Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

Are there still east-to-west differences in the incidence of hip fractures in Germany?

Authors: Alexander Defèr, Hans-Christof Schober, Werner Möhrke, Klaus Abendroth, Lorenz C Hofbauer, From the Task Group for Treatment Research at the German Society of Osteology, Federal Association of German Osteologists (Bundesverband der Osteologen Deutschland e.V.) and the Regional Committee of Experts on Osteoporosis (Regionaler Expertenkreis Osteoporose (REKO) Deutschland e.V.)

Published in: Archives of Osteoporosis | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

There are large regional differences in the incidence of hip fracture in Germany. These differences were unexpected and do not follow a north-to-south or an east-to-west gradient. But they are of high socioeconomic importance and cannot be explained by geographic location, the age structure of the population, and only to a small extent by the regulation of specific medication.

Introduction

The most important complications and the major cost factors of osteoporosis are fractures. In order to develop strategies for fracture prevention, knowledge about different incidence rates and possible causes is necessary.

Methods

In order to detect persistent differences in the incidence of hip fractures between the former eastern and western states of Germany, structured diagnostic data of patients hospitalized between 2000 and 2011 were used to determine the regional incidence of hip fractures in the individual federal states of Germany. To account for error due to repeated admissions and double registrations, the frequency of fractures was corrected by a factor of 0.89.

Results

Our analysis of the 10-year period from 2000 to 2011 did not confirm the difference between eastern and western Germany reported in the national literature, or the north-south gradient for Germany as reported in several European publications. We found significant differences in the incidence of fractures in adjacent territorial states such as Schleswig-Holstein and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania or Saxony and Thuringia. Particularly, high incidence rates over the entire period were noted in the city-states of Hamburg, Berlin, and Bremen.

Conclusion

The reason for such differences is still unclear and, thus, the consequences of urbanization must be considered to explain diverse incidence rates. In general, the investigation of causes should be based on the use of a multivariate model that takes additional factors such as specific drug use, socioeconomic aspects, environmental aspects, education, and health care into account. There are large regional differences in the incidence of hip fracture in Germany. These differences were unexpected and do not follow a north-to-south or an east-to-west gradient. But they are of high socioeconomic importance and cannot be explained by geographic location, the age structure of the population and only to a small extent by the regulation of specific medication.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wildner M, Clark DE (2001) Hip fracture incidence in East and West Germany: reassessment ten years after unification. Osteoporos Int 12:136–139PubMedCrossRef Wildner M, Clark DE (2001) Hip fracture incidence in East and West Germany: reassessment ten years after unification. Osteoporos Int 12:136–139PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M, Becker C, Meyer G (2008) Inzidenz von Hüftfrakturen in Deutschland—Auswertung der Krankenhausdiagnosestatistik 2004. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 133:125–128PubMedCrossRef Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M, Becker C, Meyer G (2008) Inzidenz von Hüftfrakturen in Deutschland—Auswertung der Krankenhausdiagnosestatistik 2004. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 133:125–128PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M, Becker C, Meyer G (2008) Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995–2004: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 19:1139–1145PubMedCrossRef Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M, Becker C, Meyer G (2008) Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995–2004: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 19:1139–1145PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Defèr A, Möhrke W, Abendroth K (2010) Entwicklung der Inzidenz der Hüftfrakturen von 2000 bis 2007 in Deutschland Osteologie. 19(Suppl.1):S49 Defèr A, Möhrke W, Abendroth K (2010) Entwicklung der Inzidenz der Hüftfrakturen von 2000 bis 2007 in Deutschland Osteologie. 19(Suppl.1):S49
5.
go back to reference Defèr A, Möhrke W, Abendroth K Differente Entwicklung proximaler Hüftfrakturen in den Bundesländern Deutschlands von 2000 bis 2007—Versorgungsforschung in der Osteologie Med Report 34:2010 Seite 34 Defèr A, Möhrke W, Abendroth K Differente Entwicklung proximaler Hüftfrakturen in den Bundesländern Deutschlands von 2000 bis 2007—Versorgungsforschung in der Osteologie Med Report 34:2010 Seite 34
6.
go back to reference Diagnosedaten der Krankenhäuser ab 2000. Gliederungsmerkmale: Jahre, Wohnsitz, Alter, Geschlecht, Verweildauer. www.gbe-bund.de (last accessed on 21 February 2013) Diagnosedaten der Krankenhäuser ab 2000. Gliederungsmerkmale: Jahre, Wohnsitz, Alter, Geschlecht, Verweildauer. www.​gbe-bund.​de (last accessed on 21 February 2013)
7.
go back to reference Bevölkerung im Jahresdurchschnitt. (Primärquelle: Statistisches Bundesamt, Fortschreibung des Bevölkerungsstandes). www.gbe-bund.de (Thematische Recherche: Bevölkerung im Jahresdurchschnitt. Gliederungsmerkmale: Jahre, Region, Alter, Geschlecht). (Last accessed on 21 February 2013) Bevölkerung im Jahresdurchschnitt. (Primärquelle: Statistisches Bundesamt, Fortschreibung des Bevölkerungsstandes). www.​gbe-bund.​de (Thematische Recherche: Bevölkerung im Jahresdurchschnitt. Gliederungsmerkmale: Jahre, Region, Alter, Geschlecht). (Last accessed on 21 February 2013)
8.
go back to reference Dobson AJ, Kuulasmaa K, Eberle E, Scherer J (1991) Confidence intervals for weighted sums of Poisson parameters. Stat Med 10:457–462PubMedCrossRef Dobson AJ, Kuulasmaa K, Eberle E, Scherer J (1991) Confidence intervals for weighted sums of Poisson parameters. Stat Med 10:457–462PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hoffmann F, Glaeske G (2006) Inzidenz proximaler Femurfrakturen in Deutschland Personenbezogene Analyse einer Versichertenpopulation. Gesundheitswesen 68:161–164PubMedCrossRef Hoffmann F, Glaeske G (2006) Inzidenz proximaler Femurfrakturen in Deutschland Personenbezogene Analyse einer Versichertenpopulation. Gesundheitswesen 68:161–164PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bäßgen K, Westphal T, Haar P, Kundt G, Mittelmeier T, Schober HC (2013) Population-based prospective study on the incidence of osteoporosis-associated fractures in a German population of 200,413 inhabitants. J Public Health 35:255–61CrossRef Bäßgen K, Westphal T, Haar P, Kundt G, Mittelmeier T, Schober HC (2013) Population-based prospective study on the incidence of osteoporosis-associated fractures in a German population of 200,413 inhabitants. J Public Health 35:255–61CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden, Destatis 2011 Fachserie 3, Reihe 5.1 Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden, Destatis 2011 Fachserie 3, Reihe 5.1
12.
go back to reference Hinton RY, Lennox DW, Ebert FR, Jacobsen SJ, Smith GS (1995) Relative rates of fracture of the hip in the United States. Geographic, sex, and age variations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:695–702PubMed Hinton RY, Lennox DW, Ebert FR, Jacobsen SJ, Smith GS (1995) Relative rates of fracture of the hip in the United States. Geographic, sex, and age variations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:695–702PubMed
13.
go back to reference Karagas MR, Lu-Yao GL, Barrett JA, Beach ML, Baron JA (1996) Heterogeneity of hip fracture: age, race, sex, and geographic patterns of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol 143:677–682PubMedCrossRef Karagas MR, Lu-Yao GL, Barrett JA, Beach ML, Baron JA (1996) Heterogeneity of hip fracture: age, race, sex, and geographic patterns of femoral neck and trochanteric fractures among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol 143:677–682PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Barbier S, Ecochard R, Schott A-M, Colin C, Delmas PD, Jaglal B, Couris C (2009) Geographical variations in hip fracture risk for women: strong effects hidden in standardised ratios. Osteoporos Int 20:371–377 Barbier S, Ecochard R, Schott A-M, Colin C, Delmas PD, Jaglal B, Couris C (2009) Geographical variations in hip fracture risk for women: strong effects hidden in standardised ratios. Osteoporos Int 20:371–377
15.
go back to reference De Pina MF, Alves SM, Barbosa M, Barros H (2008) Hip fractures cluster in space: an epidemiological analysis in Portugal. Osteoporos Int 19:1797–1804PubMedCrossRef De Pina MF, Alves SM, Barbosa M, Barros H (2008) Hip fractures cluster in space: an epidemiological analysis in Portugal. Osteoporos Int 19:1797–1804PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Alvarez-Nebreda ML, Jiménez Ana B, Rodríguez P, Serra JA (2008) Epidemiology of hip fracture in the elderly in Spain. Bone 42:278–285PubMedCrossRef Alvarez-Nebreda ML, Jiménez Ana B, Rodríguez P, Serra JA (2008) Epidemiology of hip fracture in the elderly in Spain. Bone 42:278–285PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M, Becker C, Rapp K, Dragano N et al (2009) Hip fractures and area level socioeconomic conditions: a population-based study. BMC Public Health 9:114PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M, Becker C, Rapp K, Dragano N et al (2009) Hip fractures and area level socioeconomic conditions: a population-based study. BMC Public Health 9:114PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Are there still east-to-west differences in the incidence of hip fractures in Germany?
Authors
Alexander Defèr
Hans-Christof Schober
Werner Möhrke
Klaus Abendroth
Lorenz C Hofbauer
From the Task Group for Treatment Research at the German Society of Osteology, Federal Association of German Osteologists (Bundesverband der Osteologen Deutschland e.V.) and the Regional Committee of Experts on Osteoporosis (Regionaler Expertenkreis Osteoporose (REKO) Deutschland e.V.)
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Archives of Osteoporosis / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1862-3522
Electronic ISSN: 1862-3514
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-014-0195-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Archives of Osteoporosis 1/2014 Go to the issue