waibl B, Vogel R, Seidner R (2009) A comparative clinical evaluation of arthroscopic single-row versus double-row supraspinatus tendon repair. Acta Orthop Belg 75:588–594PubMed Buess E, Waibl B, Vogel R, Seidner R (2009) A comparative clinical evaluation of arthroscopic single-row versus double-row supraspinatus tendon repair. Acta Orthop Belg 75:588–594PubMed
6.
go back to reference Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG (2010) Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 38:664–671CrossRefPubMed Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG (2010) Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 38:664–671CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chu T, McDonald E, Tufaga M, Kandemir U, Buckley J, Ma CB (2011) Comparison of completely knotless and hybrid double-row fixation systems: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 27:479–485CrossRefPubMed Chu T, McDonald E, Tufaga M, Kandemir U, Buckley J, Ma CB (2011) Comparison of completely knotless and hybrid double-row fixation systems: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 27:479–485CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cole BJ, ElAttrache NS, Anbari A (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations. Arthroscopy 23:662–669CrossRefPubMed Cole BJ, ElAttrache NS, Anbari A (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an anatomic and biomechanical rationale for different suture-anchor repair configurations. Arthroscopy 23:662–669CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed
10.
go back to reference Cummins CA, Murrell GA (2003) Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:128–133CrossRefPubMed Cummins CA, Murrell GA (2003) Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:128–133CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Frank JB, ElAttrache NS, Dines JS, Blackburn A, Crues J, Tibone JE (2008) Repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 36:1496–1503CrossRefPubMed Frank JB, ElAttrache NS, Dines JS, Blackburn A, Crues J, Tibone JE (2008) Repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 36:1496–1503CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gerhardt C, Hug K, Pauly S, Marnitz T, Scheibel M (2012) Arthroscopic single-row modified mason-allen repair versus double-row suture bridge reconstruction for supraspinatus tendon tears: a matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med 40:2777–2785CrossRefPubMed Gerhardt C, Hug K, Pauly S, Marnitz T, Scheibel M (2012) Arthroscopic single-row modified mason-allen repair versus double-row suture bridge reconstruction for supraspinatus tendon tears: a matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med 40:2777–2785CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gilbart MK, Gerber C (2007) Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:717–721CrossRefPubMed Gilbart MK, Gerber C (2007) Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the Constant score. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:717–721CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M, Falcone G, Deriu L, Fabbriciani C (2009) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy 25:4–12CrossRefPubMed Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M, Falcone G, Deriu L, Fabbriciani C (2009) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy 25:4–12CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Huber W, Hofstaetter JG, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Posch M, Wurnig C (2005) Translation and psychometric testing of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) for use in Germany. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:453–460CrossRefPubMed Huber W, Hofstaetter JG, Hanslik-Schnabel B, Posch M, Wurnig C (2005) Translation and psychometric testing of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) for use in Germany. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:453–460CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, Lee TQ (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34:407–414CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, Lee TQ (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34:407–414CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lapner PL, Sabri E, Rakhra K, McRae S, Leiter J, Bell K, Macdonald P (2012) A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing single-row with double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1249–1257CrossRefPubMed Lapner PL, Sabri E, Rakhra K, McRae S, Leiter J, Bell K, Macdonald P (2012) A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing single-row with double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1249–1257CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Liem D, Schmidt C, Vogler T, Dedy N (2011) Single row, double row, or transosseous repair. Biomechanical and clinical data. Obere Extremität 6:11–18CrossRef Liem D, Schmidt C, Vogler T, Dedy N (2011) Single row, double row, or transosseous repair. Biomechanical and clinical data. Obere Extremität 6:11–18CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lorbach O, Bachelier F, Vees J, Kohn D, Pape D (2008) Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair. Am J Sports Med 36:1504–1510CrossRefPubMed Lorbach O, Bachelier F, Vees J, Kohn D, Pape D (2008) Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair. Am J Sports Med 36:1504–1510CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:403–410CrossRefPubMed Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:403–410CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33:1861–1868CrossRefPubMed Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33:1861–1868CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 22:1168–1173CrossRefPubMed Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 22:1168–1173CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Milano G, Grasso A, Zarelli D, Deriu L, Cillo M, Fabbriciani C (2008) Comparison between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:75–80CrossRefPubMed Milano G, Grasso A, Zarelli D, Deriu L, Cillo M, Fabbriciani C (2008) Comparison between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:75–80CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Park MC, Elattrache NS, Ahmad CS, Tibone JE (2006) “Transosseous-equivalent” rotator cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy 22:e1–e5 Park MC, Elattrache NS, Ahmad CS, Tibone JE (2006) “Transosseous-equivalent” rotator cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy 22:e1–e5
25.
go back to reference Pauly S, Gerhardt C, Chen J, Scheibel M (2010) Single versus double-row repair of the rotator cuff: does double-row repair with improved anatomical and biomechanical characteristics lead to better clinical outcome? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1718–1729CrossRefPubMed Pauly S, Gerhardt C, Chen J, Scheibel M (2010) Single versus double-row repair of the rotator cuff: does double-row repair with improved anatomical and biomechanical characteristics lead to better clinical outcome? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1718–1729CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Pauly S, Kieser B, Schill A, Gerhardt C, Scheibel M (2010) Biomechanical comparison of 4 double-row suture-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques using different medial-row configurations. Arthroscopy 26:1281–1288CrossRefPubMed Pauly S, Kieser B, Schill A, Gerhardt C, Scheibel M (2010) Biomechanical comparison of 4 double-row suture-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques using different medial-row configurations. Arthroscopy 26:1281–1288CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pauly S, Fiebig D, Kieser B, Albrecht B, Schill A, Scheibel M (2011) Biomechanical comparison of four double-row speed-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques with or without medial or lateral row enhancement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(12):2090–2097 Pauly S, Fiebig D, Kieser B, Albrecht B, Schill A, Scheibel M (2011) Biomechanical comparison of four double-row speed-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques with or without medial or lateral row enhancement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(12):2090–2097
28.
go back to reference Pennington WT, Gibbons DJ, Bartz BA, Dodd M, Daun J, Klinger J, Popovich M, Butler B (2010) Comparative analysis of single-row versus double-row repair of rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 26:1419–1426CrossRefPubMed Pennington WT, Gibbons DJ, Bartz BA, Dodd M, Daun J, Klinger J, Popovich M, Butler B (2010) Comparative analysis of single-row versus double-row repair of rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 26:1419–1426CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Redziniak DE, Hart J, Turman K, Treme G, Lunardini D, Miller MD, Diduch DR (2009) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the Opus knotless suture anchor fixation system. Am J Sports Med 37:1106–1110CrossRefPubMed Redziniak DE, Hart J, Turman K, Treme G, Lunardini D, Miller MD, Diduch DR (2009) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the Opus knotless suture anchor fixation system. Am J Sports Med 37:1106–1110CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Rhee YG, Cho NS, Parke CS (2012) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using modified mason-allen medial row stitch: knotless versus knot-tying suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 40:2440–2447CrossRefPubMed Rhee YG, Cho NS, Parke CS (2012) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using modified mason-allen medial row stitch: knotless versus knot-tying suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med 40:2440–2447CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Scheibel M (2012) Recurrent defects of the rotary cuff: causes and therapeutic strategies. Oper Orthop Traumatol 24:458–467CrossRefPubMed Scheibel M (2012) Recurrent defects of the rotary cuff: causes and therapeutic strategies. Oper Orthop Traumatol 24:458–467CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Smith CD, Alexander S, Hill AM, Huijsmans PE, Bull AM, Amis AA, De Beer JF, Wallace AL (2006) A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2425–2431CrossRefPubMed Smith CD, Alexander S, Hill AM, Huijsmans PE, Bull AM, Amis AA, De Beer JF, Wallace AL (2006) A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2425–2431CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2005) Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 21:1307–1316CrossRefPubMed Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2005) Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 21:1307–1316CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Thomazeau H, Rolland Y, Lucas C, Duval JM, Langlais F (1996) Atrophy of the supraspinatus belly. Assessment by MRI in 55 patients with rotator cuff pathology. Acta Orthop Scand 67:264–268CrossRefPubMed Thomazeau H, Rolland Y, Lucas C, Duval JM, Langlais F (1996) Atrophy of the supraspinatus belly. Assessment by MRI in 55 patients with rotator cuff pathology. Acta Orthop Scand 67:264–268CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K, Lo IK (2008) Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 24:727–731CrossRefPubMed Trantalis JN, Boorman RS, Pletsch K, Lo IK (2008) Medial rotator cuff failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 24:727–731CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Vaishnav S, Millett PJ (2010) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: scientific rationale, surgical technique, and early clinical and functional results of a knotless self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair system. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(2 Suppl):83–90CrossRefPubMed Vaishnav S, Millett PJ (2010) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: scientific rationale, surgical technique, and early clinical and functional results of a knotless self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair system. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(2 Suppl):83–90CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Yamakado K, Katsuo S, Mizuno K, Arakawa H, Hayashi S (2010) Medial-row failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 26:430–435CrossRefPubMed Yamakado K, Katsuo S, Mizuno K, Arakawa H, Hayashi S (2010) Medial-row failure after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 26:430–435CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Arthroscopic knotless-anchor rotator cuff repair: a clinical and radiological evaluation
Authors
Konstantin Hug
Christian Gerhardt
Hendrik Haneveld
Markus Scheibel
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3026-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2015

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 9/2015 Go to the issue