Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Globalization and Health
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Review

Approaches towards improving the quality of maternal and newborn health services in South Asia: challenges and opportunities for healthcare systems

Authors: Naeem uddin Mian, Muhammad Adeel Alvi, Mariam Zahid Malik, Sarosh Iqbal, Rubeena Zakar, Muhammad Zakria Zakar, Shehzad Hussain Awan, Faryal Shahid, Muhammad Ashraf Chaudhry, Florian Fischer

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

South Asia is experiencing a dismal state of maternal and newborn health (MNH) as the region has been falling behind in reducing the levels of maternal and neonatal mortality. Most of the efforts are focused on enhancing coverage of MNH services; however, quality remains a serious concern if the region is to achieve expected outcomes in terms of standardised MNH services within healthcare delivery systems. This research consists of a review of South Asian quality improvement (QI) approaches/interventions, specifically implemented for MNH improvement.

Methods

A literature review of QI approaches/interventions was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Online databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, were searched. Primary studies published between 1998 and 2013 were considered. Studies were initially screened and selected based upon the selection criteria for data extraction. A thematic synthesis/analysis was performed to organise, group and interpret the key findings according to prominent themes.

Results

Thirty studies from six South Asian countries were included in the review. Findings from these selected studies were grouped under eight broad, cross-cutting themes, which emerged from a deductive approach, representing the most commonly employed QI approaches for improving MNH services within different geographical settings. These consist of capacity building of healthcare providers on clinical quality, clinical audits and feedback, financial incentives to beneficiaries, pay-for-performance, supportive supervision, community engagement, collaborative efforts and multidimensional interventions.

Conclusions

Employing and documenting QI approaches is essential in order to measure the potential of an intervention, considering its cost-effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability to communities. This research concluded that QI approaches are very diverse and cross-cutting, because they are subject to the varied requirements of regional health systems. This high level of variability leads to implementation and knowledge-management challenges for MNH programme planners and managers in the countries of the South Asia region.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Haté V, Gannon S. Public health in South Asia: a report of the CSIS Global Health policy center. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies; 2010.
2.
WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
3.
WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank. Trends in child mortality: 1990 to 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
4.
Leatherman S, Sutherland K. Quality of care in the NHS of England. BMJ. 2004;328:288–90.CrossRef
5.
Grimmer K, Sheppard L, Pitt M, Magarey M, Trott P. Differences in stakeholder expectations in the outcome of physiotherapy management of acute low back pain. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999;11:155–62.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Dawda P, Jenkins R, Varnam R. Quality improvement in general practice. Discussion paper. London: The King’s Fund; 2010.
7.
Kerssens JJ, Groenewegen PP, Sixma HJ, Boerma WW, van der Eijk I. Comparison of patient evaluations of health care quality in relation to WHO measures of achievement in 12 European countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(2):106–15.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Pitroff R, Campbell O. Quality of maternity care: silver bullet or red herring? London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2000.
9.
Bruce J. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plan. 1990;21(2):61–91.CrossRef
10.
11.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Open Med. 2009;3(3):123–30.
12.
WHO. How quality improvement in health care can help to achieve the millennium development goals. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(4):257–336.
13.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Quality Improvement. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.
14.
Lucas PJ, Baird J, Arai L, Law C, Roberts HM. Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Jokhio AH, Winter HR, Cheng KK. An intervention involving traditional birth attendants and perinatal and maternal mortality in Pakistan. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(20):2091–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Bhutta ZA, Memon ZA, Soofi S, Salat MS, Cousens S, Martines J. Implementing community-based perinatal care: results from a pilot study in rural Pakistan. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(6):452–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Goodburn EA, Chowdhury M, Gazi R, Marshall T, Graham W. Training traditional birth attendants in clean delivery does not prevent postpartum infection. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15:394–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Barua A, Waghmare R, Venkiteswaran S. Implementing reproductive and child health services in rural Maharashtra, India: a pragmatic approach. Reprod Health Matters. 2003;11:140–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Senarath U, Fernando DN, Rodrigo I. Effect of training for care providers on practice of essential newborn care in hospitals in Sri Lanka. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2007;36:531–41.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Arifeen SE, Hoque DME, Akter T, Rahman M, Hoque ME, Begum K, Chowdhury EK, Khan R, Blum LS, Ahmed S, Hossain MA, Siddik A, Begum N, Sadeq-ur Rahman Q, Haque TM, Billah SM, Islam M, Rumi RA, Law E, Al-Helal ZA, Baqui AH, Schellenberg J, Adam T, Moulton LH, Habicht JP, Scherpbier RW, Victora CG, Bryce J, Black RE. Effect of the integrated management of childhood illness strategy on childhood mortality and nutrition in a rural area in Bangladesh: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2009;374:393–400.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Tholpadi S, Sudhindra B, Bhutani V. Neonatal resuscitation program in rural Kerela India to reduce infant mortality attributed to perinatal asphyxia. J Perinatol. 2000;20:46.CrossRef
22.
Mufti P, Setna F, Nazir K. Early neonatal mortality: effects of interventions on survival of low birth babies weighing 1000-2000g. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56(4):174–6.PubMed
23.
NHS Trust. Improving Patient Care through Clinical Audit – A How to Do Guide. Dartforf: Dartford and Gravesham, NHS Trust; 2017.
24.
Chowdhury EK, El Arifeen S, Rahman M, Hoque DE, Hossain MA, Begum K, Siddik A, Begum N, Sadeq-ur Rahman Q, Akter T, Haque TM, Al-Helal ZM, Baqui AH, Bryce J, Black RE. Care at first-level facilities for children with severe pneumonia in Bangladesh: a cohort study. Lancet. 2008;372:822. J Pak Med Assoc 30CrossRefPubMed
25.
Khan MMR, Hotchkiss D, Dmytraczenko T, Zunaid AK. Use of a balanced scorecard in strengthening health systems in developing countries: an analysis based on nationally representative Bangladesh health facility survey. Int J Health Plann Mgmt. 2013;28:202–15.CrossRef
26.
Witter S, Khadka S, Nath H, Triwari S. The national free delivery policy in Nepal: early evidence of its effects on health facilities. Health Policy Plan. 2011;26(Suppl. 2):ii84–91.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Eichler R, Agarwal K, Askew I, Iriarte E, Morgan L, Watson J. Performance-based incentives to improve health status of mothers and newborns: what does the evidence show? J Health Popul Nutr. 2013;31(4 Suppl. 2):36–47.PubMed
28.
Bellows BW, Conlon CM, Higgs ES, Townsend JW, Nahed MG, Cavanaugh K, Grainger CG, Okal J, Gorter AC. A taxonomy and results from a comprehensive review of 28 maternal health voucher programmes. J Health Popul Nutr. 2013;31(4 Suppl. 2):106–28.PubMed
29.
Paul V, Sanchez H, Mavalankar D, Ramachandran P, Sankar M, Bhandari N, Sreenivas V, Sundararaman T, Govil D, Osrin D, Kirkwood B. Reproductive health, and child health and nutrition in India: meeting the challenge. Lancet. 2011;377(9762):332–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Lim S, Dandona L, Hoisington J, James S, Hogan M, Gakidou E. India’s Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. Lancet. 2010;375(9730):5–11.CrossRef
31.
UNICEF. Innovative approaches to maternal and newborn health. Compendium of case studies. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2013.
32.
Marquez L, Kean L. Making supervision supportive and sustainable: new approaches to old problems, maximizing access and quality initiative. MAQ paper no. 4 2002. Washington, DC: USAID; 2002.
33.
Ahmed SM. Taking healthcare where the community is: the story of the Shasthya Sebikas of BRAC in Bangladesh. BRAC University J. 2008;1:39–45.
34.
Ahmed F. Community empowerment through micro-finance to improve community health: BRAC’s experience in Bangladesh. 6–8 August 2008. WHO/SEARO Regional Conference on Revitalizing Primary Health Care. Jakarta: WHO/SEAR; 2008.
35.
36.
Dongre AR, Deshmukh PR, Garg BS. A community-based approach to improve health care seeking for newborn danger signs in rural Wardha, India. Indian J Pediatr. 2009;76:45–50.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Mcpherson RA, Khadka N, Moore JM, Sharma M. Are birth-preparedness programmes effective? Results from a field trial in Siraha district, Nepal. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006;24:479–88.PubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Fottrell E, Azad K, Kuddus A, Younes L, Shaha S, Nahar T, Aumon BH, Hossen M, Beard J, Hossain T, Pulkki-Brannstrom AM, Skordis-Worrall J, Prost A, Costello A, Houweling TA. The effect of increased coverage of participatory women's groups on neonatal mortality in Bangladesh: a cluster randomized trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(9):816–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Darmstadt GL, Choi Y, Arifeen SE, Bari S, Rahman SM, Mannan I, Seraji HR, Winch PJ, Saha SK, Ahmed AS, Ahmed S, Begum N, Lee AC, Black RE, Santosham M, Crook D, Baqui AH, Bangladesh Projahnmo-2 Mirzapur Study Group. Evaluation of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a package of community-based maternal and newborn interventions in Mirzapur, Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Azad K, Barnett S, Banerjee B, Shaha S, Khan K, Rega AR, Barua S, Flatman D, Pagel C, Prost A, Costello A. The effect of scaling up women's groups on birth outcomes in three rural districts of Bangladesh: a cluster- randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;475:1193–202.CrossRef
41.
Saeed GA, Fakhar S, Rahim F, Tabassum S. Change in trend of contraceptive uptake – effect of educational leaflets and counselling. Contraception. 2008;77(5):377–81.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Bolam A, Manandhar DS, Shrestha P, Ellis M, Costello AM. The effects of postnatal health education for mothers on infant care and family planning practices in Nepal: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1998;316:805–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Sebastian MP, Khan ME, Kumari K, Idnani R. Increasing postpartum contraception in rural India: evaluation of a community-based behaviour change communication intervention. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;38(2):68–77.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Paiman. Review of public private partnerships models. Islamabad: Pakistan Initiative for Mothers and Newborns; 2006.
45.
Midhet F. Final report – safe motherhood initiative in rural Balochistan. Karachi: The Asia Foundation; 1998.
46.
Global Health Technical Assistance Project. Expanding access and demand for DMPA in Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, and Uttarakhand. Washington: Global Health Technical Assistance Project; 2009.
47.
Newbrander W, Ickx P, Feroz F, Stanekzai H. Afghanistan’s basic package of health services: its development and effects on rebuilding the health system. Global Public Health. 2014;9(Suppl 1):6–28.CrossRef
48.
Rana TG, Chataut BD, Shakya G, Nanda G, Pratt A, Sakai S. Strengthening emergency obstetric care in Nepal: the Women’s right to life and health project (WRLHP). Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;98:271–7.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Kumar V, Mohanty S, Kumar A, Misra RP, Santosham M, Awasthi S, Baqui AH, Singh P, Singh V, Ahuja RC, Singh JV, Malik GK, Ahmed S, Black RE, Bhandari M, Darmstadt GL, Saksham Study Group. Effect of community-based behaviour change management on neonatal mortality in Shivgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372:1151–62.CrossRefPubMed
50.
51.
O'Rourke K. The effect of hospital staff training on management of obstetrical patients referred by traditional birth attendants. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1995;48:95–102.CrossRef
52.
Sarker BK, Rahman M, Rahman T, Hossain J, Reichenbach L, Mitra DK. Reasons for preference of home delivery with traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative exploration. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Shah N, Rohra DK. Home deliveries: reasons and adverse outcomes in women presenting to a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60(7):555–8.PubMed
54.
Technical Resource Facility. Health Facility Assessment – Pakistan National Report; 2012.
Metadata
Title
Approaches towards improving the quality of maternal and newborn health services in South Asia: challenges and opportunities for healthcare systems
Authors
Naeem uddin Mian
Muhammad Adeel Alvi
Mariam Zahid Malik
Sarosh Iqbal
Rubeena Zakar
Muhammad Zakria Zakar
Shehzad Hussain Awan
Faryal Shahid
Muhammad Ashraf Chaudhry
Florian Fischer
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0338-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Globalization and Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Commentary

“Cross-border collaboration in onchocerciasis elimination in Uganda: progress, challenges and opportunities from 2008 to 2013”

Research

The bumpy trajectory of performance-based financing for healthcare in Sierra Leone: agency, structure and frames shaping the policy process

Commentary

Stronger together: midwifery twinning between Tanzania and Canada

Commentary

Leveraging the power of partnerships: spreading the vision for a population health care delivery model in western Kenya

Research

Analyzing the impacts of global trade and investment on non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a critical review of methodological approaches used in quantitative analyses

Review

The financial sustainability of the World Health Organization and the political economy of global health governance: a review of funding proposals